Change log

Graz University of Technology

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Claims5Sources4

University page Public JSON

Graz University of Technology currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

11 # Graz University of Technology AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: TU Graz treats AI tools in examinations as unauthorized aids unless they are explicitly permitted, and the public teaching page says unpermitted AI use in assessment can make an examination attempt invalid due to cheating.
3+Evidence (en, b947a55eb873): AI tools during an examination are considered unauthorised in accordance with the section of the statutes on scientific and artistic integrity unless they have been explicitly permitted.
4+teaching: TU Graz says teaching staff decide whether and which AI-supported tools may be used in each course or thesis, with only spell-checking, translation, and stylistic-grammatical improvement generally permitted for students absent broader authorization.
5+Evidence (en, b947a55eb873): Students may generally use AI-based tools and Large Language Models (LLMs) such as DeepL, Grammarly and LanguageTool exclusively for spell-checking, translation, and stylistic-grammatical improvement of their own texts.
6+research: TU Graz's researcher guide explicitly encourages researchers to integrate AI into research processes while applying the AI-TU rule: analyse data, interpret results critically, truth-check results, and use results responsibly.
7+Evidence (en, 24e5ba177d7a): TU Graz researchers are explicitly encouraged to integrate AI into their research processes. As the field is changing so rapidly, this guideline is designed as a "living document" and is intended to outline principles for the use of AI applications rather than provide a list of specific tools.
8+privacy: TU Graz guidance requires transparent labelling of AI-supported tool use where applicable and cautions against entering personal, confidential, trade-secret, or NDA-protected data into AI applications.
9+Evidence (en, b947a55eb873): Teachers in the teaching setting and students in examinations and written work ... are subject to the labelling obligation when using AI-supported tools and are responsible for ensuring compliance with the legal regulations.
10+ai_tool_treatment: TU Graz states that Academic AI is available to all TU Graz employees and is intended to provide a secure AI environment respecting data protection and information security.
11+Evidence (en, 49b60c9fea14): The Academic AI is available to all TU Graz employees. The goal of this initiative is to create a secure environment for using AI while respecting data protection and information security.

Claim changes

5 claim records

ai_tool_treatment

TU Graz states that Academic AI is available to all TU Graz employees and is intended to provide a secure AI environment respecting data protection and information security.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence2Languagesen

research

TU Graz's researcher guide explicitly encourages researchers to integrate AI into research processes while applying the AI-TU rule: analyse data, interpret results critically, truth-check results, and use results responsibly.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence2Languagesen

privacy

TU Graz guidance requires transparent labelling of AI-supported tool use where applicable and cautions against entering personal, confidential, trade-secret, or NDA-protected data into AI applications.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence3Languagesen

academic_integrity

TU Graz treats AI tools in examinations as unauthorized aids unless they are explicitly permitted, and the public teaching page says unpermitted AI use in assessment can make an examination attempt invalid due to cheating.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence2Languagesen

teaching

TU Graz says teaching staff decide whether and which AI-supported tools may be used in each course or thesis, with only spell-checking, translation, and stylistic-grammatical improvement generally permitted for students absent broader authorization.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence2Languagesen

Source snapshots

4 source attributions

AI Guide for Researchers at TU Graz

official_pdf checked May 16, 2026

Source URL: https://www.tugraz.at/fileadmin/public/Studierende_und_Bedienstete/Guidelines/AI_Guideline_for_Researchers_at_TU_Graz.pdf
Snapshot hash: 24e5ba177d7aeba73cb4cefbbe89db2c8f5f745937a3879d5cc4b744a9e6729c

Artificial Intelligence (AI) at Graz University of Technology

official_guidance checked May 16, 2026

Source URL: https://www.tugraz.at/en/tu-graz/university/key-objectives-and-focus-areas/digitalisation/ai-at-tu-graz
Snapshot hash: 49b60c9fea141541e4258e1721318893b1f3629efd607144773d1a33e3df9337

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Teaching

official_guidance checked May 16, 2026

Source URL: https://www.tugraz.at/en/studying-and-teaching/teaching-at-tu-graz/strategy-teaching-and-learning/artificial-intelligence-ai-in-teaching
Snapshot hash: 28febe37aa461c78603e693cdf067ae2013ec834cae1207894a9023ad5c24563

Guideline for the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-supported tools in teaching

official_pdf checked May 16, 2026

Source URL: https://www.tugraz.at/fileadmin/public/Studierende_und_Bedienstete/Guidelines/ai_guideline_teaching.pdf
Snapshot hash: b947a55eb8739006bb39eb09f36a0f90d2318bc7fe5baa5053343b9d16ad3e21

Graz University of Technology

Change summary

Claim/evidence diff preview