teaching
For student performance assessment, the University of Pecs guideline says the university does not recommend using automated decision-making systems or large language models for substantive qualifying evaluation.
Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.
Change log
Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.
Current public record freshness and review state.
University of Pecs currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 1 official source attribution. Latest tracked changed date: May 18, 2026.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.
Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.
4 claim records
For student performance assessment, the University of Pecs guideline says the university does not recommend using automated decision-making systems or large language models for substantive qualifying evaluation.
The University of Pecs guideline advises students who enter data into AI systems to consider personal-data protection, classified-data protection, cybersecurity rules, and applicable external and university restrictions.
For student work, the University of Pecs guideline advises students who use AI-generated text to check its content and cite it as AI-produced text according to TVSZ Annex 14 and the citation form recommended in the guideline.
The University of Pecs AI guideline is scoped to educational and research activities needed to meet study requirements and applies to university citizens when they use AI systems in connection with setting, meeting, or evaluating course and training requirements.
1 source attribution
official_pdf checked May 18, 2026