academic_integrity
Stony Brook's Academic Integrity Policy lists representing work generated by artificial intelligence as one's own work as an example of academic dishonesty.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Stony Brook University, State University of New York
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Stony Brook University, State University of New York currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This page combines all public release diffs for Stony Brook University, State University of New York. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Combined release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
Stony Brook University, State University of New York combined release diff
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+14-0
11 # Stony Brook University, State University of New York AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Stony Brook's Academic Integrity Policy lists representing work generated by artificial intelligence as one's own work as an example of academic dishonesty.
3+Evidence (en, f31702d3b396): The following represents examples of academic dishonesty and does not constitute an exhaustive list: ... Representing work generated by artificial intelligence as one's own work.
4+ai_tool_treatment: Stony Brook guidance says generative AI use in coursework can be prohibited, allowed, or required depending on the course or assignment, and students should consult course policies or instructors when unsure.
5+Evidence (en, 5eaad4a56eaa): Using generative AI in academic work is prohibited in some cases, allowable in others, and required in some instances. Read policies on academic integrity ... consult course policies, and when in doubt ask your instructor.
6+privacy: Stony Brook guidance warns users not to enter sensitive, personal, or proprietary information into generative AI tools without understanding the protections provided by the tool.
7+Evidence (en, 5eaad4a56eaa): You should not enter sensitive, personal, or proprietary information into a generative AI tool without understanding the specific protections provided by that tool.
8+source_status: Stony Brook's central generative AI FAQ states that the University does not currently have an AI policy and is reviewing existing policies for generative AI implications.
9+Evidence (en, 5eaad4a56eaa): Does Stony Brook have an AI policy? No. The University is reviewing existing policies to ensure they appropriately address the power and implications of generative AI.
10+ai_tool_treatment: Stony Brook DoIT maintains an AI Tools directory that identifies available tools such as Copilot, Gemini, NotebookLM, Turnitin, and Zoom AI Companion, while noting that listed tools may not be used with HIPAA data.
11+Evidence (en, d019ff3a7394): A current directory of AI tools offered by DoIT ... HIPPA Data Considerations. The following tools may not be used with HIPAA data. Copilot ... Gemini ... NotebookLM ... Turnitin ... Zoom.
12+teaching: Stony Brook CELT guidance advises instructors to discuss AI usage policies clearly, include AI statements in syllabi, and outline which assignments allow or do not allow AI tools.
13+Evidence (en, 3b987623868a): It is important to discuss your policies on AI usage in a clear and unambiguous manner. Including an AI statement in your course syllabus ... outline which assignments allow for the use of AI tools and which assignments do not permit the usage of AI tools.
14+teaching: Stony Brook CELT guidance says users should review AI-generated content for accuracy because AI tools can produce biased, illogical, false, or nonexistent-source outputs.
15+Evidence (en, 3b987623868a): In many cases, AI tools can develop biased, illogical, or false information and even can generate sources that do not exist. It is important that anyone who makes use of AI tools to generate content reviews its output for accuracy.
Release history
0 public release diffs
Claim changes
7 claim records
ai_tool_treatment
Stony Brook guidance says generative AI use in coursework can be prohibited, allowed, or required depending on the course or assignment, and students should consult course policies or instructors when unsure.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
Stony Brook guidance warns users not to enter sensitive, personal, or proprietary information into generative AI tools without understanding the protections provided by the tool.
Review: Agent reviewed
source_status
Stony Brook's central generative AI FAQ states that the University does not currently have an AI policy and is reviewing existing policies for generative AI implications.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
Stony Brook DoIT maintains an AI Tools directory that identifies available tools such as Copilot, Gemini, NotebookLM, Turnitin, and Zoom AI Companion, while noting that listed tools may not be used with HIPAA data.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
Stony Brook CELT guidance advises instructors to discuss AI usage policies clearly, include AI statements in syllabi, and outline which assignments allow or do not allow AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
Stony Brook CELT guidance says users should review AI-generated content for accuracy because AI tools can produce biased, illogical, false, or nonexistent-source outputs.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
5 source attributions
AI (Artificial Intelligence) | Center for Excellence in Learning and Teaching
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 10:39 PM
AI Tools | Division of Information Technology
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 10:37 PM
Generative Ai | Academic Integrity
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 10:34 PM
Policies and Procedures | Academic Integrity
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 10:36 PM
Resources | Generative AI at Stony Brook
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 10:35 PM