New Delhi, India

Jamia Millia Islamia

Student guide · Task scope and procedure

Read the plagiarism framework and its limits.

The captured August 2021 framework concerns plagiarism, not an established AI-specific student rule. Similarity levels, thesis sanctions, library audience and institutional 45-day reporting periods retain their original scope.

A complete student policy summary is not available yet; see the collected claims and sources.

Scope and transition details

The captured August 2021 framework concerns plagiarism, not an established AI-specific student rule. Similarity levels, thesis sanctions, library audience and institutional 45-day reporting periods retain their original scope.

Read the plagiarism framework and its limits. hero illustration; exact scope and conditions are in the adjacent source-linked text.
Check the rule for your school and assignment.

What happens if AI use raises a concern?

Supplement collected: 2026-10-09 · Current applicability not independently confirmed

Compare published university record ↗

When a concern arises

Source guidanceFormal procedureModality: Informational

Site interpretation

The captured policy dated August 2021 covers plagiarism in published and unpublished academic work under the cited UGC framework. It does not establish an AI-specific student permission rule or an AI-detection threshold.

Scope: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.

Detection evidence · Support & adjustments

View original text and conditions

Scope: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · university

Plagiarism is the theft of someone’s ideas/language/research output or findings, and is a form of cheating which is morally and ethically unacceptable. Plagiarism covers all published and unpublished material, including books, book-chapters, research article, manuscripts, dissertations and thesis both in printed or electronic form. The Plagiarism policy shall also be applicable to public writings or website articles, intellectual property like artworks, visual art works including paintings and images, music, audios, videos, choreography and theatric performances. The University strongly discourages plagiarism at all levels. In order to prevent Page 1 of 6 plagiarism in mentioned area and to eliminate the scope of this menace, Jamia Millia Islamia (Central University) has established a well-articulated policy. It defines the objectives, level of plagiarism and detection/handling system. The penalties at different levels of plagiarism and the mechanism of its impplementation has also been developed and presented herein following UGC gazette notification 2018.
View official source ↗

Collected: 2026-10-09 · 42–55
SHA-256: a40072d2de418eda1d0c140cb3475bd250e6d79e741edcd8e0cd2a2917c73710

How you can respond

Source guidanceFormal procedureModality: Informational

Site interpretation

DAIP/CAIP follows natural justice and sends its investigation report and penalty recommendations to UAIP within 45 days of receipt of complaint or initiation of proceedings. This is an institutional reporting period, not a student appeal deadline.

DAIP/CAIP report to UAIP · 45 days (type unspecified)

Institution · Required when using this procedure

Within the stated period. Check the source summary and original text for the starting point, scope and exceptions.

Scope: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.

Detection evidence · Support & adjustments

View original text and conditions

Scope: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · university

4.1 Functions and Powers of DAIP/CAIP (a) The DAIP/CAIP shall follow the principles of natural justice while deciding the allegation of plagiarism against the student/faculty/researcher/staff. (b) The DAIP/CAIP shall have the power to assess the level of plagiarism and recommend penalty(ies) accordingly. Page 3 of 6 (c) The DAIP/CAIP after investigation shall submit its report with the recommendation of penalties to be imposed to the UAIP within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of complaint/initiation of proceedings.
View official source ↗

Collected: 2026-10-09 · 149–160
SHA-256: a40072d2de418eda1d0c140cb3475bd250e6d79e741edcd8e0cd2a2917c73710

Source guidanceFormal procedureModality: Informational

Site interpretation

UAIP sends its report and recommendations within 45 days after receipt of DAIP/CAIP recommendation, complaint or initiation of proceedings, and provides the person a copy. The policy requires fair defence and exhaustion of appeal avenues before penalty; it does not supply a numerical student appeal period in this passage.

UAIP report to competent authority · 45 days (type unspecified)

Institution · Required when using this procedure

Within the stated period. Check the source summary and original text for the starting point, scope and exceptions.

Scope: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.

