Record history

Imperial College London

Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.

Tracker publication time is not a university policy effective date.

Matching revisions: 4

  1. Page update

    Page update

    Revision: v6-reading-rankings-ten-20261027
    View revision
    Other records · Page update

    Page update

    Comparable old and new text is unavailable.

    New text

    Shared V6 reading layout and evidence presentation updated. University policy Claims, original evidence, held decisions and snapshot approvals remain unchanged; the institution audit remains PARTIAL.

    Open revision history
  2. Site correction · Record addition

    Records involved: 17 (14 corrected / adjusted · 3 added)

    Revision: imperial-20261011-r2
    View revision

    What this record update means

    Structured record overview

    Records involved: 17 (14 corrected / adjusted · 3 added)

    Ai Tool Treatment · Academic integrity · 4 more topics

    No independently reviewed summary is available for this revision yet.

    This is a historical record summary, not confirmation of current permission or a new university rule.

    Academic integrity · Records involved: 4 (2 corrected / adjusted · 2 added)

    Record addition

    Added

    Imperial's Academic Misconduct procedures govern the investigation of suspected misconduct, potential sanctions, and applicable appeal rights. Students challenging an Academic Misconduct Panel decision must submit an appeal within ten College working days of notification; the general academic-results appeal procedure (with a 15 working-day window) does not apply to misconduct decisions. Potential misconduct in postgraduate research programmes is dealt with under Ordinance D17; the ten-day statement does not establish a deadline for that separate procedure.

    Record addition

    Added

    For the 2026–27 academic year, Imperial states that it does not use Turnitin's AI-writing detection functionality as part of its assessment processes. Academic-integrity concerns are evaluated by staff using academic judgement and evidence. This statement does not exclude authenticity interviews or other permitted investigative methods.

    Site correction

    Site conclusion text changes
    Old text

    Unless explicitly authorised, using generative AI to create assessed work may be treated as an academic offence such as contract cheating under Imperial's Plagiarism, Academic Integrity & Exam Offences regulations. Improper use of AI can be investigated under the University's Academic Misconduct procedures.

    New text

    Unless explicitly authorised, using artificial intelligence to create assessed work may be treated as an offence such as contract cheating under Imperial's Plagiarism, Academic Integrity & Exam Offences regulations.

    Site correction

    Comparable old and new text is unavailable.

    Old text

    Breaches of Imperial's dAIsy Use Policy may lead to action under Academic Misconduct procedures for students and HR/disciplinary processes for staff, as well as under Information Security and Data Protection policies. Sanctions may include removal of access, grade penalties, or formal disciplinary measures.

    New text

    Breaches of Imperial's dAIsy Use Policy may lead to action under Academic Misconduct procedures for students and HR/disciplinary processes for staff, as well as under Information Security and Data Protection policies. Sanctions may include removal of access, grade penalties, or formal disciplinary measures.

    Teaching · Records involved: 3 (3 corrected / adjusted)

    Site correction

    Site conclusion text changes
    Old text

    Students should include a statement acknowledging their use of generative AI tools for all assessed work, specifying the tool name and version, publisher, URL, a brief description of how it was used, and confirmation that the work is their own. Further requirements such as prompts used, date of output, the output obtained, and how it was modified may also be required by individual departments.

    New text

    Imperial Library guidance advises students to acknowledge generative AI use in assessed work and outlines recommended elements. When dAIsy is permitted for assessed work, its Use Policy requires students to acknowledge AI use and maintain transparency. Specific requirements and formats are determined by departments, courses, or assessment briefs.

    Site correction

    Site conclusion text changes
    Old text

    Individual departments at Imperial may allow or prohibit the use of generative AI for specific assessments. Local (team/department/faculty) instructions take precedence over university-wide guidance. Students should check their department's current policy on using and disclosing generative AI in academic work and follow their module leader's instructions.

    New text

    Individual Imperial departments may allow or prohibit generative AI for specific assessments; students must follow the assessment brief and local instructions. The dAIsy Use Policy complements existing university policies and does not replace them; university policy prevails where there is a conflict.

    Site correction

    Site conclusion text changes
    Old text

    Imperial College London has established five Generative AI Principles (aligned with Imperial Values: Respect, Collaboration, Excellence, Integrity, Innovation) to provide a foundational framework for approaches to using generative AI in teaching, learning and assessment university-wide. The principles cover promoting critical use of AI, adopting a consistent ethical approach, and building a proactive research community around AI in education.

    New text

    Imperial's generative AI guidance presents three areas of principles for teaching, learning and assessment: critical use of AI, a consistent ethical approach, and a proactive research community. They are underpinned by five core Values: Respect, Collaboration, Excellence, Integrity and Innovation. The principles are a non-exhaustive foundational framework; they do not establish blanket assessment permission.

    Privacy · Records involved: 3 (2 corrected / adjusted · 1 added)

    Site correction

    Site conclusion text changes
    Old text

    All Imperial staff and students have access to Microsoft Copilot with Commercial Data Protection when signed in using their Imperial credentials. Microsoft Copilot has no access to organizational data in the Microsoft 365 Graph. Chat results are not saved or made available to Microsoft, and data does not pass outside the organisation.

