Freiberg, Germany

Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg

Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg is listed as QS 2026 rank =487. Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Short answer

v1 public contract

Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg is listed as QS 2026 rank =487. Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Citation-ready summary

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 4 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/technische-universitat-bergakademie-freiberg.json. The entity-level confidence is 90%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim coverage5 reviewedSource languagede, enPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/technische-universitat-bergakademie-freiberg.json

Policy signals in this record

  • Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
  • Evidence includes Privacy claims.
  • Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
  • Evidence includes Source status claims.
  • Named AI services detected in public claims: DeepSeek.
  • Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedEvidence-backed claims5Reviewed5Candidate0Official sources4

This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.

This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy profile

Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.

Coverage score90/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence72%

Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.

Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.

AI disclosure

Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.

RequiredMachine candidateConfidence71%Evidence1Sources1

Academic integrity

Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.

RequiredMachine candidateConfidence71%Evidence1Sources1

Teaching guidance

No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.

Evidence-backed claims

5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Ai Tool Treatment

TU Bergakademie Freiberg's URZ states that TU members can use GWDG ChatAI through Academic Cloud/Federated Login with central university credentials.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: TU members can access GWDG ChatAI via federated login.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Since 22 February 2024, the GWDG has been offering its own Chatbot (ChatAI), which TU members can also use. It is a free alternative to ChatGPT & Co.

Original evidence

Evidence 2
This is a service of the Academic Cloud. Every member of the participating institutions can use the Academic Cloud services. Web-based access to ChatAI is via the "Federated Login". To do this, please select "TU Bergakademie Freiberg" and log in with your central user data.

Privacy

The URZ ChatAI page states that, compared with commercial providers, no data is stored at GWDG or elsewhere or used for training, and open-source models are hosted directly by GWDG.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: ChatAI is described as avoiding data storage/training use by GWDG or elsewhere.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
A major advantage of ChatAI compared to commercial providers is that no data is stored at the GWDG or elsewhere or used for training purposes, for example. All open source models are hosted directly by the GWDG.

Ai Tool Treatment

A TU Freiberg news item says DeepSeek R1 is available to university members through a GWDG agreement for privacy-compliant testing via AcademicCloud services.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: DeepSeek R1 available to TU members via GWDG/AcademicCloud for testing.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Ab sofort steht den Angehörigen der TU Bergakademie Freiberg das vielgelobte KI-Modell DeepSeek R1 über eine Vereinbarung mit der GWDG (Gesellschaft für wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung) datenschutzkonform zur Erprobung zur Verfügung.

Localized display only

DeepSeek R1 is available to members of TU Bergakademie Freiberg through a GWDG agreement for privacy-compliant testing.

Academic Integrity

A TU Freiberg PDF guide for the Professur für Rohstoffabbau und Spezialverfahren unter Tage states that AI-tool use in student and scientific documents must be clearly identified; unmarked AI use is evaluated as attempted fraud.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence84%

Normalized value: Professorship-specific AI disclosure and citation guidance for academic work.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Dieser Leitfaden definiert die Maßstäbe und Kriterien zur Bewertung aller Prüfungsleistungen an der Professur für Rohstoffabbau und Spezialverfahren unter Tage.

Localized display only

The guide defines assessment criteria for all examination work at the Professur für Rohstoffabbau und Spezialverfahren unter Tage.

Original evidence

Evidence 2
In studentischen Arbeiten (Bachelor-, Master-, Studien-, und Diplomarbeiten) und anderen wissenschaftlichen Dokumenten (z. B. Praktikums- und Exkursionsberichten) müssen beim Einsatz von KI-gestützten Tools transparente Quellenangaben aufgeführt werden.

Localized display only

For student work and other scientific documents, the guide says transparent source information must be listed when AI-supported tools are used.

Source Status

Official-source discovery found AI-related university materials, but this crawl did not verify a central university-wide binding academic AI policy; the strongest academic-use guidance found is explicitly scoped to one professorship.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence74%

Normalized value: No verified central university-wide binding academic AI policy found in this crawl.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Leitfaden zur Verwendung von KI-Tools an der Professur für Rohstoffabbau und Spezialverfahren unter Tage, Institut für Bergbau und Spezialtiefbau, TU Bergakademie Freiberg.

Localized display only

The official AI-tool guide found in this crawl is scoped to a specific professorship and institute at TU Bergakademie Freiberg.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

4 source attribution

Leistungsfähige KI DeepSeek R1 verfügbar

tu-freiberg.de

Snapshot hash
92c80ba981caa5207d7947fefcc722487a3a571bd73d429f7ef6f5bc88e16efd

Change log

Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.

View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.

Last checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Open change log

Corrections and missing evidence

Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.

If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.

Back to universities