Pécs, Hungary

University of Pecs

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage4 reviewedEvidence-backed claims4Reviewed4Candidate0Official sources1Source languagehuPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-pecs.json

Policy profile

Coverage score100/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence76%

Policy presence

University of Pecs has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.

UnclearMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

AI disclosure

University of Pecs has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence75%Evidence1Sources1

Academic integrity

University of Pecs has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.

RequiredMachine candidateConfidence75%Evidence1Sources1

Approved tools

University of Pecs has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.

AllowedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Teaching guidance

University of Pecs has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Research guidance

University of Pecs has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Teaching

For student performance assessment, the University of Pecs guideline says the university does not recommend using automated decision-making systems or large language models for substantive qualifying evaluation.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: ai_not_recommended_for_substantive_assessment

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Mindezek alapján az Egyetem nem javasolja sem automatizált döntéshozatali rendszerek, sem nagy nyelvi modellek alkalmazását a hallgatói teljesítmények érdemi, minősítő értékelésére.

Localized display only

For substantive qualifying evaluation of student performance, the university does not recommend automated decision-making systems or large language models.

Ai Tool Treatment

The University of Pecs AI guideline is scoped to educational and research activities needed to meet study requirements and applies to university citizens when they use AI systems in connection with setting, meeting, or evaluating course and training requirements.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: central_ai_guideline_scope

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Jelen irányelv hatálya az adott képzésen a Tanulmányi és Vizsgaszabályzat alapján kiadott tantárgyi követelmények teljesítéséhez szükséges oktatási és kutatási tevékenységekre terjed ki.

Localized display only

The guideline's scope covers educational and research activities needed to meet course requirements issued under the Study and Examination Regulations.

Privacy

The University of Pecs guideline advises students who enter data into AI systems to consider personal-data protection, classified-data protection, cybersecurity rules, and applicable external and university restrictions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: ai_data_entry_privacy_security_guidance

Original evidence

Evidence 1
amennyiben a hallgatók adatokat visznek be az MI-rendszerekbe azok használata során, mindenképpen legyenek figyelemmel a személyes adatok védelmére, a minősített adatok védelmére, a kiberbiztonsági előírások betartására

Localized display only

When students enter data into AI systems, the guideline advises attention to personal data, classified data, and cybersecurity requirements.

Academic Integrity

For student work, the University of Pecs guideline advises students who use AI-generated text to check its content and cite it as AI-produced text according to TVSZ Annex 14 and the citation form recommended in the guideline.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: ai_generated_text_check_and_cite

Original evidence

Evidence 1
ha a fentiek ellenére mégis az MI-rendszerek szövegalkotási produktumát használják fel, ellenőrizzék annak tartalmát, s egyúttal hivatkozzák meg azokat a TVSZ 14. mellékletének 3. §-ával összhangban, mint mesterséges intelligencia által előállított szövegeket

Localized display only

If students use AI-generated text, the guideline says they should check the content and cite it as AI-produced text under TVSZ Annex 14.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

1 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 18, 2026Last changedMay 18, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities