Policy presence
No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.
Bochum, Germany
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Ruhr-Universität Bochum is listed as QS 2026 rank =395. Ruhr-Universität Bochum has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 5 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
Ruhr-Universität Bochum is listed as QS 2026 rank =395. Ruhr-Universität Bochum has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 5 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Ruhr-Universität Bochum as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 6 source-backed claims, including 6 reviewed claims, from 5 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/ruhr-universitat-bochum.json. The entity-level confidence is 92%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Ruhr-Universität Bochum has 3 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
Ruhr-Universität Bochum has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
Ruhr-Universität Bochum has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
Ruhr-Universität Bochum has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Academic integrity
Ruhr-Universität Bochum has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
Ruhr-Universität Bochum has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Named AI services
Ruhr-Universität Bochum has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Teaching guidance
Ruhr-Universität Bochum has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
Ruhr-Universität Bochum has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
RUB's GPT@RUB usage directions say third-party personal data and sensitive third-party personal data may not be used as GPT@RUB input, and GPT@RUB or other AI systems may not be used for automated decision-making in examinations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: gptatrub_directions_prohibit_third_party_personal_data_input_and_automated_exam_decisions
Original evidence
Evidence 1Es durfen keine personenbezogenen Daten Dritter gem. Art. 4 Abs. 1 DSGVO als Input fur GPT@RUB verwendet werden. ... GPT@RUB und andere KI-Systeme durfen (z.B. im Kontext von Prufungen) nicht zur automatisierten Entscheidungsfindung gem. Art. 22 Abs. 2 DSGVO verwendet werden.
Localized display only
No third-party personal data may be used as GPT@RUB input; GPT@RUB and other AI systems may not be used for automated decision-making in examinations.
Academic Integrity
The English Seminar's AI guidelines require written coursework to use the seminar's declaration of authenticity, require GPT-created text passages to be marked, prohibit inserting whole GPT-created paragraphs, and state that unmarked use of GPT-generated text counts as an attempt to cheat.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: english_seminar_ai_disclosure_and_prohibition_rules
Original evidence
Evidence 1Es ist nicht zulassig, ganze Absatze von GPTs erstellen zu lassen und in den eigenen Text einzufugen. ... die ungekennzeichnete Verwendung von Text, der von einem GPT generiert wurde, stets als Tauschungsversuch und wird entsprechend geahndet.
Localized display only
The English Seminar prohibits inserting whole GPT-created paragraphs and treats unmarked GPT-generated text as an attempt to cheat.
Ai Tool Treatment
RUB's IT.SERVICES page describes GPT@RUB as an AI chat portal that offers all RUB students, staff, and lecturers reliable access to AI in everyday university life.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: central_ai_chat_portal_available_to_rub_users
Original evidence
Evidence 1GPT@RUB offers all RUB students, staff and lecturers reliable access to artificial intelligence in everyday university life.
Academic Integrity
The Geography Institute's AI guidelines say students may use AI-supported tools for topic development and language improvement, but AI-generated subject content, figures, and tables must be marked; otherwise this is treated as an attempt to cheat.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: geography_institute_ai_use_allowed_with_disclosure
Original evidence
Evidence 1fachliche Inhalte und Darstellungen einschl. Abbildungen und Tabellen, die mit einem KI-Tool erstellt wurden, als solche kenntlich machen mussen, da ansonsten ein Tauschungsversuch vorliegt und Studien- und Prufungsleistungen nicht bestanden werden
Localized display only
AI-generated subject content, figures, and tables must be marked; otherwise this is treated as an attempt to cheat and the work is failed.
Privacy
The GPT@RUB privacy notice says RUB IDs are stored on the server and not transmitted to OpenAI, chat entries are forwarded to OpenAI without identifiers and IP addresses visible to OpenAI, and personal data from third parties should not be used in chat.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: gptatrub_privacy_notice_limits_identifiers_and_third_party_personal_data
Original evidence
Evidence 1Your RUB ID and password are required for login. The RUB ID is also stored on the server and is not transmitted to OpenAI. There is no user account assigned to individual users at OpenAI.
Teaching
RUB's ZfW FAQ says generative AI tools can be used at RUB in research, teaching, and study, but that use can be restricted or tied to disclosure requirements in certain contexts such as written examinations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: generative_ai_use_allowed_but_contextually_restrictable
Original evidence
Evidence 1Ja: Generative KI-Tools konnen an der RUB in Forschung, Lehre und Studium genutzt werden. Diese Nutzung kann aber in bestimmten Kontexten (zum Beispiel bei schriftlichen Prufungen) eingeschrankt oder mit Kennzeichnungspflichten verbunden werden.
Localized display only
Generative AI tools can be used at RUB in research, teaching, and study, but use can be restricted or tied to disclosure requirements in certain contexts.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
5 source attribution
GPT@RUB
it-services.ruhr-uni-bochum.de
Kunstliche Intelligenz in Studium & Lehre
zfw.rub.de
Nutzung Kunstlicher Intelligenz am Geographischen Institut der Ruhr-Universitat Bochum
geographie.ruhr-uni-bochum.de
Nutzungshinweise GPT@RUB
zfw.rub.de
Richtlinien des Englischen Seminars zum Umgang mit Kunstlicher Intelligenz
es.ruhr-uni-bochum.de
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.