Policy presence
No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.
Kagurazaka, Japan
No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Tokyo University of Science has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Tokyo University of Science has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
Tokyo University of Science has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Tokyo University of Science has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Tokyo University of Science has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: avoid_direct_use_in_papers_reports
Original evidence
Evidence 1論文、レポートなどの記述に生成系AIの回答をそのまま利用することは避けるべきです。
Localized display only
The message says direct use of generative AI answers in papers, reports, and similar writing should be avoided.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: caution_plagiarism_information_leakage_learning_risks
Original evidence
Evidence 1しかし、回答がそもそも不正確である可能性が否定できないこと、不用意に利用すると剽窃や情報流出、学習効果の阻害などのリスクがあることを認識し、利用の可否を含めた慎重な判断が必要です。
Localized display only
The message says students need careful judgment, including whether to use generative AI, because answers may be inaccurate and careless use carries risks such as plagiarism, information leakage, and inhibited learning.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: not_blanket_banned_currently
Original evidence
Evidence 1こうした問題のある一方で、問題解決に当たって参考になる回答が生成されることも少なくないことから、本学においては学生が生成系AIを利用することを全面的に禁止することは現時点では考えていません。
Localized display only
The university states that, while there are issues, it is not currently considering a blanket ban on students using generative AI.
0 machine or needs-review claim
1 source attribution
tus.ac.jp