建议做

New Delhi, India
本站使用指南
已取得的 2021 年 8 月框架涉及抄袭,未确立学生 AI 专门规则。相似性等级、论文处分、图书馆受众及校方 45 天报告期均保留原范围。
本站解读;官方证据保留原文。
尚无完整的学生政策摘要;可先查看已收录条款及来源。
已取得的 2021 年 8 月框架涉及抄袭,未确立学生 AI 专门规则。相似性等级、论文处分、图书馆受众及校方 45 天报告期均保留原范围。

补充资料采集: 2026-10-09 · 现行适用性未独立确认
本站解读
所取得的 2021 年 8 月政策按所引 UGC 框架涵盖已出版和未出版学术作品中的抄袭;它未确立学生 AI 专门准用规则,也未给出 AI 检测阈值。
适用范围: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
The captured policy dated August 2021 covers plagiarism in published and unpublished academic work under the cited UGC framework. It does not establish an AI-specific student permission rule or an AI-detection threshold.
适用范围: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · university
Plagiarism is the theft of someone’s ideas/language/research output or findings, and is a form
of cheating which is morally and ethically unacceptable. Plagiarism covers all published and
unpublished material, including books, book-chapters, research article, manuscripts,
dissertations and thesis both in printed or electronic form. The Plagiarism policy shall also be
applicable to public writings or website articles, intellectual property like artworks, visual art
works including paintings and images, music, audios, videos, choreography and theatric
performances. The University strongly discourages plagiarism at all levels. In order to prevent
Page 1 of 6
plagiarism in mentioned area and to eliminate the scope of this menace, Jamia Millia Islamia
(Central University) has established a well-articulated policy. It defines the objectives, level of
plagiarism and detection/handling system. The penalties at different levels of plagiarism and
the mechanism of its impplementation has also been developed and presented herein following
UGC gazette notification 2018.查看官方来源 ↗采集日期: 2026-10-09 · 42–55
SHA-256: a40072d2de418eda1d0c140cb3475bd250e6d79e741edcd8e0cd2a2917c73710
本站解读
DAIP/CAIP 遵循自然公正,在收到投诉或启动程序起 45 天内向 UAIP 提交调查报告和处罚建议。这是校方报告期,不是学生申诉期限。
校方 · 采用此程序时须遵守
校方 · 起算:receipt of complaint or initiation of proceedings
Original source unit retained; no calendar calculation.;Only the cited route; no automatic extension or date calculation.
适用范围: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
DAIP/CAIP follows natural justice and sends its investigation report and penalty recommendations to UAIP within 45 days of receipt of complaint or initiation of proceedings. This is an institutional reporting period, not a student appeal deadline.
适用范围: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · university
4.1 Functions and Powers of DAIP/CAIP
(a) The DAIP/CAIP shall follow the principles of natural justice while deciding the
allegation of plagiarism against the student/faculty/researcher/staff.
(b) The DAIP/CAIP shall have the power to assess the level of plagiarism and
recommend penalty(ies) accordingly.
Page 3 of 6
(c) The DAIP/CAIP after investigation shall submit its report with the
recommendation of penalties to be imposed to the UAIP within a period of 45
days from the date of receipt of complaint/initiation of proceedings.查看官方来源 ↗采集日期: 2026-10-09 · 149–160
SHA-256: a40072d2de418eda1d0c140cb3475bd250e6d79e741edcd8e0cd2a2917c73710
本站解读
UAIP 在收到 DAIP/CAIP 建议、投诉或启动程序后 45 天内提交报告和建议,并向被调查者提供副本。政策要求公平答辩且用尽申诉途径后才处罚;此段未给出学生数值申诉期。
校方 · 采用此程序时须遵守
校方 · 起算:receipt of DAIP/CAIP recommendation, complaint or initiation of proceedings
Original source unit retained; no calendar calculation.;Only the cited route; no automatic extension or date calculation.
适用范围: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
UAIP sends its report and recommendations within 45 days after receipt of DAIP/CAIP recommendation, complaint or initiation of proceedings, and provides the person a copy. The policy requires fair defence and exhaustion of appeal avenues before penalty; it does not supply a numerical student appeal period in this passage.
适用范围: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · university
(ii) The UAIP shall also investigate cases of plagiarism as per the provisions
mentioned in these regulations.
(iii) The UAIP shall follow the principles of natural justice while deciding about the
allegation of plagiarism against the student, faculty, researcher and staff of JMI.
(iv) The UAIP shall have the power to review the recommendations of DAIP/CAIP
including penalties with due justification.
