Log perubahan

University of Birmingham

Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenTerakhir diperiksa19 Jul 2026Terkini diubah19 Jul 2026Tuntutan15Sumber11Keluaran terkinipublic-release-20260715-005Rekod keluaran1

Halaman universiti JSON awam Laporan bulanan Indeks universiti

University of Birmingham currently has 15 source-backed claim records and 11 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 19 Jul 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 1 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.

Halaman ini menggabungkan semua perbezaan pelepasan awam untuk University of Birmingham. Snapshot pelepasan individu kekal boleh diakses dari URL khusus pelepasan mereka.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Tuntutan diekstrak baharu adalah penambahan penjejak dan tidak semestinya diterbitkan baru-baru ini oleh universiti. Perubahan snapshot sumber menunjukkan perubahan hesh untuk URL sumber yang sama dan bukan merupakan perubahan dasar secara langsung.

Teks dasar0Diekstrak baharu1Bukti0Snapshot sumber0Teks sumber0Sumber ditambah1Sumber dialih keluar0

11 # University of Birmingham AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+ai_tool_treatment: Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Birmingham in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
5+Evidence (en, 1cccf2fb4274): The University of Birmingham says Microsoft Copilot is available free to all University of Birmingham students. Students sign in with their University account or University email and password; the page says queries and chats are not stored or used to train the underlying model.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-15T22:53:43.896Z
47 ## Source attribution added
58 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
9+Source https://intranet.birmingham.ac.uk/student/news/public/2024/oct-dec-2024/microsoft-copilot-genai-now-available-for-students.aspx snapshot 1cccf2fb4274236daaa7465bfdd9e7ccfca1001a484543821a5a71fe856f7106
10+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-15T22:53:43.896Z

Sejarah keluaran

1 perbezaan pelepasan awam

public-release-20260715-005

Dibandingkan dengan public-release-20260714-002.

Teks dasar0Diekstrak baharu1Snapshot sumber0Teks sumber0

Perbezaan keluaran Perbezaan JSON

11 # University of Birmingham AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+ai_tool_treatment: Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Birmingham in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
5+Evidence (en, 1cccf2fb4274): The University of Birmingham says Microsoft Copilot is available free to all University of Birmingham students. Students sign in with their University account or University email and password; the page says queries and chats are not stored or used to train the underlying model.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-15T22:53:43.896Z
47 ## Source attribution added
58 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
9+Source https://intranet.birmingham.ac.uk/student/news/public/2024/oct-dec-2024/microsoft-copilot-genai-now-available-for-students.aspx snapshot 1cccf2fb4274236daaa7465bfdd9e7ccfca1001a484543821a5a71fe856f7106
10+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-15T22:53:43.896Z

Perubahan tuntutan

15 rekod Tuntut

ai_tool_treatment

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Birmingham in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan97%Bukti1Bahasaen

academic_integrity

For assessments and assignments, students should assume generative AI use is not permitted unless the assessment or assignment explicitly states otherwise.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan96%Bukti1Bahasaen

security_review

The University states that generative AI detection tools are not currently allowable and that student work should not be uploaded to generative AI detection software.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan96%Bukti1Bahasaen

academic_integrity

For AI-supported marking and feedback, the University says all decisions, outcomes, and feedback must be reviewed by academic staff before release to students, and generative AI tools alone cannot allocate marks and student grades.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan96%Bukti1Bahasaen

privacy

The research AI guidance says personal, confidential, or sensitive data must not be entered into AI tools without clear justification, data minimisation, and a Data Protection Impact Assessment where applicable.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan96%Bukti1Bahasaen

ai_tool_treatment

The student guidance allows use of generative AI tools as study aids for personal learning and research, while distinguishing that from submitting AI-generated output as the student's own assessment work.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan95%Bukti1Bahasaen

research

The research AI guidance applies to University of Birmingham researchers using, developing, or deploying AI, and places accountability for substantive claims, interpretations, and outputs on human researchers.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan95%Bukti1Bahasaen

teaching

University of Birmingham maintains a generative AI framework for teaching, learning, assessment, and support.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan94%Bukti1Bahasaen

teaching

Academic staff are expected to state whether and how generative AI tools are permitted in assessments or assignments, including in course outlines, briefs, Canvas pages, and handbooks.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan94%Bukti1Bahasaen

teaching

University-wide AI marking principles allow academic staff to use AI systems to support assessment, grading, moderation and feedback after appropriate approval, while academic staff remain responsible for academic judgements and feedback.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan94%Bukti1Bahasaen

academic_integrity

For PGT dissertations, students should not submit AI-generated material or content unless the School specifically permits it, and permitted use must follow the University framework and be referenced.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan93%Bukti1Bahasaen

security_review

The research AI guidance says researchers should use University-endorsed AI tools for licensing, data protection, and information security compliance, and should justify and record use of unapproved or externally hosted tools.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan93%Bukti1Bahasaen

procurement

The researcher tool-selection guidance points researchers to University-approved Enterprise Microsoft Copilot access and tells them to confirm the Enterprise data protection indicator before using it.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan91%Bukti1Bahasaen

procurement

The AI tools licensing guidance tells users to review terms and conditions before registering for a new AI tool and to seek advice when data protection, accessibility, indemnity, or copyright concerns arise.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan89%Bukti1Bahasaen

privacy

When AI-supported marking and feedback practices are used, student-facing information should explain why and how AI tools are used, human oversight, academic judgement, and privacy concerns about student data or work.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan88%Bukti1Bahasaen