Policy presence
No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.
Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.
Osaka, Japan
Osaka Metropolitan University has 2 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 2 reviewed claims. Last checked May 22, 2026.
v1 public contract
Osaka Metropolitan University has 2 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions, including 2 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 22, 2026. Discovery context: Osaka Metropolitan University is listed as QS 2026 rank 901-950.
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Osaka Metropolitan University as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 22, 2026 and last changed on May 22, 2026. The record contains 2 source-backed claims, including 2 reviewed claims, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/osaka-metropolitan-university.json. The entity-level confidence is 90%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Osaka Metropolitan University has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Osaka Metropolitan University has 2 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
No source-backed public claim about academic-integrity treatment of AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about AI use under academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.
Osaka Metropolitan University has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Osaka Metropolitan University has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Osaka Metropolitan University has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Osaka Metropolitan University has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
2 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: student_guideline_recommends_responsible_ai_use_subject_to_instructor_limits
Original evidence
Evidence 1本学での学びや研究を自分自身で深めたい場合や、学習効率・研究効率を高めたい場合に、生成AIを 活用することを、本学としては推奨します。 ただし、授業担当教員や研究指導教員から、生成AIの利用制限や禁止が指示されている場合は、その指示に従ってください。
Localized display only
The guideline recommends using generative AI to deepen learning/research or improve efficiency, while following any course or research supervisor restrictions.
Teaching
Normalized value: faculty_judges_and_explains_assignment_ai_use_scope
Original evidence
Evidence 1課題レポート作成などでの使用をどこまで認めるか教員が判断し、学生に伝えるということが必要です。
Localized display only
The faculty guide says instructors need to decide how far to permit AI-tool use for assignments such as reports and communicate that to students.
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
2 source attribution
omu.ac.jp
omu.ac.jp
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.