变更日志

Stony Brook University, State University of New York

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

变更摘要

当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。

Stony Brook University, State University of New York currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年5月16日. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 Stony Brook University, State University of New York。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。

目前尚未记录该大学的版本间策略差异行。页面仍会追踪当前基于来源的主张、官方来源归属、审核状态、来源时效性以及用于发现和引用的公开JSON。

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项,不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化,这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。

差异类别

此版本差异的语义分类。

政策文本0新提取的0证据0源快照0源文本0已添加来源0已移除来源0

组合版本差异

由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。

Stony Brook University, State University of New York combined release 差异

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+14-0
11 # Stony Brook University, State University of New York AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Stony Brook's Academic Integrity Policy lists representing work generated by artificial intelligence as one's own work as an example of academic dishonesty.
3+Evidence (en, f31702d3b396): The following represents examples of academic dishonesty and does not constitute an exhaustive list: ... Representing work generated by artificial intelligence as one's own work.
4+ai_tool_treatment: Stony Brook guidance says generative AI use in coursework can be prohibited, allowed, or required depending on the course or assignment, and students should consult course policies or instructors when unsure.
5+Evidence (en, 5eaad4a56eaa): Using generative AI in academic work is prohibited in some cases, allowable in others, and required in some instances. Read policies on academic integrity ... consult course policies, and when in doubt ask your instructor.
6+privacy: Stony Brook guidance warns users not to enter sensitive, personal, or proprietary information into generative AI tools without understanding the protections provided by the tool.
7+Evidence (en, 5eaad4a56eaa): You should not enter sensitive, personal, or proprietary information into a generative AI tool without understanding the specific protections provided by that tool.
8+source_status: Stony Brook's central generative AI FAQ states that the University does not currently have an AI policy and is reviewing existing policies for generative AI implications.
9+Evidence (en, 5eaad4a56eaa): Does Stony Brook have an AI policy? No. The University is reviewing existing policies to ensure they appropriately address the power and implications of generative AI.
10+ai_tool_treatment: Stony Brook DoIT maintains an AI Tools directory that identifies available tools such as Copilot, Gemini, NotebookLM, Turnitin, and Zoom AI Companion, while noting that listed tools may not be used with HIPAA data.
11+Evidence (en, d019ff3a7394): A current directory of AI tools offered by DoIT ... HIPPA Data Considerations. The following tools may not be used with HIPAA data. Copilot ... Gemini ... NotebookLM ... Turnitin ... Zoom.
12+teaching: Stony Brook CELT guidance advises instructors to discuss AI usage policies clearly, include AI statements in syllabi, and outline which assignments allow or do not allow AI tools.
13+Evidence (en, 3b987623868a): It is important to discuss your policies on AI usage in a clear and unambiguous manner. Including an AI statement in your course syllabus ... outline which assignments allow for the use of AI tools and which assignments do not permit the usage of AI tools.
14+teaching: Stony Brook CELT guidance says users should review AI-generated content for accuracy because AI tools can produce biased, illogical, false, or nonexistent-source outputs.
15+Evidence (en, 3b987623868a): In many cases, AI tools can develop biased, illogical, or false information and even can generate sources that do not exist. It is important that anyone who makes use of AI tools to generate content reviews its output for accuracy.

版本历史

0 public release diffs

声明变更

7 声明 条记录

academic_integrity

Stony Brook's Academic Integrity Policy lists representing work generated by artificial intelligence as one's own work as an example of academic dishonesty.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度96%证据1语言en

ai_tool_treatment

Stony Brook guidance says generative AI use in coursework can be prohibited, allowed, or required depending on the course or assignment, and students should consult course policies or instructors when unsure.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%证据1语言en

privacy

Stony Brook guidance warns users not to enter sensitive, personal, or proprietary information into generative AI tools without understanding the protections provided by the tool.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度92%证据1语言en

source_status

Stony Brook's central generative AI FAQ states that the University does not currently have an AI policy and is reviewing existing policies for generative AI implications.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度91%证据1语言en

ai_tool_treatment

Stony Brook DoIT maintains an AI Tools directory that identifies available tools such as Copilot, Gemini, NotebookLM, Turnitin, and Zoom AI Companion, while noting that listed tools may not be used with HIPAA data.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%证据1语言en

teaching

Stony Brook CELT guidance advises instructors to discuss AI usage policies clearly, include AI statements in syllabi, and outline which assignments allow or do not allow AI tools.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度88%证据1语言en

teaching

Stony Brook CELT guidance says users should review AI-generated content for accuracy because AI tools can produce biased, illogical, false, or nonexistent-source outputs.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度86%证据1语言en

源快照

5 source attributions

AI Tools | Division of Information Technology

official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月16日 22:37

快照哈希值
d019ff3a7394581c990eba22085246c7fa1d61411080d4e7bac6fa09ce730681