public-release-20260715-005
Compared with public-release-20260714-002.
University of Sussex public-release-20260715-005 diff
Comparing public-release-20260714-002 to public-release-20260715-005.
Change log
Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Current public record freshness and review state.
University of Sussex currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 6 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: Jul 16, 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 1 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.
This page combines all public release diffs for University of Sussex. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
Comparing public-release-20260714-002 to public-release-20260715-005.
1 public release diff
Compared with public-release-20260714-002.
Comparing public-release-20260714-002 to public-release-20260715-005.
7 claim records
Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Sussex in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
University of Sussex staff guidance suggests telling students that AI detection tools are fallible and cannot be relied upon.
University of Sussex AI principles say decisions on whether AI use is permitted, not permitted, optional, or required in learning or assessment will be made explicit.
University of Sussex staff guidance says staff and students can access a data-protected Microsoft Copilot with Sussex credentials, and says university data such as learning and teaching content should be used in Copilot rather than less protected AI tools.
University of Sussex student misconduct guidance includes unauthorized or inappropriate use of digital technologies including AI, and gives examples including AI use where prohibited and submitting permitted AI-generated work without required acknowledgement.
University of Sussex staff guidance provides a prohibited-use assessment statement saying generative AI tools must not be used to generate materials or content for that assessment, while allowing other assistive technology for registered reasonable adjustments.
University of Sussex staff guidance says module convenors determine and communicate AI-use permissions via module Canvas sites and choose one of three assessment-level permissions: AI use prohibited, AI in an assistive role, or AI with an integral role.
6 source attributions
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 4:27 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 4:24 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 4:25 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 4:26 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at Jul 16, 2026, 4:01 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 4:28 AM