Policy presence
Technical University of Darmstadt has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Darmstadt, Germany
Technical University of Darmstadt
Technical University of Darmstadt is listed as QS 2026 rank =253. Technical University of Darmstadt has 4 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
Technical University of Darmstadt is listed as QS 2026 rank =253. Technical University of Darmstadt has 4 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Technical University of Darmstadt as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 4 source-backed claims, including 4 reviewed claims, from 3 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/technical-university-of-darmstadt.json. The entity-level confidence is 91%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Technical University of Darmstadt has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
No source-backed public claim about coursework AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about coursework, assignments, or syllabus-level AI use.
Exams
Technical University of Darmstadt has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Privacy and data entry
Technical University of Darmstadt has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
Technical University of Darmstadt has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Approved tools
No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
Named AI services
Technical University of Darmstadt has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Teaching guidance
Technical University of Darmstadt has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Teaching
TU Darmstadt provides a generative AI handreichung as orientation for students and lecturers, covering reflected, transparent use, good scientific practice, and context-specific rules for examinations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: generative-ai-orientation-for-study-and-teaching
Original evidence
Evidence 1Die TU Darmstadt stellt mit der Handreichung zu generativer KI eine Orientierungshilfe für Studierende und Lehrende bereit. Sie unterstützt dabei, KI-Hilfsmittel reflektiert, transparent und im Sinne guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis einzusetzen.
Localized display only
TU Darmstadt says its generative AI handreichung is an orientation aid for students and lecturers and supports reflected, transparent use aligned with good scientific practice.
Academic Integrity
TU Darmstadt's HDA guidance says students remain responsible for submitted work, while lecturers decide whether and how AI may be used in an examination task.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: student-responsibility-and-lecturer-determined-exam-ai-use
Original evidence
Evidence 1Wichtig ist: Die Verantwortung für eingereichte Arbeiten bleibt immer bei den Studierenden. Ob und wie KI in einer Prüfungsleistung genutzt werden darf, legen die jeweiligen Lehrenden fest.
Localized display only
Students remain responsible for submitted work; lecturers determine whether and how AI may be used in an examination task.
Privacy
TU Darmstadt's data protection page says personal data may be used in AI-related teaching only under data protection rules and identifies prompt submitters as responsible for AI-generated data protection violations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai-teaching-personal-data-under-data-protection-rules
Original evidence
Evidence 1Personenbezogene Daten dürfen nur mach den Regeln des Datenschutzes eingesetzt werden. Daten sind dann personenbezogen, wenn sie die Identifikation einer Person ermöglichen, Art. 4 Nr. 1 DSGVO. Verantwortlich für Datenschutzverletzungen in der Hochschullehre sind diejenigen, die durch Eingabe von Prompts das Erzeugen der KI-Ergebnisse anstoßen und formen.
Localized display only
Personal data may only be used under data protection rules, and the page says those who enter prompts and shape AI results are responsible for data protection violations in university teaching.
Academic Integrity
TU Darmstadt's Computer Science department treats AI tools as examination aids under APB section 22(7), says they must be listed in written work when used, and warns that undisclosed or prohibited use can trigger suspected deception under APB section 38.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: computer-science-ai-tools-as-exam-aids-disclosure
Original evidence
Evidence 1KI-Hilfsmittel sind im Sinne des §22 (7) APB als Hilfsmittel zu verstehen und müssen deshalb immer als solche in den Quellenangaben einer schriftlichen Arbeit angegeben werden. Sollten KI-Hilfsmittel trotz Verwendung nicht als Hilfsmittel angegeben oder trotz Untersagung als Hilfsmittel eingesetzt worden sein, droht die Feststellung eines Täuschungsversuchs nach §38 APB.
Localized display only
The Computer Science page says AI tools are aids under APB section 22(7), must be disclosed in written work, and undisclosed or prohibited use may trigger suspected deception under APB section 38.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
3 source attribution
Datenschutzbeauftragter
tu-darmstadt.de
Handreichung generative KI
hda.tu-darmstadt.de
KI-Hilfsmittel in Pruefungen
informatik.tu-darmstadt.de
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.