Policy presence
University of Calgary has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Calgary, Canada
University of Calgary
University of Calgary is listed as QS 2026 rank 211. University of Calgary has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
University of Calgary is listed as QS 2026 rank 211. University of Calgary has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of Calgary as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 15, 2026 and last changed on May 15, 2026. The record contains 6 source-backed claims, including 6 reviewed claims, from 4 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-calgary.json. The entity-level confidence is 95%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Security review claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: Microsoft Copilot.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
University of Calgary has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
University of Calgary has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
University of Calgary has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
University of Calgary has 3 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
University of Calgary has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
University of Calgary has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
University of Calgary has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
University of Calgary has 5 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
University of Calgary has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
For graduate studies, the Faculty of Graduate Studies guidelines say students should obtain written, unambiguous authorization before planned GenAI use in graduate work, and students must disclose GenAI use in graduate study work.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: graduate_guidelines_require_authorization_and_disclosure
Original evidence
Evidence 1Students should obtain written, unambiguous authorization (from their supervisor or course instructor if not included in the course outline) prior to the planned use of GenAI tools in graduate work. Students must disclose the use of GenAI tools in their graduate study work.
Security Review
UCalgary IT guidance says a secure version of Microsoft Copilot Chat is available for users with a UCalgary IT account; users must sign in with UCalgary credentials, and personal or Level 3 or 4 business information must not be entered into other large language model tools unless reviewed and approved through the Software Acquisition Process.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: secure_copilot_required_for_sensitive_information_other_llms_need_review
Original evidence
Evidence 1A secure version is available for anyone with a UCalgary IT account. To keep your data protected, you must sign in using your UCalgary credentials. Personal or business information classified as Level 3 or 4 must not be entered into any other large language model unless it has been reviewed and approved through the Software Acquisition Process.
Teaching
University of Calgary teaching-and-learning guidance supports the use of generative AI in teaching and learning, while saying individual educators and instructors should decide if and how it is incorporated and clearly communicate student expectations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: teaching_guidance_supports_instructor_discretion_and_clear_expectations
Original evidence
Evidence 1The University of Calgary supports the use of generative AI in teaching and learning. Individual educators and course instructors should determine if and how generative AI will be incorporated into their course design, activities and assessments.
Academic Integrity
University of Calgary teaching-and-learning guidance says student, faculty, and staff use of generative AI should adhere to existing academic integrity policies, and instructors using generative AI must follow privacy laws for student data.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: genai_use_should_follow_academic_integrity_and_privacy_requirements
Original evidence
Evidence 1The use of generative AI tools by students, faculty, or staff should adhere to our existing academic integrity policies. When using generative AI, instructors must adhere to privacy laws and ensure student data is handled accordingly.
Privacy
For graduate studies, the Faculty of Graduate Studies guidelines say graduate students remain fully accountable for work produced with GenAI and are expected to be aware of privacy, confidentiality, and intellectual-property risks.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: graduate_students_accountable_for_genai_outputs_and_privacy_risks
Original evidence
Evidence 1Graduate students maintain full accountability for all work produced with the aid of GenAI. Graduate students are expected to be aware of how the use of GenAI can lead to potential breaches of privacy, confidentiality and intellectual property rights.
Academic Integrity
For University of Calgary Continuing Education courses, student-facing guidance says GenAI tools should support work rather than replace student thinking and learning; students should check course outlines and instructor policies, and use of prohibited tools may constitute academic misconduct.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: continuing_education_genai_support_not_replacement_check_instructor_policy
Original evidence
Evidence 1In Continuing Education courses, GenAI tools should be used to support your work, and not to replace your own thinking and learning. Please check your course outline and review your instructor's policy on GenAI usage. Using such tools when expressly forbidden may constitute academic misconduct.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
4 source attribution
Generative AI in Teaching and Learning
teaching-learning.ucalgary.ca
Graduate AI Guidelines
grad.ucalgary.ca
Guidelines on Generative Artificial Intelligence Use
conted.ucalgary.ca
Microsoft Copilot Chat
it.ucalgary.ca
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.