Policy presence
University of Aberdeen has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Aberdeen, United Kingdom
University of Aberdeen
University of Aberdeen is listed as QS 2026 rank =262. University of Aberdeen has 7 source-backed AI policy claim records from 6 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
University of Aberdeen is listed as QS 2026 rank =262. University of Aberdeen has 7 source-backed AI policy claim records from 6 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of Aberdeen as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 7 source-backed claims, including 7 reviewed claims, from 6 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-aberdeen.json. The entity-level confidence is 97%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
University of Aberdeen has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
University of Aberdeen has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
University of Aberdeen has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
University of Aberdeen has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
University of Aberdeen has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
University of Aberdeen has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Named AI services
University of Aberdeen has 4 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
University of Aberdeen has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
University of Aberdeen has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
7 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Ai Tool Treatment
Student guidance says students must not use GenAI to do their critical thinking, analysis, evaluation, synthesis, or to generate essays, poems, or creative works.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: students_must_not_outsource_critical_or_creative_assessment_work_to_genai
Original evidence
Evidence 1Important: You must not use GenAI to do your critical thinking, analysis, evaluation, or synthesis. Neither should you use it to generate essays, poems, or any creative works.
Teaching
Course Coordinators must provide students clear guidance on what GenAI tool use is permitted for work submitted for assessment.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: course_coordinators_must_state_genai_assessment_permissions
Original evidence
Evidence 1Course Coordinators must provide clear guidance to students on what is permitted in relation to the use of GenAI tools for the preparation of work that will be submitted for assessment.
Privacy
Student guidance says learning materials and assessment information must not be entered into GenAI tools without explicit permission from the author, and students should never enter personal and sensitive data into GenAI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: students_must_not_enter_learning_assessment_personal_sensitive_data_without_permission
Original evidence
Evidence 1Please note that any learning materials (e.g. lectures) and assessment information (e.g. questions, tasks, activities) must not be entered into these tools without the explicit permission of the author (e.g. Course Coordinator, Lecturer). What you can do: Never enter personal and sensitive data into GenAI tools.
Privacy
Staff guidance says staff should not enter University data, including student work, research data, or lecture materials, into GenAI tools without appropriate permissions.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: staff_should_not_enter_university_data_into_genai_without_permissions
Original evidence
Evidence 1You should not be entering any University data, such as student work, research data, lecture materials, without appropriate permissions.
Academic Integrity
When GenAI use is permitted for assessment, University guidance says students must acknowledge which tools they used, when they used them, and how they used generated content.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: students_must_acknowledge_permitted_genai_use
Original evidence
Evidence 1If you are permitted to use GenAI tools for your assessment, you must ensure you acknowledge which tools you have used, when you used them, and how you used the content that they generated.
Academic Integrity
The University treats unattributed or unedited GenAI tool use in work submitted for assessment as a form of academic integrity concern.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: unattributed_unedited_genai_assessment_use_academic_integrity
Original evidence
Evidence 1Generative Artificial Intelligence Unattributed or unedited use of GenAi tool in work submitted for assessment.
Ai Tool Treatment
The University of Aberdeen states that it is committed to inclusive, ethical and trustworthy use of AI.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: inclusive_ethical_trustworthy_ai_commitment
Original evidence
Evidence 1The University is committed to inclusive, ethical and trustworthy use of AI.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
6 source attribution
Academic Integrity | Students - The University of Aberdeen
abdn.ac.uk
Generative AI and Assessments | StaffNet | The University of Aberdeen
abdn.ac.uk
Generative AI in Education | StaffNet | The University of Aberdeen
abdn.ac.uk
Guidance for Staff on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools in Education
abdn.site
Guidance for Students on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools in Education
abdn.site
Quick Guide to Acknowledging and Citing the Use of GenAI
abdn.site
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.