Duisburg, Germany

Universität Duisburg-Essen

Universität Duisburg-Essen has 6 source-backed AI policy claims from 4 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 6 reviewed claims. Last checked May 21, 2026.

Universität Duisburg-Essen AI policy short answer

v1 public contract

Universität Duisburg-Essen has 6 source-backed AI policy claims from 4 official source attributions, including 6 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 21, 2026. Discovery context: Universität Duisburg-Essen is listed as QS 2026 rank 801-850.

Citation-ready summary

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Universität Duisburg-Essen as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 21, 2026 and last changed on May 21, 2026. The record contains 6 source-backed claims, including 6 reviewed claims, from 4 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/universitat-duisburg-essen.json. The entity-level confidence is 94%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim coverage6 reviewedSource languagedePublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/universitat-duisburg-essen.json

Policy signals in this record

  • Evidence includes Privacy claims.
  • Evidence includes Teaching claims.
  • Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
  • Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
  • Evidence includes Research claims.
  • Named AI services detected in public claims: ChatGPT.
  • Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
  • Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedEvidence-backed claims6Reviewed6Candidate0Official sources4

This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.

This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy profile

Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.

Coverage score85/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence76%

Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.

Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Academic integrity

Universität Duisburg-Essen has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: allowed.

AllowedMachine candidateConfidence75%Evidence1Sources1

Approved tools

Universität Duisburg-Essen has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: blocked.

BlockedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Research guidance

Universität Duisburg-Essen has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence75%Evidence1Sources1

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.

Evidence-backed claims

6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Privacy

UDE tells users of Chat AI that prompts must not contain sensitive or personal data and that uploading copyrighted content is not permitted.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: chat_ai_no_sensitive_personal_data_or_copyrighted_uploads

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Wir weisen darauf hin, dass die Arbeitsanweisungen an das System (so genannte "Prompts") keine sensiblen oder personenbezogenen Daten beinhalten dürfen! Das Hochladen urheberrechtlich geschützter Inhalte ist nicht gestattet.

Localized display only

Prompts must not contain sensitive or personal data; uploading copyrighted content is not permitted.

Teaching

UDE guidance says instructors should clearly state in their courses how they view the use of AI tools and what that means for learning objectives and assessment situations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: instructors_should_state_course_ai_tool_rules

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Lehrende sollten in ihren Veranstaltungen klar benennen, wie sie zum Einsatz von KI-Tools stehen und was dies für das Erreichen der Lernziele und die Prüfungssituation bedeutet.

Localized display only

Instructors should clearly state how they view AI-tool use and what that means for learning objectives and assessments.

Ai Tool Treatment

UDE provides Chat AI with multiple LLMs to its members through GWDG, and says use of Chat AI is voluntary and cannot be ordered for work or study purposes.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: chat_ai_available_to_members_voluntary_use

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Die Universität Duisburg-Essen stellt ihren Mitgliedern über die Gesellschaft für wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung mbH Göttingen (GWDG) das Tool Chat AI mit verschiedenen Large Language Models (LLM) kostenfrei zur Verfügung. Die Nutzung von Chat AI ist freiwillig und kann nicht dienstlich oder für Studienzwecke angeordnet werden.

Localized display only

UDE provides Chat AI with several LLMs to members through GWDG; use is voluntary and cannot be ordered for work or study.

Academic Integrity

UDE guidance states that a breach involving the use or labeling of aids, including AI-related aids in the surrounding guidance, constitutes an attempted deception.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: unpermitted_or_unlabeled_aids_deception_attempt

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Im Falle eines Verstoßes der Nutzung bzw. Kennzeichnung von verwendeten Hilfsmitteln liegt ein Täuschungsversuch vor.

Localized display only

If the use or labeling of aids is violated, the guidance says this is an attempted deception.

Research

UDE Library guidance says AI-based literature search tools do not replace searching scholarly databases and that users should verify AI statements and sources themselves.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: ai_literature_tools_do_not_replace_database_search

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Die Literatursuche mit KI-Tools ersetzt nicht die Recherche in wissenschaftlichen Datenbanken. Verlassen Sie sich nicht ungeprüft auf KI-Aussagen – prüfen Sie Quellen stets selbst.

Localized display only

AI literature search does not replace scholarly database research; AI statements and sources should be checked by users.

Privacy

UDE advises ChatGPT and related integration users to consider that interactions with ChatGPT may be logged and used in the referenced court process; it also notes OpenAI models are available in UDE Chat AI and logs are stored by Microsoft for 30 days.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence82%

Normalized value: openai_interactions_logging_privacy_advisory

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Nutzenden von ChatGPT und Integrationen von ChatGPT, z. B. durch Microsoft, sollten in Zukunft bedenken, dass jegliche Interaktion mit ChatGPT bis auf weiteres protokolliert und im genannten Gerichtsprozess verwendet werden könnte. Auf der Plattform Chat AI, die an der UDE eingesetzt wird, sind ebenfalls Modelle von OpenAI verfügbar. Auch hier werden die Log-Dateien für 30 Tage von Microsoft gespeichert.

Localized display only

Users should consider that ChatGPT interactions may be logged and used in the cited court process; UDE says OpenAI models in Chat AI have Microsoft-stored logs for 30 days.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

4 source attribution

KI-Tools für Literaturrecherche und wissenschaftliches Arbeiten

uni-due.de

Snapshot hash
64f23fafecd34c88e63541208d96ce9a277a39bb165dcfae7c8988182ad7170d

Change log

Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.

View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.

Last checkedMay 21, 2026Last changedMay 21, 2026Open change log

Corrections and missing evidence

Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.

If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.

Back to universities