Riga, Latvia

University of Latvia

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Reviewed claims

5 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

University of Latvia's 2026 AI regulations require students to clearly indicate AI use in their work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: student_ai_use_disclosure_required

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Studējošajiem būs pienākums skaidri norādīt MI izmantošanas faktu savos darbos, savukārt docētājiem – definēt, kādos gadījumos un kādā apjomā MI izmantošana konkrētajā studiju kursā ir pieļaujama.

Localized display only

Students will have a duty to clearly indicate the fact of AI use in their work, while teaching staff define when and to what extent AI use is permitted in a course.

Privacy

University of Latvia's 2026 AI regulations prohibit students and teaching staff from uploading restricted-access information or study materials to AI tools without a UL-purchased licence or official university implementation.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: restricted_information_upload_prohibited_without_ul_license_or_official_tool

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Studējošajiem un docētājiem būs aizliegts augšupielādēt ierobežotas pieejamības informāciju vai studiju materiālus MI rīkos, kuriem LU nav iegādāta licence vai kas Universitātē nav ieviesti oficiāli.

Localized display only

Students and teaching staff will be prohibited from uploading restricted-access information or study materials to AI tools without a UL-purchased licence or official university implementation.

Academic Integrity

University of Latvia's 2026 AI regulations state that generative-AI content detection tool results cannot be the sole basis for evaluating a student's work or proving an academic-integrity breach.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: ai_detector_not_sole_basis

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Ģeneratīvā MI satura atpazīšanas rīku rezultāti nevarēs tikt izmantoti kā vienīgais pamatojums studējošā darba vērtēšanā vai kā pierādījums akadēmiskā godīguma pārkāpumam.

Localized display only

Generative-AI content detection tool results cannot be used as the sole basis for evaluating student work or as evidence of an academic-integrity violation.

Academic Integrity

University of Latvia treats prohibited or unauthorised AI-tool use in the study process as use of unauthorised aids and a breach of academic integrity.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: unauthorized_ai_academic_integrity_breach

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Prohibited or unauthorised use of AI tools in the study process is considered the use of unauthorised aids which is a breach of academic integrity.

Localized display only

Unauthorised AI-tool use in the study process is treated as unauthorised aids and a breach of academic integrity.

Teaching

University of Latvia teaching staff can permit or prohibit AI-tool use in a study course depending on course goals and intended study results.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: course_level_instructor_permission

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Teaching staff of the UL can permit or prohibit the use of AI tools in their study course. The use of AI tools depends on the intended goals and study results of each study course.

Localized display only

Teaching staff can permit or prohibit AI tools in a course, depending on course goals and study results.

Source record

Official sources

2 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Reviewagent reviewedConfidence94%Snapshot statusNot publishedJSONPublic JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Latvia AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 20, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-latvia

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Open change log