Policy presence
No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.
Nagasaki City, Japan
Nagasaki University
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Coursework
Nagasaki University has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
Nagasaki University has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
Nagasaki University has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
Nagasaki University has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
Nagasaki University has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: required.
Named AI services
Nagasaki University has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
Nagasaki University has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
Nagasaki University has 2 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
AI tools
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
Evidence-backed claims
4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Nagasaki University's student notice prohibits diverting content obtained from generative AI into reports or degree theses, and says instructors may impose strict measures such as a zero grade for violations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: no_generative_ai_content_diversion_in_reports_theses
Original evidence
Evidence 1本学においては，レポートや学位論文等の作成に生成系 AI から得た内容を流用することは不可としま す。違反があった場合は，成績評価点をゼロにするなどの厳格な対応を授業担当教員の判断で行うことと します。
Localized display only
At Nagasaki University, diverting content obtained from generative AI into reports or degree theses is not allowed; instructors may take strict measures such as assigning a zero grade.
Privacy
Nagasaki University's student notice warns that entering unpublished papers or confidential information, including personal or privacy information, into generative AI may cause unintended information outflow or leakage.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: avoid_confidential_personal_unpublished_information_in_ai_inputs
Original evidence
Evidence 1(4) 未発表の論文や秘密にすべき情報（個人情報やプライバシー情報等）を生成系 AI に入力してしまうと、 それらの情報が意図せずに流出・漏えいしてしまう可能性がある。サイバーセキュリティの観点からも 大いに注意が必要である。
Localized display only
Entering unpublished papers or confidential information, including personal and privacy information, into generative AI may unintentionally cause information outflow or leakage.
Teaching
Nagasaki University's student notice tells students to pay careful attention to listed risks and follow the course instructor's instructions for generative AI use in classes and similar settings.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: students_follow_instructor_instructions_for_ai_use
Original evidence
Evidence 1さらに，下記について十分な注意を払うとともに，授業等でのその利用については授業担当教員の指示 に従ってください。
Localized display only
Students are asked to pay careful attention to the listed points and follow the course instructor's instructions when using generative AI in classes and similar settings.
Ai Tool Treatment
Nagasaki University's student notice says generative AI outputs used for research or inquiry may contain errors, so students need to confirm accurate information under their own responsibility.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: students_responsible_for_confirming_accuracy_of_ai_outputs
Original evidence
Evidence 1(2) 調べ学習等で使用する場合に誤りが含まれていることも少なくなく，自己責任のもとで正確な情報の 確認が必要となる。
Localized display only
When using generative AI for research or inquiry, outputs often include errors, and students need to confirm accurate information under their own responsibility.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
2 source attribution
ChatGPT 等生成系 AI への対応について
nagasaki-u.ac.jp
ChatGPT等生成系AIへの対応｜授業関係｜教育・学生生活｜長崎大学
nagasaki-u.ac.jp