Detection evidence · Support & adjustments

View original text and conditions

Scope: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · university

(ii) The UAIP shall also investigate cases of plagiarism as per the provisions mentioned in these regulations. (iii) The UAIP shall follow the principles of natural justice while deciding about the allegation of plagiarism against the student, faculty, researcher and staff of JMI. (iv) The UAIP shall have the power to review the recommendations of DAIP/CAIP including penalties with due justification. (v) The UAIP shall send the report to the competent authority after investigation and the recommendation on penalties to be imposed by the Vice Chancellor within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of recommendation of DAIP/CAIP/ complaint / initiation of the proceedings. (vi) The UAIP shall provide a copy of the report to the person(s) against whom inquiry report is submitted. 6. PENALTIES Penalties in the cases of plagiarism as mentioned in section 1.0 of this policy shall be imposed among student, faculty, researcher and staff of the JMI only after academic misconduct on the part of the individual has been established without doubt, when all avenues of appeal have been exhausted and the individual in question has been provided enough opportunity to defend himself or herself in a fair and transparent manner.
View official source ↗

Collected: 2026-10-09 · 181–204
SHA-256: a40072d2de418eda1d0c140cb3475bd250e6d79e741edcd8e0cd2a2917c73710

Source guidanceOfficial guidanceModality: Informational

Site interpretation

The library similarity service is described for faculty and research scholars, with faculty user IDs for the named similarity services. This does not prove access for every undergraduate or establish that plagiarism tools provide verified AI detection.

Scope: Faculty and research scholars; faculty user IDs as described by the library · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.

Detection evidence · Support & adjustments

View original text and conditions

Scope: Faculty and research scholars; faculty user IDs as described by the library · university

Library provides similarity detection services to faculty and research scholars of the University, using both Original and Turnitin softwares. Individual faculty members have also been provided user ID passwords for similarity detection. Library also organises awareness programmes from time to time for avoiding plagiarism.
View official source ↗

Collected: 2026-10-09 · 384–385
SHA-256: 4e8eb634595f60aedbd7702b93eae79e708feb7095592dfadedd1a0bd5644c3b

Possible outcomes

Source guidanceFormal procedureModality: Informational

Site interpretation

For thesis/dissertation plagiarism, the policy’s first penalty level requires revised work within a stipulated period no longer than six months; the trigger is not specified here. The next level bars resubmission for one year and the highest cancels registration, with repeat-offence and already-awarded-degree provisions. These levels concern plagiarism similarity after the policy’s exclusions, not AI scores or automatic penalties on suspicion.

maximum stipulated thesis revision period · 6 days

Student · Required when using this procedure

Within the stated period · Starting point not specified. Check the source summary and original text for the starting point, scope and exceptions.

Scope: Thesis/dissertation submissions under section 6.1 · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.

View original text and conditions

Scope: Thesis/dissertation submissions under section 6.1 · university

Conditions & exceptions

Repeated offence uses a higher level; already-awarded degree/credit may be put in abeyance on UAIP recommendation and VC approval.

6.1 Penalties in case of Plagiarism in Submission of Thesis and Dissertations University Academic Integrity Panel (UAIP) shall recommend penalty considering the severity of the Plagiarism. (i) Level 0: Similarities upto 10% - Minor Similarities, no penalty. Page 4 of 6 (ii) Level 1: Similarities above 10% to 40% - Such student shall be asked to submit a revised script within a stipulated time period not exceeding 6 months. (iii) Level 2: Similarities above 40% to 60% - Such student shall be debarred from submitting a revised script for a period of one year. (iv) Level 3: Similarities above 60% - Registration of such students for that programme shall be cancelled. Note 1: Penalty on repeated plagiarism- Such student shall be punished for the plagiarism of one level higher than the previous level committed by him/her. In case where plagiarism of highest level is committed then the punishment for the same shall be operative. Note 2: Penalty in case where the degree/credit has already been obtained - If plagiarism is proved on a date later than the date of award of degree or credit, as the case may be, then his/her degree or credit shall be put in abeyance for a period recommended by the UAIP and approved by the Vice Chancellor.
View official source ↗

Collected: 2026-10-09 · 206–225
SHA-256: a40072d2de418eda1d0c140cb3475bd250e6d79e741edcd8e0cd2a2917c73710

Support & adjustments · Detection evidence

Source guidanceFormal procedureModality: InformationalDetection evidence

Site interpretation

The policy requires originality undertakings and approved plagiarism checking for the specified Master’s, MPhil and PhD work. Its similarity levels have exclusions for appropriately attributed material and other listed content; these are plagiarism-similarity rules, not percentages proving AI authorship.

Scope: Specified Master’s, MPhil and PhD submissions · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.

