Riga, Latvia

Riga Technical University

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Reviewed claims

4 reviewed claims

Research

The RTU-hosted Scriptus Manet journal policy requires transparent disclosure of AI-tool use in manuscript preparation, prohibits AI tools from generating scholarly content such as ideas, arguments, interpretations, data, or conclusions, and allows auxiliary technical uses such as editing, translation, corpus analysis, and visualization.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence84%

Normalized value: scriptus_manet_journal_ai_disclosure_required_scholarly_generation_prohibited_auxiliary_uses_allowed

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The Journal "Scriptus Manet" mandates the transparent disclosure of any utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in manuscript preparation ... The utilization of AI tools for the generation of scholarly content, encompassing the development of ideas, arguments, interpretations, data, or conclusions, is prohibited.

Academic Integrity

RTU FCSITE graduation-thesis guidelines allow artificial-intelligence-generated thesis content only in limited cases and state that use is not allowed for thesis goals, tasks, conclusions, or original solution content.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence82%

Normalized value: fcsite_thesis_ai_content_limited_and_excluded_from_original_contribution_sections

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Artificial intelligence tools can be used to generate content for the graduation thesis in case: a) it is not related to the skills and knowledge that the student is required to demonstrate ... c) it is authorized or supported by the study program ... The use of such tools is also not allowed for the formulation of the goal, tasks, and conclusions of the thesis.

Research

The RTU-hosted Scriptus Manet journal policy states that authors remain accountable for accuracy, originality, integrity, plagiarism, data validity, and research transparency regardless of AI usage.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence82%

Normalized value: scriptus_manet_authors_accountable_for_integrity_regardless_of_ai_usage

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The author(s) are entirely accountable for the accuracy, originality, and integrity of all content within the submitted manuscript, including sections generated with the aid of AI tools. Authors remain ethically and legally accountable for issues such as plagiarism, data validity, and research transparency, regardless of AI usage.

Academic Integrity

RTU FCSITE graduation-thesis guidelines give a reference-formatting category for generative artificial intelligence tools and say a screenshot of the artificial-intelligence tool response should be included in the thesis appendices.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence78%

Normalized value: fcsite_thesis_guidelines_include_generative_ai_reference_format_and_response_screenshot

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Correct referencing methods regarding the content generated by artificial intelligence tools are given in Appendix 7 of these guidelines. In the appendices to the graduation thesis, the student should include a screenshot of the response provided by the artificial intelligence tool.

Source record

Official sources

3 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Reviewagent reviewedConfidence84%Snapshot statusNot publishedJSONPublic JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Riga Technical University AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 20, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/riga-technical-university

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Open change log