Footscray, Australia

Victoria University

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage6 reviewedEvidence-backed claims6Reviewed6Candidate0Official sources5Source languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/victoria-university.json

Policy profile

Coverage score100/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence80%

AI disclosure

Victoria University has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence82%Evidence1Sources1

Teaching guidance

Victoria University has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence1Sources1

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records1

Microsoft Copilot Chat

Victoria University

Tool
Microsoft Copilot Chat
About
Not specified
Access
Not specified
Cost
Not specified
Availability
Unknown
Review
Agent reviewed

Evidence-backed claims

6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Source Status

Victoria University's formal AI Governance and Responsible Use Policy applies to VU staff, students, visitors, contractors, controlled entities, third-party providers, and AI tools used for VU-related purposes.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Normalized value: formal_ai_policy_applies_to_vu_related_ai_use

Original evidence

Evidence 1
This Policy applies to: VU staff, students, visitors, contractors, controlled entities of VU, and third-party providers engaging with AI tools - whether University-provided or publicly available.

Academic Integrity

Victoria University's Academic Integrity Policy lists submitting work derived from a generative AI model without permission or correct acknowledgement as a breach of academic integrity.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Normalized value: unpermitted_or_unacknowledged_genai_work_is_academic_integrity_breach

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Breaches of academic integrity include: ... Submitting (for assessment or review) work derived from a generative artificial intelligence model without permission or correct acknowledgement practices;

Security Review

Victoria University says users who want to use alternative AI tools must assess them using the AI Risk Classification Model, follow AI Steering Committee guidance, and register AI tools in the planned AI Registry.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: alternative_ai_tools_require_risk_assessment_and_registry

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Users who wish to use alternative AI tools (including open-source or publicly available platforms) must assess these tools using the AI Risk Classification Model and follow guidance issued by the AI Steering Committee.

Privacy

Victoria University's AI Governance and Responsible Use Policy restricts access to AI training data or AI outputs involving sensitive or identifiable data to authorised users with a legitimate business purpose.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: sensitive_identifiable_ai_data_access_authorised_users_only

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Only authorised users with a legitimate business purpose may access training data used for AI technologies or AI outputs involving sensitive or identifiable data.

Teaching

Victoria University's Academic Integrity Guidelines say assessment tasks may explicitly allow or disallow text-generating tools, and staff course teams decide and communicate expectations to students.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: assessment_ai_use_depends_on_task_and_course_team_guidance

Original evidence

Evidence 1
some assessment tasks may explicitly ask students to use a tool, while other assessment instructions will explicitly require them not to. As a staff member with VU, your course team will decide the use of these tools for assessment tasks

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

5 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 18, 2026Last changedMay 18, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities