Policy presence
Imperial College London has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
London, United Kingdom
Imperial College London has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Imperial College London has 3 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Imperial College London has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Imperial College London has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Imperial College London has 5 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Imperial College London has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Imperial College London has 4 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Imperial College London has 4 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Imperial College London has 3 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Imperial College London has 3 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Imperial College London has 2 source-backed public claims for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Imperial College London
Imperial College London
12 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: {"tool":"self_deploy","rawToolName":"dAIsy","description":"Imperial College London secure AI platform for staff and students, with access to multiple generative AI models through one interface.","howToObtain":"Use Imperial College London’s dAIsy service page.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"self_hosted_system"}
Original evidence
Evidence 1dAIsy is Imperial College London’s secure AI platform, designed to give staff and students safe, easy access to multiple generative AI models (such as GPT, Claude, Deepseek, and others) through a single interface.
Localized display only
dAIsy is Imperial College London’s secure AI platform, designed to give staff and students safe, easy access to multiple generative AI models (such as GPT, Claude, Deepseek, and others) through a single interface.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot","description":"Built-in Microsoft 365 AI assistant for Word, Excel, Teams, and productivity workflows.","howToObtain":"Available to Imperial staff and students with Microsoft 365 access.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}
Original evidence
Evidence 1Microsoft Copilot is also available to all staff and students to use. It has a built-in AI assistant designed to boost productivity in apps like Word, Excel, and Teams, using your Microsoft 365 data securely.
Localized display only
Microsoft Copilot is also available to all staff and students to use. It has a built-in AI assistant designed to boost productivity in apps like Word, Excel, and Teams, using your Microsoft 365 data securely.
Academic Integrity
Original evidence
Evidence 1Unless explicitly authorised, using AI to create assessed work may be treated as an offence such as contract cheating under Imperial's Plagiarism, Academic Integrity & Exam Offences regulations. Familiarise yourself with Imperial's Academic Misconduct Policy for rules on appropriate AI usage.
Teaching
Original evidence
Evidence 1Individual departments may allow or prohibit GenAI for specific assessments; local (team/department/faculty) instructions take precedence. Always check the brief and acknowledge permitted AI use as directed.
Privacy
Original evidence
Evidence 1dAIsy uses University SSO and auditing. Logs (prompts/metadata) are retained for operational monitoring. Model providers are configured to not train on your data.
Academic Integrity
Original evidence
Evidence 1Breaches may lead to action under Academic Misconduct (students) and HR/disciplinary processes (staff), as well as Information Security and Data Protection policies. Sanctions may include removal of access, grade penalties, or formal disciplinary measures.
Teaching
Original evidence
Evidence 1You should include a statement to acknowledge your use of generative AI tools for all assessed work, in accordance with guidelines from your department or course team. This statement should be written in complete sentences and include the following information: Name and version of the generative AI tool e.g. Copilot, ChatGPT-5; Publisher (name of company that provides the AI system) e.g. Microsoft, OpenAI; URL of the AI tool; Brief description (single sentence) of the way in which the tool was used; Confirmation that the work is your own.
Research
Original evidence
Evidence 1Research that involves people, personal data, or sensitive topics may require ethics approval, a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA), and data-governance controls before using any AI tool.
Other
Original evidence
Evidence 1All Imperial staff and students have access to Microsoft Copilot. You should ensure you sign in to use Copilot so that you are using the secure version of Microsoft Copilot with Commercial Data Protection. MS Copilot has no access to organizational data in the Microsoft 365 Graph. Your data is protected and the chat results are NOT saved or made available for Microsoft, so the data does not pass outside of the organisation.
Other
Original evidence
Evidence 1Always apply critical judgement. GenAI can 'hallucinate', omit context, or reflect training-data biases. Users remain accountable for the accuracy, legality, and appropriateness of any content they submit or share.
Other
Original evidence
Evidence 1Do not upload third-party content you are not permitted to share. Ensure that any reuse of AI outputs complies with licensing and academic citation norms. When communicating externally, do not present dAIsy outputs as Imperial's position without approval.
Teaching
Original evidence
Evidence 1These principles are intended to provide a starting point for approaches to using generative AI in teaching, learning and assessment at Imperial. Imperial supports the use of the principles to frame and underpin activities university-wide as we as a community explore the use of generative AI, progress and develop policy, and establish guidelines. The principles are underpinned by Imperial's core Values. ... Promoting the critical use of generative AI in teaching, learning and assessment. Adopting a consistent ethical approach to the use of generative AI. Building a proactive research community around the use of generative AI.
0 machine or needs-review claim
16 source attribution
imperial.ac.uk
imperial.ac.uk
imperial.ac.uk
imperial.ac.uk
imperial.ac.uk
imperial.ac.uk
Imperial College London
imperial.ac.uk
imperial.ac.uk
imperial.ac.uk
imperial.ac.uk
imperial.ac.uk
imperial.ac.uk
imperial.ac.uk
imperial.ac.uk
imperial.ac.uk