Policy presence
Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Mainz, Germany
Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz
Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz is listed as QS 2026 rank =452. Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz is listed as QS 2026 rank =452. Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 4 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/johannes-gutenberg-universitat-mainz.json. The entity-level confidence is 91%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Evidence includes Source status claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Exams
Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Privacy and data entry
Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Named AI services
Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz has 3 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Ai Tool Treatment
JGU provides a ZDV-operated KI-Chat service for students and employees with a JGU account, and the ZDV page says data remains inside JGU except when web search is enabled.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: jgu_account_ai_chat_service_zdv_hosted_with_web_search_exception
Original evidence
Evidence 1Das ZDV stellt für die JGU einen KI-Dienst zur Verfügung. Dieser umfasst verschiedene große Sprachmodelle. Voraussetzung ist ein JGU-Account, den Sie für die Anmeldung benötigen. Der KI-Chat steht Mitarbeitenden und Studierenden zur Verfügung.
Localized display only
The ZDV provides an AI service for JGU with several LLMs; access requires a JGU account and is available to employees and students.
Original evidence
Evidence 2Das ZDV kontrolliert und hostet den Dienst selbst, so bleiben die Daten (außer bei der Websuche) innerhalb der JGU.
Localized display only
The ZDV controls and hosts the service itself, so data remains within JGU except for web search.
Academic Integrity
JGU library guidance says the university is generally open to AI tools, but instructors or institutes may decide whether tools are allowed for a given assessment, and allowed use should be disclosed as an aid.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_tools_open_but_assessment_permission_and_disclosure_required_when_allowed
Original evidence
Evidence 1Die Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz (JGU) ist prinzipiell offen gegenüber der Nutzung von KI-Tools. Allerdings kann jedes Institut, jeder und jede Dozierende für die jeweilige Prüfungsleistung selbst festlegen, ob KI-Tools genutzt werden dürfen oder nicht.
Localized display only
JGU is generally open to AI tools, but each institute or instructor may decide whether tools may be used for a specific assessment.
Original evidence
Evidence 2Momentan gelten diese als Hilfsmittel, die man angeben muss, vorausgesetzt die Verwendung in der wissenschaftlichen Arbeit ist erlaubt.
Localized display only
The page says AI tools currently count as aids that must be indicated, provided their use in the academic work is allowed.
Privacy
JGU library guidance warns AI-tool users to check legal and privacy conditions, avoid disclosing private or sensitive data, and consider server location, publisher restrictions, rights, and upload permissions.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: privacy_guidance_avoid_sensitive_data_and_check_rights
Original evidence
Evidence 1Wenn Sie ein KI-Tool nutzen, sollten Sie sich gut über die rechtlichen Rahmenbedingungen und Datenschutzrichtlinien informieren. Folgendes gilt es zu beachten: ... Geben Sie keine privaten oder sensiblen Daten preis.
Localized display only
The page advises users to understand legal and privacy conditions and not disclose private or sensitive data.
Teaching
JGU's digital teaching guidance encourages integrating AI literacy and transparent use of AI into teaching and, where appropriate, assessment design.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: teaching_guidance_encourages_ai_literacy_transparency
Original evidence
Evidence 1KI in Lehre und Studium integrieren: Fachbereiche und Fächer evaluieren Studiengänge und Studienangebote kritisch, um Raum für die Reflexion und fachspezifische Anwendung von KI zu integrieren.
Localized display only
The guidance recommends that departments critically evaluate study programs to create room for reflection and subject-specific AI use.
Original evidence
Evidence 2AI Literacy (mit)prüfen: Lehrende passen Prüfungen (im Rahmen der POs) an, um einen transparenten KI-Ansatz – wo angemessen – möglich zu machen und zugleich dessen sinnvollen Einsatz mit zu prüfen.
Localized display only
The assessment section recommends adapting exams, within examination regulations, to allow a transparent AI approach where appropriate and assess meaningful use.
Source Status
This crawl found official JGU AI recommendations and guidance pages, but did not find a central binding university-wide AI policy page; the main digital teaching source itself frames concrete recommendations as provisional.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: official_guidance_found_no_central_binding_policy_found
Original evidence
Evidence 1Angesichts der rasanten Entwicklung müssen Empfehlungen, wo sie konkreter werden, vorläufig bleiben.
Localized display only
Given rapid development, the page states that recommendations must remain provisional where they become more concrete.
Original evidence
Evidence 2Die Koordinierungsstelle Digitales Lehren und Lernen (KODI) unterstützt Lehrende und Studierende im Umgang mit KI in der Hochschulbildung - mit regelmäßigen Informations- und Diskussionsveranstaltungen, durch (individuelle) Beratung und durch die Entwicklung und Abstimmung von Empfehlungen und Leitfäden zum Umgang mit KI in Studium und Lehre.
Localized display only
KODI supports teachers and students with AI through events, advice, and development and coordination of recommendations and guides.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
4 source attribution
KI an der JGU
zdv.uni-mainz.de
KI in der Hochschulbildung
digitale-lehre.uni-mainz.de
Maßnahmen und Empfehlungen für KI in der Hochschulbildung
digitale-lehre.uni-mainz.de
Nutzung von KI-Tools
ub.uni-mainz.de
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.