Policy presence
No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.
Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.
Mexico City, Mexico
Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM) has 2 source-backed AI policy claims from 1 official source attribution. Review state: agent reviewed; 2 reviewed claims. Last checked May 20, 2026.
v1 public contract
Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM) has 2 source-backed AI policy claims from 1 official source attribution, including 2 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 20, 2026. Discovery context: Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM) is listed as QS 2026 rank 801-850.
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM) as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 20, 2026 and last changed on May 20, 2026. The record contains 2 source-backed claims, including 2 reviewed claims, from 1 official source attribution. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/instituto-tecnologico-autonomo-de-mexico-itam.json. The entity-level confidence is 82%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.
Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM) has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM) has 1 source-backed public claim for coursework; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM) has 2 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM) has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
No source-backed public claim about academic-integrity treatment of AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about AI use under academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.
Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM) has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM) has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM) has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM) has 2 source-backed public claims for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
2 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Teaching
Normalized value: epic_lab_professor_generative_ai_teaching_sessions
Original evidence
Evidence 1El objetivo general de estas sesiones es desarrollar competencias docentes para integrar herramientas de inteligencia artificial generativa en el diseño, impartición y seguimiento de clases centradas en el estudiante, utilizando la IA como apoyo a la autonomía, la creatividad y la reflexión.
Localized display only
The sessions aim to develop teaching competencies for integrating generative AI tools into student-centered class design, delivery, and follow-up.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: epic_lab_ai_tools_classroom_examples
Original evidence
Evidence 17 nov | ChatGPT (GPT-5) ... Diseñar un GPT que actúe como asistente de aprendizaje o tutor virtual para su curso. 14 nov | NotebookLM ... Usar IA para resumir, comparar y generar materiales de clase a partir de documentos del profesor. 5 dic | Notion AI + Elicit ... Capturar acuerdos, dudas, próximos pasos y generar resúmenes automáticos de cada clase + Revisión de literatura.
Localized display only
The event lists ChatGPT/GPT-5, NotebookLM, and Notion AI + Elicit examples for learning assistance, class-material generation, class summaries, and literature review.
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
1 source attribution
epiclab.itam.mx
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.