变更日志

Graz University of Technology

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

变更摘要

当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。

Graz University of Technology currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年5月16日. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 Graz University of Technology。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。

目前尚未记录该大学的版本间策略差异行。页面仍会追踪当前基于来源的主张、官方来源归属、审核状态、来源时效性以及用于发现和引用的公开JSON。

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项,不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化,这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。

差异类别

此版本差异的语义分类。

政策文本0新提取的0证据0源快照0源文本0已添加来源0已移除来源0

组合版本差异

由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。

Graz University of Technology combined release 差异

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+10-0
11 # Graz University of Technology AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: TU Graz treats AI tools in examinations as unauthorized aids unless they are explicitly permitted, and the public teaching page says unpermitted AI use in assessment can make an examination attempt invalid due to cheating.
3+Evidence (en, b947a55eb873): AI tools during an examination are considered unauthorised in accordance with the section of the statutes on scientific and artistic integrity unless they have been explicitly permitted.
4+teaching: TU Graz says teaching staff decide whether and which AI-supported tools may be used in each course or thesis, with only spell-checking, translation, and stylistic-grammatical improvement generally permitted for students absent broader authorization.
5+Evidence (en, b947a55eb873): Students may generally use AI-based tools and Large Language Models (LLMs) such as DeepL, Grammarly and LanguageTool exclusively for spell-checking, translation, and stylistic-grammatical improvement of their own texts.
6+research: TU Graz's researcher guide explicitly encourages researchers to integrate AI into research processes while applying the AI-TU rule: analyse data, interpret results critically, truth-check results, and use results responsibly.
7+Evidence (en, 24e5ba177d7a): TU Graz researchers are explicitly encouraged to integrate AI into their research processes. As the field is changing so rapidly, this guideline is designed as a "living document" and is intended to outline principles for the use of AI applications rather than provide a list of specific tools.
8+privacy: TU Graz guidance requires transparent labelling of AI-supported tool use where applicable and cautions against entering personal, confidential, trade-secret, or NDA-protected data into AI applications.
9+Evidence (en, b947a55eb873): Teachers in the teaching setting and students in examinations and written work ... are subject to the labelling obligation when using AI-supported tools and are responsible for ensuring compliance with the legal regulations.
10+ai_tool_treatment: TU Graz states that Academic AI is available to all TU Graz employees and is intended to provide a secure AI environment respecting data protection and information security.
11+Evidence (en, 49b60c9fea14): The Academic AI is available to all TU Graz employees. The goal of this initiative is to create a secure environment for using AI while respecting data protection and information security.

版本历史

0 public release diffs

声明变更

5 声明 条记录

ai_tool_treatment

TU Graz states that Academic AI is available to all TU Graz employees and is intended to provide a secure AI environment respecting data protection and information security.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%证据2语言en

research

TU Graz's researcher guide explicitly encourages researchers to integrate AI into research processes while applying the AI-TU rule: analyse data, interpret results critically, truth-check results, and use results responsibly.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%证据2语言en

privacy

TU Graz guidance requires transparent labelling of AI-supported tool use where applicable and cautions against entering personal, confidential, trade-secret, or NDA-protected data into AI applications.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%证据3语言en

academic_integrity

TU Graz treats AI tools in examinations as unauthorized aids unless they are explicitly permitted, and the public teaching page says unpermitted AI use in assessment can make an examination attempt invalid due to cheating.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%证据2语言en

teaching

TU Graz says teaching staff decide whether and which AI-supported tools may be used in each course or thesis, with only spell-checking, translation, and stylistic-grammatical improvement generally permitted for students absent broader authorization.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%证据2语言en

源快照

4 source attributions