Change log

Edinburgh Napier University

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 21, 2026Last changedMay 21, 2026Claims7Sources3Release records0

University page Public JSON Monthly report University index

Edinburgh Napier University currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 21, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for Edinburgh Napier University. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

11 # Edinburgh Napier University AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Edinburgh Napier University's Assessment Policy states that inappropriate use of Generative AI in assessment, including presenting generated content as a student's own work, is cheating and a breach of the Academic Integrity Regulations.
3+Evidence (en, 5753eba27a5b): students' inappropriate use of Generative AI, such as the direct use of generated content presented in an assessment submission as their own work, constitutes a form of cheating and a breach of the Academic Integrity Regulations.
4+academic_integrity: Edinburgh Napier University's generative AI position states that the university does not permit Gen AI detection tools on student assessment submissions, and academic staff are not permitted to use external detection tools on student work.
5+Evidence (en, dccf105794b7): The University Leadership does not permit the use of Gen AI detection tools on student assessment submissions, as current technologies have proven to be unreliable, prone to bias, and we do not have students' informed consent for their use with their work.
6+academic_integrity: Edinburgh Napier University's Assessment Policy says every assessment will use the Assessment Declaration Cover Sheet for students to declare that the submission is their own work and acknowledge other-source contributions, including Generative AI use.
7+Evidence (en, 5753eba27a5b): The Assessment Declaration Cover Sheet will be used in every assessment for students to declare that their submission is their own work and that any contributions from other sources have been acknowledged, including any use of Generative AI.
8+ai_tool_treatment: Edinburgh Napier University's generative AI position says undergraduate and taught postgraduate students who use Gen AI tools in learning or assessments must follow university guidance and acknowledge AI-generated content.
9+Evidence (en, dccf105794b7): If you use Gen AI tools in your learning or assessments, you must follow university guidance and acknowledge AI-generated content.
10+privacy: Edinburgh Napier University's generative AI position says academic staff should never require students to sign up for or use Gen AI tools, citing privacy, ethical, and environmental concerns, and should provide an alternative means of engaging with the task.
11+Evidence (en, dccf105794b7): You should never require students to sign-up for or use Gen AI tools, as they may have privacy, ethical and environmental concerns. Always provide an alternative means for engaging with the task
12+teaching: Edinburgh Napier University's Assessment Policy says programme and module leaders will discuss students' use of generative AI and use the AI Toolkit traffic-light system and assessment briefs to indicate what use is appropriate.
13+Evidence (en, 5753eba27a5b): Programme and module leaders will engage in dialogue with their students on their use of generative AI, using the AI Toolkit and its traffic-light system to indicate what use of generative AI is appropriate in their modules and assessments. Staff will use the assessment brief to indicate what use of Generative AI is appropriate in any given assessment.
14+ai_tool_treatment: My Napier's student guidance tells students to check with their module leader or tutor about what, if any, Gen AI use is allowed in their work and to comply with module-leader guidance.
15+Evidence (en, b67f1708b8e5): You should always first check with your module leader or tutor about what - if any - use of Gen AI is allowed in your work.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

7 claim records

academic_integrity

Edinburgh Napier University's Assessment Policy states that inappropriate use of Generative AI in assessment, including presenting generated content as a student's own work, is cheating and a breach of the Academic Integrity Regulations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Edinburgh Napier University's generative AI position states that the university does not permit Gen AI detection tools on student assessment submissions, and academic staff are not permitted to use external detection tools on student work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Edinburgh Napier University's Assessment Policy says every assessment will use the Assessment Declaration Cover Sheet for students to declare that the submission is their own work and acknowledge other-source contributions, including Generative AI use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

Edinburgh Napier University's generative AI position says undergraduate and taught postgraduate students who use Gen AI tools in learning or assessments must follow university guidance and acknowledge AI-generated content.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

Edinburgh Napier University's generative AI position says academic staff should never require students to sign up for or use Gen AI tools, citing privacy, ethical, and environmental concerns, and should provide an alternative means of engaging with the task.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

Edinburgh Napier University's Assessment Policy says programme and module leaders will discuss students' use of generative AI and use the AI Toolkit traffic-light system and assessment briefs to indicate what use is appropriate.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

My Napier's student guidance tells students to check with their module leader or tutor about what, if any, Gen AI use is allowed in their work and to comply with module-leader guidance.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

3 source attributions