University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPL

Kyiv, Ukraine

Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

Last checkedMay 18, 2026Last changedMay 18, 2026Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%
Public JSONChange logMonthly reportCitation rulesDataset accessAnalysis JSONSubmit correction
Public JSONCitation rules
More tools

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage5 reviewedEvidence-backed claims5Reviewed5Candidate0Official sources1Source languageukPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/taras-shevchenko-national-university-of-kyiv.json

Policy profile

Analysis JSONAnalysis review
Coverage score100/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence78%

Policy presence

Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.

UnclearMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1
Claim claim-knu-ai-personal-data-confidentiality

Privacy and data entry

Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.

BlockedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1
Claim claim-knu-ai-personal-data-confidentiality

Approved tools

Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.

AllowedMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence1Sources1
Claim claim-knu-ai-policy-mandatory-scope

Teaching guidance

Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1
Claim claim-knu-ai-permission-levels

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Tools directory
Derived tool records1

AI tools

Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

Tool
AI tools
About
Not specified
Access
Not specified
Cost
Not specified
Availability
Unknown
Review
Agent reviewed
Sources
Source 1

Evidence-backed claims

5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Ai Tool Treatment

KNU has a university-level regulation on use of artificial intelligence in educational programs that applies to participants in the educational process and covers generative AI during educational program implementation.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: university-level AI use regulation for educational programs

Last checked
May 18, 2026
Last changed
May 18, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Положення про використання штучного інтелекту при реалізації освітніх програм у КНУ імені Тараса Шевченка ... є обов’язковим для всіх учасників освітнього процесу Університету та визначає засади й принципи використання засобів штучного інтелекту.

Localized display only

The regulation is mandatory for participants in the university educational process and sets principles for using AI tools.

Source language
uk
Snapshot hash
08c4fb1891fcdc86a8ddfaddf420103fd3a4dd302eb5dffb8903f87348f2bf1b
Retrieved
May 18, 2026
Evidence locator
Sections 1.1.1 and 1.2

Academic Integrity

Where KNU educational components allow generative AI under levels 2 or 3, the regulation requires students to declare the fact and manner of generative AI use in submitted artifacts for assessment.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: declaration required for allowed generative AI use in assessed work

Last checked
May 18, 2026
Last changed
May 18, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Усі випадки використання генеративного штучного інтелекту ... під час виконання оцінюваних навчальних завдань підлягають обов’язковому декларуванню здобувачем освіти ... Декларування факту та способу використання генеративного штучного інтелекту є обов’язковим для освітніх компонентів, у яких встановлено рівні використання штучного інтелекту 2 або 3.

Localized display only

For components using permission levels 2 or 3, students must declare the fact and manner of generative AI use for assessed work.

Source language
uk
Snapshot hash
08c4fb1891fcdc86a8ddfaddf420103fd3a4dd302eb5dffb8903f87348f2bf1b
Retrieved
May 18, 2026
Evidence locator
Sections 5.1 and 5.2

Academic Integrity

KNU's regulation treats violations of generative AI use rules as academic-integrity violations and lists non-declaration, presenting generated content as one's own result, and using generative AI for unfair advantage among possible violations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: AI rule violations handled as academic integrity violations

Last checked
May 18, 2026
Last changed
May 18, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Порушення правил використання генеративного штучного інтелекту ... недекларування ... подання згенерованого контенту як власного результату ... використання генеративного штучного інтелекту для отримання неправомірної переваги ... Порушення правил використання генеративного штучного інтелекту кваліфікується як порушення академічної доброчесності.

Localized display only

The regulation classifies violations of generative AI use rules as academic-integrity violations and lists examples such as non-declaration and presenting generated content as one's own.

Source language
uk
Snapshot hash
08c4fb1891fcdc86a8ddfaddf420103fd3a4dd302eb5dffb8903f87348f2bf1b
Retrieved
May 18, 2026
Evidence locator
Sections 7.1 and 7.2

Teaching

For assessed educational work, KNU's regulation uses defined permission levels for generative AI; level 1 prohibits generative AI for assessed tasks, while levels 2 and 3 allow use only within the conditions set for the educational component.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: level-based generative AI permissions for assessed work

Last checked
May 18, 2026
Last changed
May 18, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
В освітньому процесі використання генеративного штучного інтелекту здійснюється відповідно до одного з установлених рівнів дозволу ... Рівень 1: Повна заборона ... Заборонено: будь-яке використання генеративного штучного інтелекту для виконання завдань, що підлягають оцінюванню.

Localized display only

The regulation sets permission levels for generative AI, including a level that fully prohibits generative AI use for assessed tasks.

Source language
uk
Snapshot hash
08c4fb1891fcdc86a8ddfaddf420103fd3a4dd302eb5dffb8903f87348f2bf1b
Retrieved
May 18, 2026
Evidence locator
Sections 3.2 and 3.2.1

Privacy

KNU's AI regulation says AI use should respect confidentiality and protect personal data, and it prohibits sending personal, confidential, or official information to AI systems without proper legal grounds.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: personal data and confidentiality restriction for AI tools

Last checked
May 18, 2026
Last changed
May 18, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Конфіденційність. Використання систем штучного інтелекту повинно здійснюватися ... забезпечуючи конфіденційність персональних даних ... Заборонено: ... передання до систем штучного інтелекту персональних даних, конфіденційної або службової інформації без належних правових підстав.

Localized display only

The regulation ties AI use to confidentiality and personal-data protection, and bars sending personal, confidential, or official information without proper legal grounds.

Source language
uk
Snapshot hash
08c4fb1891fcdc86a8ddfaddf420103fd3a4dd302eb5dffb8903f87348f2bf1b
Retrieved
May 18, 2026
Evidence locator
Sections 2.1 and 3.2.2

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

1 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 18, 2026Last changedMay 18, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Open contribution pathsReview workflow
Back to universities