(v) The UAIP shall send the report to the competent authority after investigation
and the recommendation on penalties to be imposed by the Vice Chancellor
within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of recommendation of
DAIP/CAIP/ complaint / initiation of the proceedings.
(vi) The UAIP shall provide a copy of the report to the person(s) against whom
inquiry report is submitted.
6. PENALTIES
Penalties in the cases of plagiarism as mentioned in section 1.0 of this policy shall be
imposed among student, faculty, researcher and staff of the JMI only after academic
misconduct on the part of the individual has been established without doubt, when all avenues
of appeal have been exhausted and the individual in question has been provided enough
opportunity to defend himself or herself in a fair and transparent manner.查看官方来源 ↗采集日期: 2026-10-09 · 181–204
SHA-256: a40072d2de418eda1d0c140cb3475bd250e6d79e741edcd8e0cd2a2917c73710
本站解读
图书馆相似性服务面向教师及研究学者,并提供教师用户 ID;它不证明每位本科生都能使用,也不证明抄袭工具具有已验证的 AI 检测能力。
适用范围: Faculty and research scholars; faculty user IDs as described by the library · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
The library similarity service is described for faculty and research scholars, with faculty user IDs for the named similarity services. This does not prove access for every undergraduate or establish that plagiarism tools provide verified AI detection.
适用范围: Faculty and research scholars; faculty user IDs as described by the library · university
Library provides similarity detection services to faculty and
research scholars of the University, using both Original and Turnitin softwares. Individual faculty members have also been provided user ID passwords for similarity detection. Library also organises awareness programmes from time to time for avoiding plagiarism.查看官方来源 ↗采集日期: 2026-10-09 · 384–385
SHA-256: 4e8eb634595f60aedbd7702b93eae79e708feb7095592dfadedd1a0bd5644c3b
本站解读
论文抄袭的第一处罚等级要求在指定且不超过 6 个月的期间内提交修改稿,此段未明确起算;下一等级禁止重交 1 年,最高等级取消注册,并有重复违规及已授学位条款。这些等级是按排除规则处理的抄袭相似性,不是 AI 分数或仅凭疑虑自动处罚。
学生 · 采用此程序时须遵守
学生 · 起算:起算尚未明确
Original source unit retained; no calendar calculation.;Actual stipulated period may be shorter; trigger unspecified; only section 6.1 thesis/dissertation route.
适用范围: Thesis/dissertation submissions under section 6.1 · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
For thesis/dissertation plagiarism, the policy’s first penalty level requires revised work within a stipulated period no longer than six months; the trigger is not specified here. The next level bars resubmission for one year and the highest cancels registration, with repeat-offence and already-awarded-degree provisions. These levels concern plagiarism similarity after the policy’s exclusions, not AI scores or automatic penalties on suspicion.
适用范围: Thesis/dissertation submissions under section 6.1 · university
Repeated offence uses a higher level; already-awarded degree/credit may be put in abeyance on UAIP recommendation and VC approval.
6.1 Penalties in case of Plagiarism in Submission of Thesis and Dissertations
University Academic Integrity Panel (UAIP) shall recommend penalty considering the
severity of the Plagiarism.
(i) Level 0: Similarities upto 10% - Minor Similarities, no penalty.
Page 4 of 6
(ii) Level 1: Similarities above 10% to 40% - Such student shall be asked to
submit a revised script within a stipulated time period not exceeding 6 months.
(iii) Level 2: Similarities above 40% to 60% - Such student shall be debarred
from submitting a revised script for a period of one year.
(iv) Level 3: Similarities above 60% - Registration of such students for that
programme shall be cancelled.
Note 1: Penalty on repeated plagiarism- Such student shall be punished for the
plagiarism of one level higher than the previous level committed by him/her.
In case where plagiarism of highest level is committed then the punishment for
the same shall be operative.
Note 2: Penalty in case where the degree/credit has already been obtained - If
plagiarism is proved on a date later than the date of award of degree or credit,
as the case may be, then his/her degree or credit shall be put in abeyance for a
period recommended by the UAIP and approved by the Vice Chancellor.查看官方来源 ↗采集日期: 2026-10-09 · 206–225
SHA-256: a40072d2de418eda1d0c140cb3475bd250e6d79e741edcd8e0cd2a2917c73710
本站解读
政策要求所列硕士、MPhil、PhD 作品提交原创承诺并经认可的抄袭工具核查。相似性等级对适当引用材料等所列内容有排除规则;这是抄袭相似性规定,不是证明 AI 作者身份的百分比。
适用范围: Specified Master’s, MPhil and PhD submissions · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
The policy requires originality undertakings and approved plagiarism checking for the specified Master’s, MPhil and PhD work. Its similarity levels have exclusions for appropriately attributed material and other listed content; these are plagiarism-similarity rules, not percentages proving AI authorship.
