academic_integrity
ECU's academic-misconduct guidance states that plagiarism includes unacknowledged use of a generative artificial intelligence tool such as ChatGPT.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Edith Cowan University
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Edith Cowan University currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 6 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This page combines all public release diffs for Edith Cowan University. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Combined release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
Edith Cowan University combined release diff
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+10-0
11 # Edith Cowan University AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: ECU's academic-misconduct guidance states that plagiarism includes unacknowledged use of a generative artificial intelligence tool such as ChatGPT.
3+Evidence (en, 7e39b63da458): Plagiarism is defined as presenting, intentionally or unintentionally, the ideas or work of another person as one's own ideas, or work without appropriate referencing or acknowledgement. Plagiarism is the most common and well-known form of academic misconduct. It also includes unacknowledged use of a generative artificial intelligence tool such as ChatGPT
4+academic_integrity: ECU tells students that the same academic-integrity rules that apply to traditional study also apply to generative AI, and that submitting AI-generated work without permission is an academic-integrity breach.
5+Evidence (en, a42467553993): At ECU, the same rules of academic integrity that apply to traditional study also apply to Generative AI. That means honesty, fairness and doing your own work.
6+academic_integrity: ECU Library guidance says students who use generative AI as a study or research tool must acknowledge that use in their assessment, and that not giving credit to GenAI tools counts as plagiarism.
7+Evidence (en, 3b296be2c86b): If you use generative AI like a tool to help your study and research process (as discussed in this guide), you must still acknowledge the use you have put it to even though it has not been used to directly create assessment output.
8+ai_tool_treatment: Edith Cowan University has a public Artificial Intelligence Framework intended to empower staff and students to use AI productively and ethically, with ethical principles and responsible-use guidance rather than a standalone prohibition.
9+Evidence (en, 630078e10e1f): The purpose of this framework is to empower and enable staff and students to productively and ethically use AI, in line with ECU's vision to lead the sector in the educational experience, research with impact, and in positive contributions to industry and communities.
10+teaching: ECU provides student-facing generative-AI learning support that covers responsible use, learning, academic integrity, prompt strategies, attribution, drop-ins, and workshops.
11+Evidence (en, d7b26c57353d): ECU students can access a range of resources on Canvas that offer guidance on using these tools. In alignment with ECU's Ethical Framework, these resources include: advice on how to use gen AI for learning and demonstrating academic integrity; practical prompt strategies for obtaining meaningful feedback; guides for correctly attributing AI-assisted work.
Release history
0 public release diffs
Claim changes
5 claim records
academic_integrity
ECU Library guidance says students who use generative AI as a study or research tool must acknowledge that use in their assessment, and that not giving credit to GenAI tools counts as plagiarism.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
ECU tells students that the same academic-integrity rules that apply to traditional study also apply to generative AI, and that submitting AI-generated work without permission is an academic-integrity breach.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
ECU provides student-facing generative-AI learning support that covers responsible use, learning, academic integrity, prompt strategies, attribution, drop-ins, and workshops.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
Edith Cowan University has a public Artificial Intelligence Framework intended to empower staff and students to use AI productively and ethically, with ethical principles and responsible-use guidance rather than a standalone prohibition.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
6 source attributions
Academic Integrity
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 11:56 AM
AI at uni: how to use it the right way
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 11:47 AM
Artificial Intelligence Framework
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 11:48 AM
Avoiding Academic Misconduct
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 11:57 AM
Generative AI and Copilot: 6. Acknowledgement & Referencing
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 11:51 AM
Generative AI in Learning
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 11:46 AM