Policy presence
No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.
Osaka, Japan
No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Osaka Metropolitan University has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Osaka Metropolitan University has 2 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
No source-backed public claim about academic-integrity treatment of AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about AI use under academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.
Osaka Metropolitan University has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Osaka Metropolitan University has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Osaka Metropolitan University has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Osaka Metropolitan University has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
2 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: student_guideline_recommends_responsible_ai_use_subject_to_instructor_limits
Original evidence
Evidence 1本学での学びや研究を自分自身で深めたい場合や、学習効率・研究効率を高めたい場合に、生成AIを 活用することを、本学としては推奨します。 ただし、授業担当教員や研究指導教員から、生成AIの利用制限や禁止が指示されている場合は、その指示に従ってください。
Localized display only
The guideline recommends using generative AI to deepen learning/research or improve efficiency, while following any course or research supervisor restrictions.
Teaching
Normalized value: faculty_judges_and_explains_assignment_ai_use_scope
Original evidence
Evidence 1課題レポート作成などでの使用をどこまで認めるか教員が判断し、学生に伝えるということが必要です。
Localized display only
The faculty guide says instructors need to decide how far to permit AI-tool use for assignments such as reports and communicate that to students.
0 machine or needs-review claim
2 source attribution
omu.ac.jp
omu.ac.jp