适用范围: Specified Master’s, MPhil and PhD submissions · university
(a) Every student of Masters/M.Phil/PhD while submitting dissertation, thesis, or
any other such documents to the JMI shall submit an undertaking indicating
Page 2 of 6
that the document has been prepared by him or her and that the document is
his/her original work and free of any plagiarism.
(b) The undertaking shall include the fact that the document has been duly checked
through a Plagiarism detection tool approved by the JMI as described in
M.Phil/PhD Ordinance 9 (IX) Para 12 (k) and Annexure XI – A to XI – D.
2.3 Similarity Checks for Exclusion from Plagiarism
The similarity checks for plagiarism shall exclude the following:
(i) All quoted work reproduced with all necessary permission and/or attribution.
(ii) All references, bibliography, table of content, preface and acknowledgements.
(iii) All generic terms, laws, standard symbols and standard equations.
(iv) In case of Dissertation/PhD Thesis, all published papers (articles) drawn from
the Dissertation/Thesis by the scholar
Note: The research work carried out by the student, faculty, researcher and staff shall be
based on original ideas, which shall include abstract, summary, hypothesis,
observations, results, conclusions and recommendations only and shall not have any
similarities. It shall exclude common knowledge or coincidental terms, up to fourteen
(14) consecutive words.
3. LEVELS OF PLAGIARISM
Plagiarism would be quantified into following levels in ascending order of severity for the
purpose of its definition:
(i) Level 0: Similarities upto 10% - Minor similarities, no penalty
(ii) Level 1: Similarities above 10% to 40%
(iii)Level 2: Similarities above 40% to 60%
(iv)Level 3: Similarities above 60%查看官方来源 ↗采集日期: 2026-10-09 · 100–131
SHA-256: a40072d2de418eda1d0c140cb3475bd250e6d79e741edcd8e0cd2a2917c73710
已发布的来源补充。英文摘要与原语言引文和已审核记录分开展示。这里列出可能的程序与结果,不是使用 AI 的自动处罚;现行适用性尚未独立确认,请核对来源的适用范围和版本。
按所存原文核对;不是官方译文
哈希仅用于核对所存内容,不证明现行有效性或不可篡改。这些主题不表示每个学生都会经历的流程。
能获取工具不等于获准在作业中使用。请同时核对任务规则、适用人员和数据限制。
存档工具记录;当前获取方式请核对官方来源。 以下获取说明与证据引用保留原文语言。
Library service describes faculty/research scholars and faculty user IDs. It does not establish universal undergraduate access or verified AI detection.
Faculty user IDs under library service arrangements; no universal student entitlement established.
No individual price established.
补充来源核对日期:
原文引用
Library provides similarity detection services to faculty and
research scholars of the University, using both Original and Turnitin softwares. Individual faculty members have also been provided user ID passwords for similarity detection. Library also organises awareness programmes from time to time for avoiding plagiarism.Reviewed record
2 条已审核条款
Academic Integrity
标准化值: university_plagiarism_policy_with_detection_and_penalty_mechanisms
原始证据
证据 1To create awareness about responsible conduct of research, thesis, dissertation, promotion of academic integrity and prevention of misconduct including plagiarism... To develop systems to detect plagiarism and to set up mechanisms to prevent plagiarism and punish a student, faculty, researcher or staff of JMI committing the act of plagiarism.
本地化显示 only
The policy states that JMI aims to promote academic integrity, detect plagiarism, and establish mechanisms to prevent and punish plagiarism among students, faculty, researchers, and staff.
Academic Integrity
标准化值: library_similarity_detection_original_turnitin_faculty_research_scholars
原始证据
证据 1Library provides similarity detection services to faculty and research scholars of the University, using both Original and Turnitin softwares. Individual faculty members have also been provided user ID passwords for similarity detection. Library also organises awareness programmes from time to time for avoiding plagiarism.
本地化显示 only
The library page says JMI provides similarity detection services with Original and Turnitin for faculty and research scholars, and organizes awareness programmes about avoiding plagiarism.
Source record
2 个来源
jmi.ac.in
jmi.ac.in
Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Jamia Millia Islamia AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/jamia-millia-islamia
Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.
打开变更日志Saved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.