À faire
- Follow originality and attribution requirements.
- Read the applicable thesis procedure and exclusions.
- Check the library service’s actual audience.

New Delhi, India
Student guide · Task scope and procedure
The captured August 2021 framework concerns plagiarism, not an established AI-specific student rule. Similarity levels, thesis sanctions, library audience and institutional 45-day reporting periods retain their original scope.
Le guide ci-dessous est en anglais ; les preuves officielles restent dans leur langue d’origine.
Aucun résumé complet des règles pour les étudiants n’est disponible ; consultez les énoncés et sources recueillis.
The captured August 2021 framework concerns plagiarism, not an established AI-specific student rule. Similarity levels, thesis sanctions, library audience and institutional 45-day reporting periods retain their original scope.



Complément collecté: 2026-10-09 · Applicabilité actuelle non confirmée indépendamment
Résumé disponible actuellement en anglais
Interprétation du site
The captured policy dated August 2021 covers plagiarism in published and unpublished academic work under the cited UGC framework. It does not establish an AI-specific student permission rule or an AI-detection threshold.
Portée: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
Preuves de détection · Soutien et aménagements
Portée: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · university
Plagiarism is the theft of someone’s ideas/language/research output or findings, and is a form
of cheating which is morally and ethically unacceptable. Plagiarism covers all published and
unpublished material, including books, book-chapters, research article, manuscripts,
dissertations and thesis both in printed or electronic form. The Plagiarism policy shall also be
applicable to public writings or website articles, intellectual property like artworks, visual art
works including paintings and images, music, audios, videos, choreography and theatric
performances. The University strongly discourages plagiarism at all levels. In order to prevent
Page 1 of 6
plagiarism in mentioned area and to eliminate the scope of this menace, Jamia Millia Islamia
(Central University) has established a well-articulated policy. It defines the objectives, level of
plagiarism and detection/handling system. The penalties at different levels of plagiarism and
the mechanism of its impplementation has also been developed and presented herein following
UGC gazette notification 2018.Voir la source officielle ↗Collecté: 2026-10-09 · 42–55
SHA-256: a40072d2de418eda1d0c140cb3475bd250e6d79e741edcd8e0cd2a2917c73710
Interprétation du site
DAIP/CAIP follows natural justice and sends its investigation report and penalty recommendations to UAIP within 45 days of receipt of complaint or initiation of proceedings. This is an institutional reporting period, not a student appeal deadline.
Établissement · Obligatoire dans cette procédure
Dans le délai indiqué. Vérifiez le point de départ, la portée et les exceptions dans le résumé et le texte original.
Portée: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
Preuves de détection · Soutien et aménagements
Portée: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · university
4.1 Functions and Powers of DAIP/CAIP
(a) The DAIP/CAIP shall follow the principles of natural justice while deciding the
allegation of plagiarism against the student/faculty/researcher/staff.
(b) The DAIP/CAIP shall have the power to assess the level of plagiarism and
recommend penalty(ies) accordingly.
Page 3 of 6
(c) The DAIP/CAIP after investigation shall submit its report with the
recommendation of penalties to be imposed to the UAIP within a period of 45
days from the date of receipt of complaint/initiation of proceedings.Voir la source officielle ↗Collecté: 2026-10-09 · 149–160
SHA-256: a40072d2de418eda1d0c140cb3475bd250e6d79e741edcd8e0cd2a2917c73710
Interprétation du site
UAIP sends its report and recommendations within 45 days after receipt of DAIP/CAIP recommendation, complaint or initiation of proceedings, and provides the person a copy. The policy requires fair defence and exhaustion of appeal avenues before penalty; it does not supply a numerical student appeal period in this passage.
Établissement · Obligatoire dans cette procédure
Dans le délai indiqué. Vérifiez le point de départ, la portée et les exceptions dans le résumé et le texte original.
Portée: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
Preuves de détection · Soutien et aménagements
Portée: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · university
(ii) The UAIP shall also investigate cases of plagiarism as per the provisions
mentioned in these regulations.
(iii) The UAIP shall follow the principles of natural justice while deciding about the
allegation of plagiarism against the student, faculty, researcher and staff of JMI.
(iv) The UAIP shall have the power to review the recommendations of DAIP/CAIP
including penalties with due justification.
