Bonn, Germany

Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn

Last checkedMay 15, 2026Last changedMay 15, 2026Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Public JSON Change log Monthly report Citation rules Dataset access Analysis JSON Submit correction

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage5 reviewedEvidence-backed claims5Reviewed5Candidate0Official sources3Source languagedePublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/rheinische-friedrich-wilhelms-universitat-bonn.json

Coverage score60/100Coverage labelmoderate public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence75%

Policy presence

No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coursework

Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn has 1 source-backed public claim for coursework; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.

Conditionally AllowedMachine candidateConfidence71%Evidence1Sources1

Claim claim-rfwub-vnd-ai-teaching-projects

Exams

Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence4Sources3

Claim claim-rfwub-philfak-unauthorized-ai-5 Claim claim-rfwub-philfak-ai-permission Claim claim-rfwub-bzl-chatgpt-written-work

Privacy and data entry

Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn has 3 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.

Conditionally AllowedMachine candidateConfidence76%Evidence3Sources2

Claim claim-rfwub-philfak-unauthorized-ai-5 Claim claim-rfwub-philfak-ai-permission Claim claim-rfwub-vnd-falko-privacy

Academic integrity

Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence79%Evidence3Sources2

Claim claim-rfwub-philfak-unauthorized-ai-5 Claim claim-rfwub-philfak-ai-permission Claim claim-rfwub-bzl-chatgpt-written-work

Approved tools

No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Named AI services

Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence74%Evidence2Sources2

Claim claim-rfwub-bzl-chatgpt-written-work Claim claim-rfwub-vnd-falko-privacy

Teaching guidance

Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn has 4 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence75%Evidence4Sources2

Claim claim-rfwub-philfak-unauthorized-ai-5 Claim claim-rfwub-philfak-ai-permission Claim claim-rfwub-vnd-ai-teaching-projects

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Normalized value: philfak_unauthorized_ai_attempted_deception_5_0

Last checked: May 15, 2026
Last changed: May 15, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1

Erfolgt eine Verwendung von KI ohne Freigabe der Prüfer*innen, wird die Leistung als Täuschungsversuch betrachtet und mit einer 5,0 bewertet.
Source: Täuschungsversuch und Plagiat

Localized display only

Use of AI without examiner approval is treated as attempted deception and graded 5.0.

Source language: de
Snapshot hash: 94e454d319d1d70845197ab602e727eda6c28d52edc98b46d898d58ff1718179
Retrieved: May 15, 2026
Evidence locator: Section: Darf KI in Prüfungen verwendet werden?

Normalized value: philfak_ai_only_if_explicitly_permitted

Last checked: May 15, 2026
Last changed: May 15, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1

Nur wenn dieses Hilfsmittel explizit und einheitlich für alle Prüflinge einer Kohorte (bzw. eines Seminars) von den Prüfer*innen zugelassen wurde, darf KI von den Studierenden verwendet werden.
Source: Täuschungsversuch und Plagiat

Localized display only

Students may use AI only if examiners explicitly and uniformly allow it for all examinees in the cohort or seminar.

Source language: de
Snapshot hash: 94e454d319d1d70845197ab602e727eda6c28d52edc98b46d898d58ff1718179
Retrieved: May 15, 2026
Evidence locator: Section: Darf KI in Prüfungen verwendet werden?

Normalized value: bzl_ai_written_work_requires_examiner_permission

Last checked: May 15, 2026
Last changed: May 15, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1

Bitte beachten Sie, dass die Verwendung von KI (Anwendungen wie ChatGPT) bei der Erstellung von schriftlichen Arbeiten verboten ist! Es handelt sich um ein unzulässiges Hilfsmittel, sofern die Verwendung nicht ausdrücklich durch die Prüfer*innen erlaubt wurde.
Source: Täuschungsversuche und Plagiate

Localized display only

Use of AI such as ChatGPT for written work is prohibited unless examiners explicitly allow it; otherwise it is an unauthorized aid.