View original text and conditions

Scope: Specified Master’s, MPhil and PhD submissions · university

(a) Every student of Masters/M.Phil/PhD while submitting dissertation, thesis, or any other such documents to the JMI shall submit an undertaking indicating Page 2 of 6 that the document has been prepared by him or her and that the document is his/her original work and free of any plagiarism. (b) The undertaking shall include the fact that the document has been duly checked through a Plagiarism detection tool approved by the JMI as described in M.Phil/PhD Ordinance 9 (IX) Para 12 (k) and Annexure XI – A to XI – D. 2.3 Similarity Checks for Exclusion from Plagiarism The similarity checks for plagiarism shall exclude the following: (i) All quoted work reproduced with all necessary permission and/or attribution. (ii) All references, bibliography, table of content, preface and acknowledgements. (iii) All generic terms, laws, standard symbols and standard equations. (iv) In case of Dissertation/PhD Thesis, all published papers (articles) drawn from the Dissertation/Thesis by the scholar Note: The research work carried out by the student, faculty, researcher and staff shall be based on original ideas, which shall include abstract, summary, hypothesis, observations, results, conclusions and recommendations only and shall not have any similarities. It shall exclude common knowledge or coincidental terms, up to fourteen (14) consecutive words. 3. LEVELS OF PLAGIARISM Plagiarism would be quantified into following levels in ascending order of severity for the purpose of its definition: (i) Level 0: Similarities upto 10% - Minor similarities, no penalty (ii) Level 1: Similarities above 10% to 40% (iii)Level 2: Similarities above 40% to 60% (iv)Level 3: Similarities above 60%
View official source ↗

Collected: 2026-10-09 · 100–131
SHA-256: a40072d2de418eda1d0c140cb3475bd250e6d79e741edcd8e0cd2a2917c73710

Collection & version notes

Published source-based additions. English summaries and original-language quotations are shown separately from the reviewed record. These are possible processes and outcomes, not automatic penalties for AI use. Present applicability has not been independently confirmed; check the source scope and version.

Source-text comparison; not an official translation

Hashes allow comparison of saved content; they do not certify current validity or immutability. These topics are not a mandatory sequence.

AI tools & access

Tool access is not permission to use AI in an assessment. Check your assignment rules, eligible users and data restrictions.

Archived tool record; consult the official source for current access.

  • Library similarity services (JMI faculty/research scholars)Listed in the institutional services directoryConditions apply
    Access, conditions & official evidence

    Library service describes faculty/research scholars and faculty user IDs. It does not establish universal undergraduate access or verified AI detection.

    Faculty user IDs under library service arrangements; no universal student entitlement established.

    No individual price established.

    Supplement source review date:

    Source 1 ↗

    Original quotation

    Library provides similarity detection services to faculty and research scholars of the University, using both Original and Turnitin softwares. Individual faculty members have also been provided user ID passwords for similarity detection. Library also organises awareness programmes from time to time for avoiding plagiarism.

Reviewed record

Reviewed claims

2 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity2 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

Jamia Millia Islamia's plagiarism policy covers students, faculty, researchers, and staff, and sets objectives to promote academic integrity, detect plagiarism, and punish plagiarism after due process.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: university_plagiarism_policy_with_detection_and_penalty_mechanisms

Original evidence

Evidence 1
To create awareness about responsible conduct of research, thesis, dissertation, promotion of academic integrity and prevention of misconduct including plagiarism... To develop systems to detect plagiarism and to set up mechanisms to prevent plagiarism and punish a student, faculty, researcher or staff of JMI committing the act of plagiarism.

Localized display only

The policy states that JMI aims to promote academic integrity, detect plagiarism, and establish mechanisms to prevent and punish plagiarism among students, faculty, researchers, and staff.

Academic Integrity

Jamia Millia Islamia's Zakir Husain Library provides similarity detection services for faculty and research scholars using Original and Turnitin software, and organizes awareness programmes about avoiding plagiarism.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: library_similarity_detection_original_turnitin_faculty_research_scholars

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Library provides similarity detection services to faculty and research scholars of the University, using both Original and Turnitin softwares. Individual faculty members have also been provided user ID passwords for similarity detection. Library also organises awareness programmes from time to time for avoiding plagiarism.

Localized display only

The library page says JMI provides similarity detection services with Original and Turnitin for faculty and research scholars, and organizes awareness programmes about avoiding plagiarism.

Source record

Official sources

2 sources

Open official source list
Record information, JSON & citation
ReviewAI-assisted reviewConfidence92%Snapshot statusNot publishedJSONPublic JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Jamia Millia Islamia AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/jamia-millia-islamia

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Open change log

Saved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.