Policy presence
No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.
Kagurazaka, Japan
Tokyo University of Science
Tokyo University of Science has 3 source-backed AI policy claims from 1 official source attribution. Review state: agent reviewed; 3 reviewed claims. Last checked May 20, 2026.
Tokyo University of Science AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
Tokyo University of Science has 3 source-backed AI policy claims from 1 official source attribution, including 3 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 20, 2026. Discovery context: Tokyo University of Science is listed as QS 2026 rank 801-850.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Tokyo University of Science as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 20, 2026 and last changed on May 20, 2026. The record contains 3 source-backed claims, including 3 reviewed claims, from 1 official source attribution. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/tokyo-university-of-science.json. The entity-level confidence is 92%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Coursework
Tokyo University of Science has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Exams
Tokyo University of Science has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Privacy and data entry
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
Academic integrity
Tokyo University of Science has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Approved tools
Tokyo University of Science has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Named AI services
Tokyo University of Science has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Teaching guidance
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Tokyo University of Science's student message says direct use of generative AI answers in papers or reports should be avoided.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: avoid_direct_use_in_papers_reports
Original evidence
Evidence 1論文、レポートなどの記述に生成系AIの回答をそのまま利用することは避けるべきです。
Localized display only
The message says direct use of generative AI answers in papers, reports, and similar writing should be avoided.
Academic Integrity
Tokyo University of Science's student message warns students to recognize risks including inaccuracy, plagiarism, information leakage, and inhibited learning effects when deciding whether and how to use generative AI.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: caution_plagiarism_information_leakage_learning_risks
Original evidence
Evidence 1しかし、回答がそもそも不正確である可能性が否定できないこと、不用意に利用すると剽窃や情報流出、学習効果の阻害などのリスクがあることを認識し、利用の可否を含めた慎重な判断が必要です。
Localized display only
The message says students need careful judgment, including whether to use generative AI, because answers may be inaccurate and careless use carries risks such as plagiarism, information leakage, and inhibited learning.
Ai Tool Treatment
Tokyo University of Science's April 2023 student message says the university is not currently considering a blanket ban on students using generative AI.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: not_blanket_banned_currently
Original evidence
Evidence 1こうした問題のある一方で、問題解決に当たって参考になる回答が生成されることも少なくないことから、本学においては学生が生成系AIを利用することを全面的に禁止することは現時点では考えていません。
Localized display only
The university states that, while there are issues, it is not currently considering a blanket ban on students using generative AI.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
1 source attribution
科学技術における知的生産活動と生成系AIの利用について
tus.ac.jp
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.