University AI Policy Tracker

Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.

API docsGitHub repo

Change log

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 11, 2026Last changedMay 11, 2026Claims4Sources3
University pagePublic JSON

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 11, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+8-0
11 # University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: UCLA Academic Senate guidance quotes the Student Conduct Code requirement that submissions must be the student’s own work or clearly acknowledge the source, and says that unless an instructor indicates otherwise, use of ChatGPT or other AI tools for course assignments is akin to receiving assistance from another person.
3+Evidence (en, 168a58d01102): The UCLA Student Conduct Code states, “Unless otherwise specified by the faculty member, all submissions, whether in draft or final form, to meet course requirements (including a paper, project, exam, computer program, oral presentation, or other work) must either be the Student’s own work, or must clearly acknowledge the source.” Unless an instructor indicates otherwise, the use of ChatGPT or other AI tools for course assignments is akin to receiving assistance from another person
4+privacy: UCLA DTS guidance says users may not input FERPA-protected student information, HIPPA/HIPAA-protected health data, employee personnel/performance data, unpublished research/IP/grant proposals, or export-controlled or restricted data into AI tools unless explicitly approved in a secure environment.
5+Evidence (en, c791d23ea915): Users may not input the following into AI tools unless explicitly approved in a secure environment: ( any questions regarding the below, please use grc@ucla.edu as the intake email for your questions) FERPA-protected student information (IDs, grades, coursework, etc) – UCLA Registrar FERPA Policy HIPPA-protected health data – UCLA Health HIPAA Notice Employee personnel/performance data – UC IS-3 Information Security Policy Unpublished research, IP, or grant proposals – UC Copyright & IP Policy Export-controlled or restricted data – UCLA Export Control Guidance
6+ai_tool_treatment: UCLA DTS AI guidance lists a subset of available generative AI tools including Microsoft Copilot and M365 Copilot, Google Gemini, OpenAI ChatGPT Enterprise, Google Notebook LM, AWS Bedrock models, and Zoom AI Companion.
7+Evidence (en, c791d23ea915): Please visit the linked page for most up to date tools, a subset of which is listed below: Microsoft Copilot & M365 Copilot Google Gemini (and Gemini for Workspace) OpenAI ChatGPT Enterprise Google Notebook LM AWS Bedrock models (Amazon Q, PartyRock, Claude, LLaMA, etc.) Zoom AI Companion (Education license)
8+teaching: UCLA Academic Senate guidance encourages instructors to clarify and communicate expectations to students and to consider incorporating academic integrity policies into the syllabus.
9+Evidence (en, 168a58d01102): Instructors are encouraged to clarify and communicate expectations to students • Consider incorporating academic integrity policies into your syllabus

Claim changes

4 claim records

academic_integrity

UCLA Academic Senate guidance quotes the Student Conduct Code requirement that submissions must be the student’s own work or clearly acknowledge the source, and says that unless an instructor indicates otherwise, use of ChatGPT or other AI tools for course assignments is akin to receiving assistance from another person.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

UCLA DTS guidance says users may not input FERPA-protected student information, HIPPA/HIPAA-protected health data, employee personnel/performance data, unpublished research/IP/grant proposals, or export-controlled or restricted data into AI tools unless explicitly approved in a secure environment.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

UCLA DTS AI guidance lists a subset of available generative AI tools including Microsoft Copilot and M365 Copilot, Google Gemini, OpenAI ChatGPT Enterprise, Google Notebook LM, AWS Bedrock models, and Zoom AI Companion.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

UCLA Academic Senate guidance encourages instructors to clarify and communicate expectations to students and to consider incorporating academic integrity policies into the syllabus.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

3 source attributions