Osaka, Japan

Osaka Metropolitan University

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage2 reviewedEvidence-backed claims2Reviewed2Candidate0Official sources2Source languagejaPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/osaka-metropolitan-university.json

Policy profile

Coverage score40/100Coverage labelpartial public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence76%

Policy presence

No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Privacy and data entry

No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Academic integrity

No source-backed public claim about academic-integrity treatment of AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about AI use under academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

2 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Ai Tool Treatment

Osaka Metropolitan University's student generative-AI guideline recommends using generative AI to deepen learning or research and improve efficiency, while following any restrictions or prohibitions given by course or research supervisors.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: student_guideline_recommends_responsible_ai_use_subject_to_instructor_limits

Original evidence

Evidence 1
本学での学びや研究を自分自身で深めたい場合や、学習効率・研究効率を高めたい場合に、生成AIを 活用することを、本学としては推奨します。 ただし、授業担当教員や研究指導教員から、生成AIの利用制限や禁止が指示されている場合は、その指示に従ってください。

Localized display only

The guideline recommends using generative AI to deepen learning/research or improve efficiency, while following any course or research supervisor restrictions.

Teaching

Osaka Metropolitan University's faculty guide says instructors need to judge and explain to students the permitted scope of AI-tool use for assignments such as reports.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: faculty_judges_and_explains_assignment_ai_use_scope

Original evidence

Evidence 1
課題レポート作成などでの使用をどこまで認めるか教員が判断し、学生に伝えるということが必要です。

Localized display only

The faculty guide says instructors need to decide how far to permit AI-tool use for assignments such as reports and communicate that to students.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

2 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 22, 2026Last changedMay 22, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities