Policy presence
National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute" has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Kyiv, Ukraine
National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute"
National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute" has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 3 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 5 reviewed claims. Last checked May 20, 2026.
National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute" AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute" has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 3 official source attributions, including 5 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 20, 2026. Discovery context: National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute" is listed as QS 2026 rank 801-850.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute" as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 20, 2026 and last changed on May 20, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 3 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/national-technical-university-of-ukraine-igor-sikorsky-kyiv-polytechnic-institute.json. The entity-level confidence is 97%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Source status claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute" has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coursework
National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute" has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute" has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute" has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute" has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute" has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute" has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute" has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Source Status
KPI has a policy titled "Policy on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Academic Activity at KPI" that was approved by the KPI Academic Council on 11 December 2023.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_policy_approved_2023_12_11
Original evidence
Evidence 1Політика використання штучного інтелекту для академічної діяльності в КПІ ім. Ігоря Сікорського. Ухвалено Вченою радою КПІ ім. Ігоря Сікорського 11 грудня 2023 р. (протокол №11).
Localized display only
Policy on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Academic Activity at KPI. Approved by the KPI Academic Council on 11 December 2023, protocol No. 11.
Academic Integrity
KPI recognizes presenting AI-generated text or AI-paraphrased content from other sources as one's own work without proper source indication as academically dishonest and as plagiarism.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_generated_or_paraphrased_text_as_own_work_is_plagiarism
Original evidence
Evidence 1В університеті визнається академічно нечесним такі способи використання моделей ШІ, які порушують принципи доброчесності та етики досліджень, наприклад: Видання тексту, згенерованого ШІ або перефразованого ШІ вмісту інших джерел, за власну роботу. Використання ШІ для автоматичної генерації текстів або перефразування наявного контенту без належного вказання джерел порушує принципи авторства та вважається плагіатом.
Localized display only
KPI recognizes presenting AI-generated text or AI-paraphrased source content as one's own work without proper source indication as academically dishonest and as plagiarism.
Teaching
KPI's AI policy says academic and educational participants should acknowledge and record the use of generative AI, and that instructors may set course-specific AI-use restrictions in the syllabus when needed for learning outcomes.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_use_disclosure_and_syllabus_restrictions
Original evidence
Evidence 1суб'єктам наукового та освітнього процесу необхідно визнавати та відповідним чином фіксувати факти використання генеративного ШІ; кожен НПП, в рамках академічної свободи, має право встановлювати певні обмеження щодо використання ШІ в процесі опанування відповідної навчальної дисципліни (розділ “Політика навчальної дисципліни” в силабусі), якщо це необхідно для досягнення визначених результатів навчання.
Localized display only
Academic and educational participants should acknowledge and record generative AI use; each instructor may set course-specific AI-use restrictions in the syllabus when needed for learning outcomes.
Ai Tool Treatment
KPI supports rational experimentation with generative AI tools for academic activity when information security, data confidentiality, copyright, and academic integrity are considered.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: conditional_support_for_generative_ai_experimentation
Original evidence
Evidence 1Університет підтримує раціональне експериментування з генеративними інструментами ШІ, але за умови врахування важливих аспектів використання таких інструментів, зокрема: інформаційної безпеки, конфіденційності даних, дотримання вимог авторського права та академічної доброчесності.
Localized display only
The university supports rational experimentation with generative AI tools, provided important aspects such as information security, data confidentiality, copyright, and academic integrity are considered.
Privacy
KPI's AI guidance tells users not to enter personal or confidential information into AI tools because AI stores those data.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: do_not_enter_personal_or_confidential_information_into_ai
Original evidence
Evidence 1Використовуючи інструменти ШІ потрібно: Не вводити особисту або конфіденційну інформацію, оскільки ШІ зберігає ці дані.
Localized display only
When using AI tools, do not enter personal or confidential information because AI stores those data.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
3 source attribution
Академічна доброчесність
kpi.ua
Використання ШІ для академічної діяльності
library.kpi.ua
Політика використання штучного інтелекту для академічної діяльності в КПІ ім. Ігоря Сікорського
ela.kpi.ua
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.