public-release-20260715-005
Comparé à public-release-20260714-002.
différentiel Université of Birmingham public-release-20260715-005
Comparaison de public-release-20260714-002 avec public-release-20260715-005.
Journal des modifications
Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Actualité des dossiers publics et état d'examen actuel.
University of Birmingham currently has 15 source-backed claim records and 11 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 19 juil. 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 1 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.
Cette page combine toutes les différences de publication publique pour University of Birmingham. Les instantanés des versions individuelles restent disponibles via leurs URL spécifiques à la version.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Les affirmations récemment extraites sont des ajouts au suivi et ne sont pas nécessairement de nouvelles publications de l'université. Les changements d'instantané source montrent des variations de hachage pour la même URL source et ne constituent pas en eux-mêmes des changements de politique.
Classification sémantique pour cette différence de version.
Diffusion unifiée du suivi générée à partir de toutes les captures instantanées de version publique pour cette université.
Comparaison de public-release-20260714-002 avec public-release-20260715-005.
1 diff de publication publique
Comparé à public-release-20260714-002.
Comparaison de public-release-20260714-002 avec public-release-20260715-005.
15 Affirmation enregistrements
Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Birmingham in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
For assessments and assignments, students should assume generative AI use is not permitted unless the assessment or assignment explicitly states otherwise.
The University states that generative AI detection tools are not currently allowable and that student work should not be uploaded to generative AI detection software.
For AI-supported marking and feedback, the University says all decisions, outcomes, and feedback must be reviewed by academic staff before release to students, and generative AI tools alone cannot allocate marks and student grades.
The research AI guidance says personal, confidential, or sensitive data must not be entered into AI tools without clear justification, data minimisation, and a Data Protection Impact Assessment where applicable.
The student guidance allows use of generative AI tools as study aids for personal learning and research, while distinguishing that from submitting AI-generated output as the student's own assessment work.
The research AI guidance applies to University of Birmingham researchers using, developing, or deploying AI, and places accountability for substantive claims, interpretations, and outputs on human researchers.
University of Birmingham maintains a generative AI framework for teaching, learning, assessment, and support.
Academic staff are expected to state whether and how generative AI tools are permitted in assessments or assignments, including in course outlines, briefs, Canvas pages, and handbooks.
University-wide AI marking principles allow academic staff to use AI systems to support assessment, grading, moderation and feedback after appropriate approval, while academic staff remain responsible for academic judgements and feedback.
For PGT dissertations, students should not submit AI-generated material or content unless the School specifically permits it, and permitted use must follow the University framework and be referenced.
The research AI guidance says researchers should use University-endorsed AI tools for licensing, data protection, and information security compliance, and should justify and record use of unapproved or externally hosted tools.
The researcher tool-selection guidance points researchers to University-approved Enterprise Microsoft Copilot access and tells them to confirm the Enterprise data protection indicator before using it.
The AI tools licensing guidance tells users to review terms and conditions before registering for a new AI tool and to seek advice when data protection, accessibility, indemnity, or copyright concerns arise.
When AI-supported marking and feedback practices are used, student-facing information should explain why and how AI tools are used, human oversight, academic judgement, and privacy concerns about student data or work.
11 source attributions
official_guidance Tracker checked at 13 mai 2026, 05:00
official_guidance Tracker checked at 13 mai 2026, 05:00
official_guidance Tracker checked at 13 mai 2026, 05:00
official_guidance Tracker checked at 13 mai 2026, 05:00
official_guidance Tracker checked at 13 mai 2026, 05:00
official_guidance Tracker checked at 15 juil. 2026, 22:53
official_guidance Tracker checked at 13 mai 2026, 05:00
official_guidance Tracker checked at 13 mai 2026, 05:00
official_guidance Tracker checked at 13 mai 2026, 05:00
official_guidance Tracker checked at 13 mai 2026, 05:00
official_guidance Tracker checked at 13 mai 2026, 05:00