academic_integrity
Birkbeck's student AI guidance states that the AI Declaration must be submitted with all assessments submitted to, or completed on, Moodle, including assessments where the brief permits no AI use.
Révision: Révisé par un agent
Journal des modifications
Birkbeck, University of London
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Résumé des modifications
Actualité des dossiers publics et état d'examen actuel.
Birkbeck, University of London currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 16 mai 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
Cette page combine toutes les différences de publication publique pour Birkbeck, University of London. Les instantanés des versions individuelles restent disponibles via leurs URL spécifiques à la version.
Aucune ligne de différence de politique entre les versions n'est encore enregistrée pour cette université. La page suit toujours les affirmations actuelles étayées par des sources, les attributions de sources officielles, l'état d'examen, la fraîcheur des sources et les JSON publics pour la découverte et la citation.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Les affirmations récemment extraites sont des ajouts au suivi et ne sont pas nécessairement de nouvelles publications de l'université. Les changements d'instantané source montrent des variations de hachage pour la même URL source et ne constituent pas en eux-mêmes des changements de politique.
Catégories de différences
Classification sémantique pour cette différence de version.
Différentiel de version combinée
Diffusion unifiée du suivi générée à partir de toutes les captures instantanées de version publique pour cette université.
différentiel Birkbeck, University of London combined release
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+8-0
11 # Birkbeck, University of London AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Birkbeck's student AI guidance states that the AI Declaration must be submitted with all assessments submitted to, or completed on, Moodle, including assessments where the brief permits no AI use.
3+Evidence (en, d6f6bbed3b6f): The AI Declaration must be submitted with all assessments submitted to, or completed on, Moodle, including those where no AI use is permitted by the Assessment Brief.
4+ai_tool_treatment: Birkbeck's student AI guidance says students should use AI tools, including generative AI, only to the extent outlined in the assessment brief, and should not use them where the brief explicitly does not permit them.
5+Evidence (en, d6f6bbed3b6f): You should only use AI tools, including generative AI, to the extent that has been outlined in the assessment brief. Some assessments will permit the use of AI tools for some aspects of your work, while others will not permit any use of AI tools at all.
6+academic_integrity: Birkbeck's student AI guidance says students should retain evidence of their use of AI tools, such as transcripts or screenshots of prompts and outputs, because it may be requested if work is flagged for possible academic misconduct.
7+Evidence (en, d6f6bbed3b6f): You should retain evidence of your use of AI tools including generative AI. This could be in the form of transcripts or screenshots of prompts and outputs.
8+academic_integrity: Birkbeck's Academic Integrity and Misconduct policy includes using generative AI tools such as ChatGPT to create assessment content or argument presented as the student's own intellectual work within its description of contract cheating, unless generative AI use is permitted in the assessment brief with guidance.
9+Evidence (en, 1a7ec093d7a8): This might include using generative artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT to create content and/or argument for your assessment which you then present as your own intellectual work. If you are permitted to use generative AI tools to create content, this will be included in the assessment brief with guidance.
Historique des versions
0 public release diffs
Modifications d'affirmations
4 Affirmation enregistrements
ai_tool_treatment
Birkbeck's student AI guidance says students should use AI tools, including generative AI, only to the extent outlined in the assessment brief, and should not use them where the brief explicitly does not permit them.
Révision: Révisé par un agent
academic_integrity
Birkbeck's student AI guidance says students should retain evidence of their use of AI tools, such as transcripts or screenshots of prompts and outputs, because it may be requested if work is flagged for possible academic misconduct.
Révision: Révisé par un agent
academic_integrity
Birkbeck's Academic Integrity and Misconduct policy includes using generative AI tools such as ChatGPT to create assessment content or argument presented as the student's own intellectual work within its description of contract cheating, unless generative AI use is permitted in the assessment brief with guidance.
Révision: Révisé par un agent
Instantanés source
2 source attributions
Academic Integrity and Misconduct (AIM) Policy and Procedures
official_guidance Tracker checked at 16 mai 2026, 18:36
AI guidance for students, 2025-26 academic year
official_guidance Tracker checked at 16 mai 2026, 18:36