Tehran, Iran

University of Tehran

University of Tehran is listed as QS 2026 rank 322. University of Tehran has 2 source-backed AI policy claim records from 1 official source attribution. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Short answer

v1 public contract

University of Tehran is listed as QS 2026 rank 322. University of Tehran has 2 source-backed AI policy claim records from 1 official source attribution. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Citation-ready summary

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of Tehran as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 2 source-backed claims, including 2 reviewed claims, from 1 official source attribution. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-tehran.json. The entity-level confidence is 86%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim coverage2 reviewedSource languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-tehran.json

Policy signals in this record

  • Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
  • Evidence includes Privacy claims.
  • No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
  • Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
  • Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedEvidence-backed claims2Reviewed2Candidate0Official sources1

This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.

This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy profile

Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.

Coverage score60/100Coverage labelmoderate public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence73%

Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.

Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.

Policy presence

No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI disclosure

University of Tehran has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.

RequiredMachine candidateConfidence73%Evidence1Sources1

Privacy and data entry

University of Tehran has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence71%Evidence1Sources1

Academic integrity

No source-backed public claim about academic-integrity treatment of AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about AI use under academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Approved tools

University of Tehran has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: required.

RequiredMachine candidateConfidence73%Evidence1Sources1

Teaching guidance

No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.

Evidence-backed claims

2 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Tehran's Journal of Entrepreneurship Development states that AI tools are supportive aids, manuscripts are independently evaluated by expert human reviewers with final decisions made by humans, and AI use in writing or analyzing manuscripts must be disclosed in the article or submission documents.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: journal_ai_supportive_aid_human_review_disclosure

Original evidence

Evidence 1
AI tools are employed solely as supportive aids within ethical frameworks and scientific standards. All manuscripts will be independently evaluated by expert human reviewers, with final decisions made by humans. Any use of AI in writing or analyzing the manuscript must be transparently disclosed within the article or the submission documents.

Privacy

University of Tehran's Journal of Entrepreneurship Development says confidentiality of authors' and reviewers' information is strictly maintained during the use of AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence84%

Normalized value: journal_ai_confidentiality_authors_reviewers

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Confidentiality of authors' and reviewers' information during the use of AI tools is strictly maintained.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

1 source attribution

Change log

Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.

View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.

Last checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Open change log

Corrections and missing evidence

Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.

If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.

Back to universities