变更日志

Saint Joseph University of Beirut (USJ)

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

变更摘要

当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。

Saint Joseph University of Beirut (USJ) currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年5月17日. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 Saint Joseph University of Beirut (USJ)。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。

目前尚未记录该大学的版本间策略差异行。页面仍会追踪当前基于来源的主张、官方来源归属、审核状态、来源时效性以及用于发现和引用的公开JSON。

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项,不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化,这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。

差异类别

此版本差异的语义分类。

政策文本0新提取的0证据0源快照0源文本0已添加来源0已移除来源0

组合版本差异

由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。

Saint Joseph University of Beirut (USJ) combined release 差异

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+12-0
11 # Saint Joseph University of Beirut (USJ) AI policy record
2+ai_tool_treatment: USJ's AI guiding principles advise users to systematically verify data and information sources provided by generative AI.
3+Evidence (fr, 5c9a77ff9c83): Vérifier systématiquement les données et sources d’information données par l’IA générative.
4+academic_integrity: USJ's ChatGPT-3 guidance says using ChatGPT is not necessarily an academic-integrity violation, but unauthorized use to create content submitted as one's own is considered plagiarism and a violation of academic-integrity policy.
5+Evidence (fr, 89d478951ed6): L'utilisation de ChatGPT n'est pas nécessairement considérée comme une violation de l'intégrité académique, cependant, son utilisation non autorisée pour créer du contenu soumis comme étant le sien propre est considérée comme du plagiat et une violation de la politique d'intégrité académique.
6+teaching: USJ's CINIA page presents guiding principles intended to support effective, responsible, and ethical use of artificial intelligence in higher education teaching and learning, and says the principles were approved and validated by USJ's Committee for Digital and Artificial Intelligence Strategic Orientation.
7+Evidence (fr, 5c9a77ff9c83): Quelques principes directeurs pour un usage efficace, responsable et éthique de l’intelligence artificielle dans l’enseignement et l’apprentissage au supérieur. Note: The Committee for Digital and Artificial Intelligence Strategic Orientation at USJ has approved and validated these guiding principles.
8+academic_integrity: USJ's AI guiding principles frame academic integrity as appropriately incorporating AI-altered or manipulated digital content and citing it accordingly.
9+Evidence (fr, 5c9a77ff9c83): Maintain Academic Integrity: Demonstrate academic integrity by appropriately incorporating AI-altered or manipulated digital content into one's work and citing it accordingly.
10+privacy: USJ's CINIA guidance warns that free AI tools may carry privacy-related risks and should be used with awareness of secure and responsible-use considerations.
11+Evidence (fr, 89d478951ed6): L'utilisation d'outils d'IA gratuits peut comporter certains risques liés à la vie privée. Il est donc crucial d'être conscient de ces outils et des considérations associées pour garantir une utilisation sécurisée et responsable.
12+teaching: USJ's CINIA training catalog includes student training on proper use of AI tools, with ethical questions such as data confidentiality, AI-error responsibility, and possible discrimination from biased training data.
13+Evidence (fr, 6c1054d6df40): Formation aux étudiants au bon usage des outils de l’intelligence artificielle (IA). Soulever les questions reliées aux défis et aux implications éthiques de l’IA telles que la confidentialité des données, la responsabilité en cas d’erreurs de l’IA, et l’éventuelle discrimination liée aux données d’entraînement biaisées.

版本历史

0 public release diffs

声明变更

6 声明 条记录

ai_tool_treatment

USJ's AI guiding principles advise users to systematically verify data and information sources provided by generative AI.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%证据1语言fr

academic_integrity

USJ's ChatGPT-3 guidance says using ChatGPT is not necessarily an academic-integrity violation, but unauthorized use to create content submitted as one's own is considered plagiarism and a violation of academic-integrity policy.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%证据1语言fr

teaching

USJ's CINIA page presents guiding principles intended to support effective, responsible, and ethical use of artificial intelligence in higher education teaching and learning, and says the principles were approved and validated by USJ's Committee for Digital and Artificial Intelligence Strategic Orientation.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度88%证据1语言fr

academic_integrity

USJ's AI guiding principles frame academic integrity as appropriately incorporating AI-altered or manipulated digital content and citing it accordingly.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度88%证据1语言fr

privacy

USJ's CINIA guidance warns that free AI tools may carry privacy-related risks and should be used with awareness of secure and responsible-use considerations.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度86%证据1语言fr

teaching

USJ's CINIA training catalog includes student training on proper use of AI tools, with ethical questions such as data confidentiality, AI-error responsibility, and possible discrimination from biased training data.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度82%证据1语言fr

源快照

4 source attributions

Guiding Principles for Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education Teaching and Learning

official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月17日 13:26

快照哈希值
5c9a77ff9c8395fe4eb02a094b8d65f41155f85a082888fe2c58af2e145d85a8