(v) The UAIP shall send the report to the competent authority after investigation
and the recommendation on penalties to be imposed by the Vice Chancellor
within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of recommendation of
DAIP/CAIP/ complaint / initiation of the proceedings.
(vi) The UAIP shall provide a copy of the report to the person(s) against whom
inquiry report is submitted.
6. PENALTIES
Penalties in the cases of plagiarism as mentioned in section 1.0 of this policy shall be
imposed among student, faculty, researcher and staff of the JMI only after academic
misconduct on the part of the individual has been established without doubt, when all avenues
of appeal have been exhausted and the individual in question has been provided enough
opportunity to defend himself or herself in a fair and transparent manner.Voir la source officielle ↗Collecté: 2026-10-09 · 181–204
SHA-256: a40072d2de418eda1d0c140cb3475bd250e6d79e741edcd8e0cd2a2917c73710
Interprétation du site
The library similarity service is described for faculty and research scholars, with faculty user IDs for the named similarity services. This does not prove access for every undergraduate or establish that plagiarism tools provide verified AI detection.
Portée: Faculty and research scholars; faculty user IDs as described by the library · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
Preuves de détection · Soutien et aménagements
Portée: Faculty and research scholars; faculty user IDs as described by the library · university
Library provides similarity detection services to faculty and
research scholars of the University, using both Original and Turnitin softwares. Individual faculty members have also been provided user ID passwords for similarity detection. Library also organises awareness programmes from time to time for avoiding plagiarism.Voir la source officielle ↗Collecté: 2026-10-09 · 384–385
SHA-256: 4e8eb634595f60aedbd7702b93eae79e708feb7095592dfadedd1a0bd5644c3b
Interprétation du site
For thesis/dissertation plagiarism, the policy’s first penalty level requires revised work within a stipulated period no longer than six months; the trigger is not specified here. The next level bars resubmission for one year and the highest cancels registration, with repeat-offence and already-awarded-degree provisions. These levels concern plagiarism similarity after the policy’s exclusions, not AI scores or automatic penalties on suspicion.
Étudiant · Obligatoire dans cette procédure
Dans le délai indiqué · Point de départ non précisé. Vérifiez le point de départ, la portée et les exceptions dans le résumé et le texte original.
Portée: Thesis/dissertation submissions under section 6.1 · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
Portée: Thesis/dissertation submissions under section 6.1 · university
Repeated offence uses a higher level; already-awarded degree/credit may be put in abeyance on UAIP recommendation and VC approval.
6.1 Penalties in case of Plagiarism in Submission of Thesis and Dissertations
University Academic Integrity Panel (UAIP) shall recommend penalty considering the
severity of the Plagiarism.
(i) Level 0: Similarities upto 10% - Minor Similarities, no penalty.
Page 4 of 6
(ii) Level 1: Similarities above 10% to 40% - Such student shall be asked to
submit a revised script within a stipulated time period not exceeding 6 months.
(iii) Level 2: Similarities above 40% to 60% - Such student shall be debarred
from submitting a revised script for a period of one year.
(iv) Level 3: Similarities above 60% - Registration of such students for that
programme shall be cancelled.
Note 1: Penalty on repeated plagiarism- Such student shall be punished for the
plagiarism of one level higher than the previous level committed by him/her.
In case where plagiarism of highest level is committed then the punishment for
the same shall be operative.
Note 2: Penalty in case where the degree/credit has already been obtained - If
plagiarism is proved on a date later than the date of award of degree or credit,
as the case may be, then his/her degree or credit shall be put in abeyance for a
period recommended by the UAIP and approved by the Vice Chancellor.Voir la source officielle ↗Collecté: 2026-10-09 · 206–225
SHA-256: a40072d2de418eda1d0c140cb3475bd250e6d79e741edcd8e0cd2a2917c73710
Interprétation du site
The policy requires originality undertakings and approved plagiarism checking for the specified Master’s, MPhil and PhD work. Its similarity levels have exclusions for appropriately attributed material and other listed content; these are plagiarism-similarity rules, not percentages proving AI authorship.
Portée: Specified Master’s, MPhil and PhD submissions · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
Portée: Specified Master’s, MPhil and PhD submissions · university
(a) Every student of Masters/M.Phil/PhD while submitting dissertation, thesis, or
any other such documents to the JMI shall submit an undertaking indicating
Page 2 of 6
that the document has been prepared by him or her and that the document is
his/her original work and free of any plagiarism.
