Policy presence
Tallinn University of Technology (TalTech) has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Tallinn, Estonia
Tallinn University of Technology (TalTech)
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
Tallinn University of Technology (TalTech) has 3 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
Tallinn University of Technology (TalTech) has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
Tallinn University of Technology (TalTech) has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
Tallinn University of Technology (TalTech) has 3 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
Tallinn University of Technology (TalTech) has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
Tallinn University of Technology (TalTech) has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
Tallinn University of Technology (TalTech) has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
Tallinn University of Technology (TalTech) has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
Tallinn University of Technology (TalTech) has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
AI tools
Evidence-backed claims
7 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Teaching
TalTech tells lecturers to explain acceptable AI-based software use in assessment, teaching, learning, and homework, and course-level permission or prohibition should be specified in the extended syllabus.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: course_ai_use_disclosure_expected
Original evidence
Evidence 1The lecturers shall explain to students the acceptable use of AI-based software in assessments, teaching, learning and/or homework. Information on this can be found in the extended course description.
Academic Integrity
TalTech permits AI applications as support tools for inspiration, refinement, translation, early-stage learning support, and editing, but says they must not be used for extensive thesis sections, fabricated data, or substantive arguments.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_support_allowed_with_integrity_limits
Original evidence
Evidence 1AI applications can be used as a source of inspiration, a tool for evaluating and refining ideas, for translation, and to support learning during the early stages of the work. AI applications can also be helpful in editing student-generated text during the final stages of work. However, AI applications must not be used for the preparation of extensive sections of a graduation thesis (e.g. an entire chapter), fabricating data for analysis, or generating substantive arguments.
Academic Integrity
TalTech says substantive AI output must be cited or described as a method, and learners remain responsible for accuracy, quality, analysis results, and references.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: substantive_ai_output_citation_and_student_responsibility
Original evidence
Evidence 1If the output from the application is used substantively (such as a section suggested by an AI tool or an image generated by an image creator), the application used must be properly cited as a method. A learner is fully responsible for the accuracy and quality of all information, research material and the results of analysis submitted for assessment, as well as the correctness of all references.
Privacy
TalTech permits AI technologies in teaching and learning only when they comply with personal data processing, data privacy, and cybersecurity regulations and their use does not violate regulations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_use_subject_to_privacy_and_cybersecurity_compliance
Original evidence
Evidence 1The university permits the use of AI technologies in teaching and learning, provided they comply with personal data processing, data privacy, and cybersecurity regulations, and their use by lecturers or students does not violate the regulations.
Ai Tool Treatment
TalTech states that students can use the web version of Microsoft Copilot with a UNI-ID account and says Copilot data entered through that account is protected in a secure isolated environment.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: student_microsoft_copilot_uni_id_available
Original evidence
Evidence 1At the university, students can use the web version of Microsoft Copilot with their UNI-ID account. When using Microsoft Copilot with a UNI-ID account, all entered data is protected and kept in a secure and isolated environment.
Ai Tool Treatment
TalTech's ChatGPT Edu usage rules say users should use ChatGPT primarily for ideas, drafts, and helper text, must not delegate critical decisions to the model, and must not upload sensitive personal, confidential, security-critical, or unauthorized copyrighted content.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: chatgpt_edu_usage_rules_and_prohibited_content
Original evidence
Evidence 1Use ChatGPT primarily for ideas, drafts and helper text, not for making final decisions. Do not delegate critical decision-making to the model – final decisions must always be made by a human. Do not use the tool in a way that could endanger the university’s reputation, security or legal compliance.
Research
TalTech researcher guidance says AI-created texts and analyses should be clearly indicated and documented, and AI must not replace the researcher's critical thinking or act as a hidden author.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: research_ai_transparency_documentation_no_hidden_author
Original evidence
Evidence 1Reproducibility and documentation – texts and analyses created with the help of AI should be clearly indicated and documented. Ethics and reliability – AI must not replace the researcher’s critical thinking or act as a hidden author.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
5 source attribution
AI at TalTech | AI Focus Center
ai.taltech.ee
For lecturers | AI Focus Center
ai.taltech.ee
For researchers | AI Focus Center
ai.taltech.ee
For students | AI Focus Center
ai.taltech.ee
Good practices | Academic information | TalTech
taltech.ee