Ulsan, South Korea

University of Ulsan

University of Ulsan has 2 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 2 reviewed claims. Last checked May 21, 2026.

University of Ulsan AI policy short answer

v1 public contract

University of Ulsan has 2 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions, including 2 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 21, 2026. Discovery context: University of Ulsan is listed as QS 2026 rank 801-850.

Citation-ready summary

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of Ulsan as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 21, 2026 and last changed on May 21, 2026. The record contains 2 source-backed claims, including 2 reviewed claims, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-ulsan.json. The entity-level confidence is 84%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim coverage2 reviewedSource languagekoPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-ulsan.json

Policy signals in this record

  • Evidence includes Teaching claims.
  • Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
  • Named AI services detected in public claims: ChatGPT.
  • Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedEvidence-backed claims2Reviewed2Candidate0Official sources2

This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.

This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy profile

Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.

Coverage score70/100Coverage labelmoderate public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence71%

Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.

Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Academic integrity

No source-backed public claim about academic-integrity treatment of AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about AI use under academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.

Evidence-backed claims

2 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Teaching

For the 2026-1 Sports Digital Literacy course, University of Ulsan's Sports Science Division lists the AI-use category as fully permitted and includes generative AI such as ChatGPT among the course's practice-centered elements.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence84%

Normalized value: course_level_ai_fully_permitted

Original evidence

Evidence 1
AI 활용 구분 | 전면 허용(F형). 본 수업은 플립러닝(flipped learning)과 iF-PBL 교수법을 활용하여 운영됩니다. 컴퓨터 기초 및 활용, 생성형 AI(예: ChatGPT), 메타버스, 동영상 제작 등 실습 중심 요소를 포함합니다.

Localized display only

For the Sports Digital Literacy course, the page lists AI use as fully permitted and includes generative AI such as ChatGPT in the practice-centered course elements.

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Ulsan's Sports Science Division describes ChatGPT as a learning support tool for the division and says students remain responsible for final assignment outputs and should follow division and school AI-use guidance.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence82%

Normalized value: department_level_learning_assistant_with_student_responsibility

Original evidence

Evidence 1
스포츠과학부는 생성형 AI 도구인 ChatGPT를 학습 보조 도구로 활용하여, 학생들이 수업 내용을 더 잘 이해하고 스스로 사고할 수 있도록 돕고 있습니다. 안내: ChatGPT는 학습을 돕는 보조 도구이며, 과제 결과물의 최종 책임은 학생 본인에게 있습니다. 수업 및 과제 수행 시 학부와 학교의 AI 활용 지침을 준수해야 합니다.

Localized display only

The Sports Science Division says ChatGPT is used as a learning support tool; students retain final responsibility for assignments and should follow division and school AI-use guidance.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

2 source attribution

디지털전환 - 울산대학교 | 스포츠과학부

sports.ulsan.ac.kr

Snapshot hash
ecda33879231c2c54b178754f1e079a8ece518f99891e9501995eaa5322b5523

스포츠디지털리터러시 - 울산광역시 - 울산대학교 | 스포츠과학부

sports.ulsan.ac.kr

Snapshot hash
b7d6ad3932eef8b0783741f63198ca67f0200c8728137c155c820e107a17aac4

Change log

Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.

View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.

Last checkedMay 21, 2026Last changedMay 21, 2026Open change log

Corrections and missing evidence

Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.

If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.

Back to universities