Mexico City, Mexico

Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM)

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Reviewed claims

8 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Asistente IA CUAED is listed for Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%

Normalized value: {"tool":"institutional_ai_service","rawToolName":"Asistente IA CUAED","description":"UNAM CUAED's authenticated AI assistant service.","howToObtain":"Sign in with the same account created for Aulas Virtuales CUAED, or register there first.","costToUser":"Not stated on the official login page.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The official UNAM Asistente IA CUAED university service provides access through a live login, says the account is the same one generated in Aulas Virtuales CUAED, links to registration, and identifies the UNAM Coordinación de Universidad Abierta y Educación Digital.

Localized display only

The official UNAM Asistente IA CUAED university service provides access through a live login, says the account is the same one generated in Aulas Virtuales CUAED, links to registration, and identifies the UNAM Coordinación de Universidad Abierta y Educación Digital.

Privacy

UNAM's 2025 education recommendations advise faculty using generative AI in teaching to avoid entering personal or sensitive information into AI platforms and to orient students and colleagues about data privacy.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Protección de datos y privacidad. Evita proporcionar información personal o sensible en plataformas de IAGen y asegura el cumplimiento de las normativas de privacidad. Orienta al estudiantado, así como a tus colegas, acerca de la importancia de la privacidad de los datos y cómo las distintas plataformas los procesan.

Localized display only

Data protection and privacy: avoid providing personal or sensitive information in GenAI platforms and orient students and colleagues about data privacy.

Academic Integrity

For assessment, UNAM's 2025 recommendations advise faculty to define the level of generative-AI incorporation and, when AI use is allowed, ask students to provide the prompts/instructions and generated responses for review.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Definir su nivel de incorporación. Es importante determinar en qué medida utilizar la IAGen en función de los conocimientos y habilidades que se desean evaluar. ... En aquellos casos en los que se permita el uso de IAGen, solicita que el estudiantado proporcione las instrucciones y respuestas generadas por la herramienta para valorarlas.

Localized display only

Define the level of GenAI incorporation for the knowledge and skills being assessed; when allowed, ask students to provide prompts/instructions and generated responses.

Academic Integrity

UNAM's 2025 recommendations advise designing strategies for undeclared generative-AI use and caution against indiscriminate use of AI detectors because their effectiveness is questioned and they raise privacy concerns.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Diseñar estrategias que prevengan y atiendan el uso no declarado de la IAGen. ... Evitar el uso indiscriminado de detectores de IAGen. Actualmente, su eficacia es cuestionada y plantea preocupaciones de privacidad.

Localized display only

Design strategies for undeclared GenAI use and avoid indiscriminate AI-detector use because effectiveness is questioned and privacy concerns exist.

Academic Integrity

UNAM's 2023 teaching recommendations suggest that faculty clearly specify acceptable and unacceptable ChatGPT use, require recognition and documentation of AI-tool use, and emphasize user responsibility for submitted academic products.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Asimismo, establecer la necesidad de reconocer y documentar cómo se utilizó la herramienta y qué acciones se tomaron para decidir la permanencia o no del contenido creado por estas herramientas, así como enfatizar la responsabilidad final del usuario sobre los productos académicos que se entreguen a revisión.

Localized display only

Establish the need to recognize and document how the tool was used and emphasize the user's final responsibility for academic products submitted for review.

Ai Tool Treatment

UNAM's 2025 GAIA-GEN document frames its generative-AI education content as recommendations for informed, ethical, and critical use, not as a rigid prescriptive framework.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Estas recomendaciones aspiran a ser elementos que detonen en la comunidad universitaria (profesorado, estudiantado, funcionariado) creatividad y apropiación crítica de estas tecnologías, no pretenden ser marcos rígidos que intenten prescribir el trabajo académico respecto a la IAGen.

Localized display only

These recommendations are intended to encourage critical appropriation, not to be rigid frameworks prescribing academic work with GenAI.

Research

The 2025 UNAM DGTIC ethics diagnostic frames transparency in AI-mediated research as clearly stating whether AI tools were used in questions, hypotheses, experimental design, calculations, data analysis, or research-report writing.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence84%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Las implicaciones descritas ... están ligadas entre sí por la necesidad de transparentar el uso de los SIA y sus herramientas, lo que obliga moralmente al investigador a explicitar con claridad si se ha apoyado en ellas, ya sea en la formulación de preguntas, hipótesis y objetivos, en el diseño de experimentos, en la ejecución de los cálculos, el análisis de los datos o la elaboración del informe de investigación.

Localized display only

The document links AI-mediated research ethics to transparency: researchers should clearly state whether they used AI tools in research questions, design, calculations, analysis, or report writing.

Source Status

A 2025 UNAM DGTIC ethics diagnostic says UNAM did not yet have an institutional framework for ethical integration of AI systems, while recommending stronger normative work and ethics-committee capacity for AI cases.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence82%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Por el momento, la UNAM aún no cuenta con ningún marco institucional de integración de la ética en los SIA; no obstante existen áreas universitarias, como el IIMAS o el IIJ, que han profundizado en la aplicación de la ética al proceso investigativo y en la ética del derecho.

Localized display only

The diagnostic says UNAM does not yet have an institutional ethical-integration framework for AI systems, while noting university areas working on ethics and AI topics.

Source record

Official sources

4 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Reviewagent reviewedConfidence97%Snapshot statusNot publishedJSONPublic JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/universidad-nacional-autonoma-de-mexico

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Open change log