academic_integrity
Birkbeck's student AI guidance states that the AI Declaration must be submitted with all assessments submitted to, or completed on, Moodle, including assessments where the brief permits no AI use.
审核: 智能体已审核
变更日志
Birkbeck, University of London
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
变更摘要
当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。
Birkbeck, University of London currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年5月16日. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 Birkbeck, University of London。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。
目前尚未记录该大学的版本间策略差异行。页面仍会追踪当前基于来源的主张、官方来源归属、审核状态、来源时效性以及用于发现和引用的公开JSON。
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项，不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化，这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。
差异类别
此版本差异的语义分类。
组合版本差异
由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。
Birkbeck, University of London combined release 差异
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+8-0
11 # Birkbeck, University of London AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Birkbeck's student AI guidance states that the AI Declaration must be submitted with all assessments submitted to, or completed on, Moodle, including assessments where the brief permits no AI use.
3+Evidence (en, d6f6bbed3b6f): The AI Declaration must be submitted with all assessments submitted to, or completed on, Moodle, including those where no AI use is permitted by the Assessment Brief.
4+ai_tool_treatment: Birkbeck's student AI guidance says students should use AI tools, including generative AI, only to the extent outlined in the assessment brief, and should not use them where the brief explicitly does not permit them.
5+Evidence (en, d6f6bbed3b6f): You should only use AI tools, including generative AI, to the extent that has been outlined in the assessment brief. Some assessments will permit the use of AI tools for some aspects of your work, while others will not permit any use of AI tools at all.
6+academic_integrity: Birkbeck's student AI guidance says students should retain evidence of their use of AI tools, such as transcripts or screenshots of prompts and outputs, because it may be requested if work is flagged for possible academic misconduct.
7+Evidence (en, d6f6bbed3b6f): You should retain evidence of your use of AI tools including generative AI. This could be in the form of transcripts or screenshots of prompts and outputs.
8+academic_integrity: Birkbeck's Academic Integrity and Misconduct policy includes using generative AI tools such as ChatGPT to create assessment content or argument presented as the student's own intellectual work within its description of contract cheating, unless generative AI use is permitted in the assessment brief with guidance.
9+Evidence (en, 1a7ec093d7a8): This might include using generative artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT to create content and/or argument for your assessment which you then present as your own intellectual work. If you are permitted to use generative AI tools to create content, this will be included in the assessment brief with guidance.
版本历史
0 public release diffs
声明变更
4 声明 条记录
ai_tool_treatment
Birkbeck's student AI guidance says students should use AI tools, including generative AI, only to the extent outlined in the assessment brief, and should not use them where the brief explicitly does not permit them.
审核: 智能体已审核
academic_integrity
Birkbeck's student AI guidance says students should retain evidence of their use of AI tools, such as transcripts or screenshots of prompts and outputs, because it may be requested if work is flagged for possible academic misconduct.
审核: 智能体已审核
academic_integrity
Birkbeck's Academic Integrity and Misconduct policy includes using generative AI tools such as ChatGPT to create assessment content or argument presented as the student's own intellectual work within its description of contract cheating, unless generative AI use is permitted in the assessment brief with guidance.
审核: 智能体已审核
源快照
2 source attributions
Academic Integrity and Misconduct (AIM) Policy and Procedures
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月16日 18:36
AI guidance for students, 2025-26 academic year
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月16日 18:36