public-release-20260715-005
与 public-release-20260714-002 相比。
大学 of Sussex public-release-20260715-005 差异
将 public-release-20260714-002 与 public-release-20260715-005 进行比较。
变更日志
Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。
University of Sussex currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 6 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年7月19日. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 1 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.
此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 University of Sussex。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项,不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化,这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。
此版本差异的语义分类。
由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。
将 public-release-20260714-002 与 public-release-20260715-005 进行比较。
1 公开发布差异
与 public-release-20260714-002 相比。
将 public-release-20260714-002 与 public-release-20260715-005 进行比较。
7 声明 条记录
Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Sussex in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
University of Sussex staff guidance suggests telling students that AI detection tools are fallible and cannot be relied upon.
University of Sussex AI principles say decisions on whether AI use is permitted, not permitted, optional, or required in learning or assessment will be made explicit.
University of Sussex staff guidance says staff and students can access a data-protected Microsoft Copilot with Sussex credentials, and says university data such as learning and teaching content should be used in Copilot rather than less protected AI tools.
University of Sussex student misconduct guidance includes unauthorized or inappropriate use of digital technologies including AI, and gives examples including AI use where prohibited and submitting permitted AI-generated work without required acknowledgement.
University of Sussex staff guidance provides a prohibited-use assessment statement saying generative AI tools must not be used to generate materials or content for that assessment, while allowing other assistive technology for registered reasonable adjustments.
University of Sussex staff guidance says module convenors determine and communicate AI-use permissions via module Canvas sites and choose one of three assessment-level permissions: AI use prohibited, AI in an assistive role, or AI with an integral role.
6 source attributions
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月16日 04:27
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月16日 04:24
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月16日 04:25
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月16日 04:26
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年7月16日 04:01
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月16日 04:28