Source language: de
Snapshot hash: 62c468c4e1f3830f81b0ad073a0bc6f5155659fe4fb966300ecd810f83b5357a
Retrieved: May 15, 2026
Evidence locator: Introductory warning before Grundlagen section

Normalized value: vnd_supports_ai_supported_teaching_project_falko

Last checked: May 15, 2026
Last changed: May 15, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1

Unter dem Titel vielfältig.nachhaltig.digital werden inzwischen universitätsweit zahlreiche Vorhaben gefördert, die innovative Impulse für eine qualitativ hochwertige Lehre setzen. Das Projekt FALKO adressiert Studierende des Bachelor-/Masterprogramms „Lehramt an Berufskollegs“ ... Geplant ist die Entwicklung eines KI-gestützten Lernbegleiters (Chatbots).
Source: Vielfalt, Nachhaltigkeit und digitale Lehre im Fokus

Localized display only

The VND funding line supports university-wide teaching projects; FALKO plans an AI-supported learning companion or chatbot for teacher education students.

Source language: de
Snapshot hash: b2cee1a0f8b18e67ed41a1c61c71e72bb2b45c45f19120d495ade393a9c346d2
Retrieved: May 15, 2026
Evidence locator: Sections: Förderlinie 'vielfältig.nachhaltig.digital'; Fachdidaktischer Assistent in der Lernfeld- und Kompetenzorientierung (FALKO)

Normalized value: falko_training_implementation_datenschutzkonform_eu_ai_act

Last checked: May 15, 2026
Last changed: May 15, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1

Ziel des Projektes ist die Entwicklung eines qualitativ hochwertigen, fachdidaktisch fundierten Datensatzes, der die Grundlage für das Fine-Tuning des Mistral Small 3.1 27B Modells bildet. Training und die Implementierung erfolgen datenschutzkonform gemäß EU AI Act.
Source: Vielfalt, Nachhaltigkeit und digitale Lehre im Fokus

Localized display only

The FALKO project aims to create a dataset for fine-tuning Mistral Small 3.1 27B; training and implementation are described as data-protection-compliant under the EU AI Act.

Source language: de
Snapshot hash: b2cee1a0f8b18e67ed41a1c61c71e72bb2b45c45f19120d495ade393a9c346d2
Retrieved: May 15, 2026
Evidence locator: Section: Fachdidaktischer Assistent in der Lernfeld- und Kompetenzorientierung (FALKO)

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

3 source attribution

Täuschungsversuch und Plagiat

philfak.uni-bonn.de

Source URL: https://www.philfak.uni-bonn.de/de/studium/pruefungsamt/im-studium/taeuschungsversuch-und-plagiat
Snapshot hash: 94e454d319d1d70845197ab602e727eda6c28d52edc98b46d898d58ff1718179

Täuschungsversuche und Plagiate

bzl.uni-bonn.de

Source URL: https://www.bzl.uni-bonn.de/studium/pruefungen/taeuschungsversuche
Snapshot hash: 62c468c4e1f3830f81b0ad073a0bc6f5155659fe4fb966300ecd810f83b5357a

Vielfalt, Nachhaltigkeit und digitale Lehre im Fokus

uni-bonn.de

Source URL: https://www.uni-bonn.de/de/forschung-lehre/angebote-fuer-forschende-und-lehrende/foerderungen-fuer-lehre/vnd
Snapshot hash: b2cee1a0f8b18e67ed41a1c61c71e72bb2b45c45f19120d495ade393a9c346d2

Last checkedMay 15, 2026Last changedMay 15, 2026Open change log

Open contribution paths Review workflow

Back to universities

Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn

Record status

Policy profile

Policy presence

AI disclosure

Coursework

Exams

Privacy and data entry

Academic integrity

Approved tools

Named AI services

Teaching guidance

Research guidance

Security and procurement

AI tools

Evidence-backed claims

For the Philosophical Faculty, the page says use of AI without examiner approval is treated as attempted deception and graded 5.0.

For Philosophical Faculty examinations, the page says AI may be used by students only when explicitly and uniformly permitted for all examinees in a cohort or seminar.

For Bonner Zentrum für Lehrer*innenbildung written work, the page says use of AI applications such as ChatGPT is prohibited unless explicitly allowed by examiners, and otherwise is an unauthorized aid.

The central VND teaching-funding page says the University of Bonn supports university-wide teaching projects and lists FALKO as an AI-supported learning companion for teacher education.

For the FALKO teaching project, the central VND page says model training and implementation are to be data-protection-compliant under the EU AI Act.

Candidate claims

Official sources

Täuschungsversuch und Plagiat

Täuschungsversuche und Plagiate

Vielfalt, Nachhaltigkeit und digitale Lehre im Fokus

Change log

Corrections