Policy presence
University of Tartu has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Tartu, Estonia
University of Tartu
University of Tartu is listed as QS 2026 rank =362. University of Tartu has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
University of Tartu is listed as QS 2026 rank =362. University of Tartu has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of Tartu as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-tartu.json. The entity-level confidence is 96%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: ChatGPT.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
University of Tartu has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coursework
University of Tartu has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
University of Tartu has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
University of Tartu has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
University of Tartu has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
University of Tartu has 3 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
University of Tartu has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
University of Tartu has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
University of Tartu guidance treats submitting work created partly or entirely with AI under one's own name, without mentioning and describing AI use, as inconsistent with academic integrity and as academic misconduct under the Study Regulations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: unacknowledged_ai_work_academic_misconduct
Original evidence
Evidence 1Osaliselt või täielikult TI rakenduse abiga loodud töö esitamine oma nime all ilma TI rakenduse kasutamise mainimise ja kasutusviisi kirjeldamiseta ei ole kooskõlas akadeemilise aususe nõudega ning loetakse õppekorralduse eeskirja kohaselt akadeemiliseks petturluseks.
Localized display only
Submitting work created partly or entirely with AI under one's own name without mentioning and describing AI use is inconsistent with academic integrity and is considered academic misconduct.
Teaching
University of Tartu guidance states that lecturers have the right to decide how artificial intelligence is used in their course and, if necessary, to limit or prohibit its use, with instructions given in the course version information or assignment guidance.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: lecturer_may_set_course_ai_rules
Original evidence
Evidence 1Õppejõul on õigus oma õppeaine raames otsustada, mil viisil tehisintellekti kasutatakse, või vajadusel selle kasutamist piirata või keelata. Sellekohased juhised esitatakse õppeaine versiooni infos või õpiülesande juhises.
Localized display only
The lecturer has the right to decide how AI is used in their course or, if necessary, to limit or prohibit its use; instructions are given in course or assignment information.
Ai Tool Treatment
The University of Tartu guidance encourages the use of artificial intelligence, including text robots, in teaching, and frames that use around purposeful, ethical, critical, and transparent practice.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: encourages_purposeful_ai_use
Original evidence
Evidence 1Tartu Ülikool julgustab kasutama tehisintellekti, sh tekstiroboteid õppetöös. Pigem tuleks mõelda, kuidas õppida neid eesmärgipäraselt, eetiliselt, kriitiliselt ja läbipaistvalt kasutama.
Localized display only
The University of Tartu encourages the use of AI, including text robots, in teaching and says the focus should be on learning to use them purposefully, ethically, critically, and transparently.
Privacy
University of Tartu guidance says that if personal data or other sensitive information needs to be processed with AI applications, users logging in with a UT account should use AI application versions approved by the university IT department and ensure the application is on an authorized computer.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: sensitive_data_requires_approved_ai_versions
Original evidence
Evidence 1Kui osutub vajalikuks isikuandmete või muu tundliku info töötlemine TI rakenduste abil, tuleb TÜ kontoga sisenedes kasutada TÜ infotehnoloogia osakonna poolt heaks kiidetud TI rakenduste versioone ning tagada, et rakendus asuks arvutis, kus on lubatud neid andmeid töödelda.
Localized display only
If personal data or other sensitive information needs to be processed with AI applications, UT account users should use AI application versions approved by UT IT and an authorized computer.
Ai Tool Treatment
The University of Tartu IT wiki states that the university has signed a one-year agreement with OpenAI for ChatGPT Education from 5 December 2025 to 5 December 2026, and that at the current stage licenses are offered primarily to employees.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: chatgpt_education_staff_primary_license
Original evidence
Evidence 1The ChatGPT service is provided by OpenAI, with whom the University of Tartu has signed a one-year agreement (5 December 2025 – 5 December 2026). At the current stage, licenses are offered primarily to employees.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
2 source attribution
ChatGPT Education
wiki.ut.ee
Suunis tehisintellekti kasutamiseks õppetöös
ut.ee
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.