Policy presence
Technical University of Darmstadt has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Darmstadt, Germany
Technical University of Darmstadt
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
Technical University of Darmstadt has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
No source-backed public claim about coursework AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about coursework, assignments, or syllabus-level AI use.
Exams
Technical University of Darmstadt has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Privacy and data entry
Technical University of Darmstadt has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
Technical University of Darmstadt has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Approved tools
No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
Named AI services
Technical University of Darmstadt has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Teaching guidance
Technical University of Darmstadt has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
AI tools
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
Evidence-backed claims
4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Teaching
TU Darmstadt provides a generative AI handreichung as orientation for students and lecturers, covering reflected, transparent use, good scientific practice, and context-specific rules for examinations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: generative-ai-orientation-for-study-and-teaching
Original evidence
Evidence 1Die TU Darmstadt stellt mit der Handreichung zu generativer KI eine Orientierungshilfe für Studierende und Lehrende bereit. Sie unterstützt dabei, KI-Hilfsmittel reflektiert, transparent und im Sinne guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis einzusetzen.
Localized display only
TU Darmstadt says its generative AI handreichung is an orientation aid for students and lecturers and supports reflected, transparent use aligned with good scientific practice.
Academic Integrity
TU Darmstadt's HDA guidance says students remain responsible for submitted work, while lecturers decide whether and how AI may be used in an examination task.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: student-responsibility-and-lecturer-determined-exam-ai-use
Original evidence
Evidence 1Wichtig ist: Die Verantwortung für eingereichte Arbeiten bleibt immer bei den Studierenden. Ob und wie KI in einer Prüfungsleistung genutzt werden darf, legen die jeweiligen Lehrenden fest.
Localized display only
Students remain responsible for submitted work; lecturers determine whether and how AI may be used in an examination task.
Privacy
TU Darmstadt's data protection page says personal data may be used in AI-related teaching only under data protection rules and identifies prompt submitters as responsible for AI-generated data protection violations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai-teaching-personal-data-under-data-protection-rules
Original evidence
Evidence 1Personenbezogene Daten dürfen nur mach den Regeln des Datenschutzes eingesetzt werden. Daten sind dann personenbezogen, wenn sie die Identifikation einer Person ermöglichen, Art. 4 Nr. 1 DSGVO. Verantwortlich für Datenschutzverletzungen in der Hochschullehre sind diejenigen, die durch Eingabe von Prompts das Erzeugen der KI-Ergebnisse anstoßen und formen.
Localized display only
Personal data may only be used under data protection rules, and the page says those who enter prompts and shape AI results are responsible for data protection violations in university teaching.
Academic Integrity
TU Darmstadt's Computer Science department treats AI tools as examination aids under APB section 22(7), says they must be listed in written work when used, and warns that undisclosed or prohibited use can trigger suspected deception under APB section 38.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: computer-science-ai-tools-as-exam-aids-disclosure
Original evidence
Evidence 1KI-Hilfsmittel sind im Sinne des §22 (7) APB als Hilfsmittel zu verstehen und müssen deshalb immer als solche in den Quellenangaben einer schriftlichen Arbeit angegeben werden. Sollten KI-Hilfsmittel trotz Verwendung nicht als Hilfsmittel angegeben oder trotz Untersagung als Hilfsmittel eingesetzt worden sein, droht die Feststellung eines Täuschungsversuchs nach §38 APB.
Localized display only
The Computer Science page says AI tools are aids under APB section 22(7), must be disclosed in written work, and undisclosed or prohibited use may trigger suspected deception under APB section 38.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
3 source attribution
Datenschutzbeauftragter
tu-darmstadt.de
Handreichung generative KI
hda.tu-darmstadt.de
KI-Hilfsmittel in Pruefungen
informatik.tu-darmstadt.de