Registro de cambios

University of Birmingham

Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Resumen de cambios

Estado actual de actualización y revisión del registro público.

University of Birmingham currently has 15 source-backed claim records and 11 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 19 jul 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 1 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.

Esta página combina todas las diferencias de versiones públicas para University of Birmingham. Las instantáneas individuales de lanzamiento siguen disponibles desde sus URL específicas del lanzamiento.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Las afirmaciones extraídas recientemente son adiciones al seguimiento y no necesariamente han sido publicadas por la universidad. Los cambios en las instantáneas de origen muestran cambios de hash para la misma URL de origen y no constituyen por sí mismos cambios en la política.

Categorías de diferencias

Clasificación semántica para esta diferencia de versión.

Texto de la política0Extraído recientemente1Evidencia0Instantáneas de origen0Texto de origen0Fuente añadida1Fuente eliminada0

Diferencias de versión combinadas

Diferencia del seguimiento unificado generada a partir de todas las instantáneas de lanzamiento público para esta universidad.

Universidad of Birmingham combined release diferencias

Comparando public-release-20260714-002 con public-release-20260715-005.

+5-0
11 # University of Birmingham AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+ai_tool_treatment: Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Birmingham in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
5+Evidence (en, 1cccf2fb4274): The University of Birmingham says Microsoft Copilot is available free to all University of Birmingham students. Students sign in with their University account or University email and password; the page says queries and chats are not stored or used to train the underlying model.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-15T22:53:43.896Z
47 ## Source attribution added
58 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
9+Source https://intranet.birmingham.ac.uk/student/news/public/2024/oct-dec-2024/microsoft-copilot-genai-now-available-for-students.aspx snapshot 1cccf2fb4274236daaa7465bfdd9e7ccfca1001a484543821a5a71fe856f7106
10+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-15T22:53:43.896Z

Historial de versiones

1 diferencia de lanzamiento público

public-release-20260715-005

Comparado con public-release-20260714-002.

Texto de la política0Extraído recientemente1Instantáneas de origen0Texto de origen0

Universidad of Birmingham public-release-20260715-005 diferencias

Comparando public-release-20260714-002 con public-release-20260715-005.

+5-0
11 # University of Birmingham AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+ai_tool_treatment: Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Birmingham in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
5+Evidence (en, 1cccf2fb4274): The University of Birmingham says Microsoft Copilot is available free to all University of Birmingham students. Students sign in with their University account or University email and password; the page says queries and chats are not stored or used to train the underlying model.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-15T22:53:43.896Z
47 ## Source attribution added
58 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
9+Source https://intranet.birmingham.ac.uk/student/news/public/2024/oct-dec-2024/microsoft-copilot-genai-now-available-for-students.aspx snapshot 1cccf2fb4274236daaa7465bfdd9e7ccfca1001a484543821a5a71fe856f7106
10+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-15T22:53:43.896Z

Cambios en las afirmaciones

15 Afirmación registros

ai_tool_treatment

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Birmingham in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza97%Evidencia1Idiomasen

academic_integrity

For assessments and assignments, students should assume generative AI use is not permitted unless the assessment or assignment explicitly states otherwise.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza96%Evidencia1Idiomasen

security_review

The University states that generative AI detection tools are not currently allowable and that student work should not be uploaded to generative AI detection software.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza96%Evidencia1Idiomasen

academic_integrity

For AI-supported marking and feedback, the University says all decisions, outcomes, and feedback must be reviewed by academic staff before release to students, and generative AI tools alone cannot allocate marks and student grades.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza96%Evidencia1Idiomasen

privacy

The research AI guidance says personal, confidential, or sensitive data must not be entered into AI tools without clear justification, data minimisation, and a Data Protection Impact Assessment where applicable.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza96%Evidencia1Idiomasen

ai_tool_treatment

The student guidance allows use of generative AI tools as study aids for personal learning and research, while distinguishing that from submitting AI-generated output as the student's own assessment work.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza95%Evidencia1Idiomasen

research

The research AI guidance applies to University of Birmingham researchers using, developing, or deploying AI, and places accountability for substantive claims, interpretations, and outputs on human researchers.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza95%Evidencia1Idiomasen

teaching

University of Birmingham maintains a generative AI framework for teaching, learning, assessment, and support.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza94%Evidencia1Idiomasen

teaching

Academic staff are expected to state whether and how generative AI tools are permitted in assessments or assignments, including in course outlines, briefs, Canvas pages, and handbooks.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza94%Evidencia1Idiomasen

teaching

University-wide AI marking principles allow academic staff to use AI systems to support assessment, grading, moderation and feedback after appropriate approval, while academic staff remain responsible for academic judgements and feedback.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza94%Evidencia1Idiomasen

academic_integrity

For PGT dissertations, students should not submit AI-generated material or content unless the School specifically permits it, and permitted use must follow the University framework and be referenced.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza93%Evidencia1Idiomasen

security_review

The research AI guidance says researchers should use University-endorsed AI tools for licensing, data protection, and information security compliance, and should justify and record use of unapproved or externally hosted tools.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza93%Evidencia1Idiomasen

procurement

The researcher tool-selection guidance points researchers to University-approved Enterprise Microsoft Copilot access and tells them to confirm the Enterprise data protection indicator before using it.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza91%Evidencia1Idiomasen

procurement

The AI tools licensing guidance tells users to review terms and conditions before registering for a new AI tool and to seek advice when data protection, accessibility, indemnity, or copyright concerns arise.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza89%Evidencia1Idiomasen

privacy

When AI-supported marking and feedback practices are used, student-facing information should explain why and how AI tools are used, human oversight, academic judgement, and privacy concerns about student data or work.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza88%Evidencia1Idiomasen

Instantáneas de origen

11 source attributions