Policy presence
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Brussels, Belgium
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Coursework
No source-backed public claim about coursework AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about coursework, assignments, or syllabus-level AI use.
Exams
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) has 2 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Privacy and data entry
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Academic integrity
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
Named AI services
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Teaching guidance
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Research guidance
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) has 4 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
AI tools
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Research
VUB's research AI guidelines say researchers must provide the greatest possible degree of transparency on AI tool use in scientific activities.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: research_ai_use_transparency_required
Original evidence
Evidence 1Researchers must provide the greatest possible degree of transparency on the use of AI tools in their scientific activities. This means that the way AI tools are used often needs to be described in detail in the Materials & Methods section and/or Supplementary Data, including prompts, output, name and version of the AI tool.
Academic Integrity
VUB's 2025-2026 Education and Examination Regulations classify as an irregularity fraud involving statements or texts produced by generative AI applications without reference to original sources.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: generative_ai_without_original_sources_irregularity
Original evidence
Evidence 1Any form of fraud that constitutes a breach of scientific integrity, including the use of statements or texts produced by generative AI applications without reference to original sources, or the simulation or falsification of research data, is deemed an irregularity as referred to in this article.
Research
VUB's public AI guidelines are scoped to generative AI use in research processes and explicitly state that they do not apply to education.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: research_guidance_scope_not_education
Original evidence
Evidence 1The purpose of these guidelines is to assist researchers in the appropriate use of generative AI in their day-to-day research activities. They are applicable to use of generative AI in research processes. They do not apply to education.
Research
For research processes, VUB says it supports and encourages researchers' use of AI tools while also warning about limitations and risks.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: research_ai_use_supported_with_risk_warnings
Original evidence
Evidence 1The VUB supports and encourages the use of AI tools by researchers. Our university would also like to point out to researchers the limitations and risks that the use of AI tools in research processes can entail.
Privacy
VUB's research AI guidelines say researchers should not enter personal data into AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: research_ai_no_personal_data_input
Original evidence
Evidence 1Researchers serve not to enter the following data in AI tools : o Personal data: data that can (directly or indirectly) lead to the identification of persons
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
3 source attribution
AI Guidelines
vub.be
Education and Examination Regulations 2025-2026
vub.be
Responsible use of artificial intelligence for research purposes
vub.be