(b) The undertaking shall include the fact that the document has been duly checked
through a Plagiarism detection tool approved by the JMI as described in
M.Phil/PhD Ordinance 9 (IX) Para 12 (k) and Annexure XI – A to XI – D.
2.3 Similarity Checks for Exclusion from Plagiarism
The similarity checks for plagiarism shall exclude the following:
(i) All quoted work reproduced with all necessary permission and/or attribution.
(ii) All references, bibliography, table of content, preface and acknowledgements.
(iii) All generic terms, laws, standard symbols and standard equations.
(iv) In case of Dissertation/PhD Thesis, all published papers (articles) drawn from
the Dissertation/Thesis by the scholar
Note: The research work carried out by the student, faculty, researcher and staff shall be
based on original ideas, which shall include abstract, summary, hypothesis,
observations, results, conclusions and recommendations only and shall not have any
similarities. It shall exclude common knowledge or coincidental terms, up to fourteen
(14) consecutive words.
3. LEVELS OF PLAGIARISM
Plagiarism would be quantified into following levels in ascending order of severity for the
purpose of its definition:
(i) Level 0: Similarities upto 10% - Minor similarities, no penalty
(ii) Level 1: Similarities above 10% to 40%
(iii)Level 2: Similarities above 40% to 60%
(iv)Level 3: Similarities above 60%Voir la source officielle ↗Collecté: 2026-10-09 · 100–131
SHA-256: a40072d2de418eda1d0c140cb3475bd250e6d79e741edcd8e0cd2a2917c73710
Compléments publiés fondés sur des sources. Les résumés anglais et citations originales sont séparés du dossier vérifié. Les procédures et résultats possibles ne sont pas des sanctions automatiques liées à l’IA. L’applicabilité actuelle n’a pas été confirmée indépendamment ; vérifiez la portée et la version de la source.
Comparaison au texte conservé ; traduction non officielle
Les empreintes permettent de comparer les textes conservés ; elles ne certifient ni leur validité actuelle ni leur immuabilité. Ces thèmes ne sont pas une séquence obligatoire.
L’accès à un outil ne vaut pas autorisation pour une évaluation. Vérifiez les consignes, les personnes éligibles et les restrictions de données.
Enregistrement archivé ; consultez la source officielle pour l’accès actuel. Les informations d’accès et les citations conservent leur langue originale.
Library service describes faculty/research scholars and faculty user IDs. It does not establish universal undergraduate access or verified AI detection.
Faculty user IDs under library service arrangements; no universal student entitlement established.
No individual price established.
Date de vérification du complément:
Citation originale
Library provides similarity detection services to faculty and
research scholars of the University, using both Original and Turnitin softwares. Individual faculty members have also been provided user ID passwords for similarity detection. Library also organises awareness programmes from time to time for avoiding plagiarism.Reviewed record
2 énoncés examinés
Academic Integrity
Valeur normalisée: university_plagiarism_policy_with_detection_and_penalty_mechanisms
Preuve originale
Preuve 1To create awareness about responsible conduct of research, thesis, dissertation, promotion of academic integrity and prevention of misconduct including plagiarism... To develop systems to detect plagiarism and to set up mechanisms to prevent plagiarism and punish a student, faculty, researcher or staff of JMI committing the act of plagiarism.
Affichage localisé only
The policy states that JMI aims to promote academic integrity, detect plagiarism, and establish mechanisms to prevent and punish plagiarism among students, faculty, researchers, and staff.
Academic Integrity
Valeur normalisée: library_similarity_detection_original_turnitin_faculty_research_scholars
Preuve originale
Preuve 1Library provides similarity detection services to faculty and research scholars of the University, using both Original and Turnitin softwares. Individual faculty members have also been provided user ID passwords for similarity detection. Library also organises awareness programmes from time to time for avoiding plagiarism.
Affichage localisé only
The library page says JMI provides similarity detection services with Original and Turnitin for faculty and research scholars, and organizes awareness programmes about avoiding plagiarism.
Source record
2 sources
jmi.ac.in
jmi.ac.in
Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Jamia Millia Islamia AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/jamia-millia-islamia
Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.
Journal des modifications ouvertSaved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.