    New text

    Imperial provides Microsoft Copilot access to staff and students using institutional accounts. Microsoft Copilot Chat offers enterprise data protection, and prompts and responses are not used to train foundation models. Microsoft documents that Copilot Chat prompts and responses are logged and stored in Exchange within the Microsoft 365 tenant for auditing and eDiscovery. Access to organisational information and specific retention controls depend on the Microsoft product, licence, and tenant configuration. Users should follow Imperial's current data-protection requirements. When web grounding is enabled, generated search queries can be sent to Bing, which operates separately from Microsoft 365 under different data-handling terms. This record does not establish which features are enabled in Imperial's tenant.

    Site correction

    Comparable old and new text is unavailable.

    Old text

    Imperial's dAIsy AI platform uses University SSO authentication with auditing. Prompts and metadata are logged for operational monitoring, and AI model providers are configured not to train on user data. Users' prompts and responses are not used to train external AI models. dAIsy is approved for use with unrestricted data within Imperial's secure infrastructure.

    New text

    Imperial's dAIsy AI platform uses University SSO authentication with auditing. Prompts and metadata are logged for operational monitoring, and AI model providers are configured not to train on user data. Users' prompts and responses are not used to train external AI models. dAIsy is approved for use with unrestricted data within Imperial's secure infrastructure.

    Record addition

    Added

    Imperial states that Turnitin's proposed July 2026 changes concerning AI-related processing of student submissions have been deferred until at least the 2027–28 academic year. The university reports no corresponding change to its Turnitin usage arrangements during 2026–27.

    Research · Records involved: 1 (1 corrected / adjusted)

    Site correction

    Comparable old and new text is unavailable.

    Old text

    Research at Imperial that involves people, personal data, or sensitive topics may require ethics approval, a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA), and data-governance controls before using any AI tool. Researchers must verify whether their use of AI in research requires special approval, particularly when uploading private or confidential research data.

    New text

    Research at Imperial that involves people, personal data, or sensitive topics may require ethics approval, a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA), and data-governance controls before using any AI tool. Researchers must verify whether their use of AI in research requires special approval, particularly when uploading private or confidential research data.

    Ai Tool Treatment · Records involved: 4 (4 corrected / adjusted)

    Site correction

    Site conclusion text changes
    Old text

    GPT in dAIsy is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

    New text

    Imperial provides access to selected OpenAI GPT models through the institutional dAIsy platform. This does not establish access to the standalone ChatGPT service or permission to use GPT-generated content in assessed work.

    Site correction

    Site conclusion text changes
    Old text

    Claude in dAIsy is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

    New text

    Imperial provides access to selected Anthropic Claude models through the institutional dAIsy platform. This does not establish permission to use Claude-generated content in assessed work.

    Site correction

    Site conclusion text changes
    Old text

    DeepSeek in dAIsy is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

    New text

    Imperial provides access to selected DeepSeek models through the institutional dAIsy platform. This does not establish permission to use DeepSeek-generated content in assessed work.

    Site correction

    Site conclusion text changes
    Old text

    dAIsy is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

    New text

    Imperial provides dAIsy as its institutional multi-model generative-AI platform. Basic access is available to eligible staff and students to create Personal Agents; Developer access with shared agents is restricted to approved staff, and direct LLM API access is not currently provided. Platform access does not constitute coursework permission.

    Other records · Records involved: 2 (2 corrected / adjusted)

    Site correction

    Comparable old and new text is unavailable.

    Old text

    Users of Imperial's dAIsy platform must not upload third-party content they are not permitted to share. Reuse of AI outputs must comply with licensing and academic citation norms. When communicating externally, dAIsy outputs must not be presented as Imperial's position without approval.

    New text

    Users of Imperial's dAIsy platform must not upload third-party content they are not permitted to share. Reuse of AI outputs must comply with licensing and academic citation norms. When communicating externally, dAIsy outputs must not be presented as Imperial's position without approval.

    Site correction

    Comparable old and new text is unavailable.

    Old text

    Users of Imperial's dAIsy AI platform must always apply critical judgment to AI outputs. Generative AI can produce inaccurate or biased outputs ('hallucinate'), omit context, or reflect training-data biases. Users remain accountable for the accuracy, legality, and appropriateness of any content they submit or share through the platform.

    New text

    Users of Imperial's dAIsy AI platform must always apply critical judgment to AI outputs. Generative AI can produce inaccurate or biased outputs ('hallucinate'), omit context, or reflect training-data biases. Users remain accountable for the accuracy, legality, and appropriateness of any content they submit or share through the platform.

    Open revision history
  3. Record addition · Historical record · reason unclassified

    Records involved: 6 (4 added)

    Revision: public-release-20260715-005
    View revision

    What this record update means

    Structured record overview

    Records involved: 6 (4 added)

    Ai Tool Treatment

    No independently reviewed summary is available for this revision yet.

    This is a historical record summary, not confirmation of current permission or a new university rule.

    Ai Tool Treatment · Records involved: 6 (4 added)

    Record addition

    Added

    GPT in dAIsy is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

    Record addition

    Added

    Claude in dAIsy is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

    Record addition

    Added

    DeepSeek in dAIsy is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

    Record addition

    Added

    dAIsy is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

    Historical record · reason unclassified

    Comparable old and new text is unavailable.

    Old text

    Microsoft Copilot is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

    Historical record · reason unclassified

    Comparable old and new text is unavailable.

    Old text

    dAIsy is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

    Open revision history
  4. Record addition

    Records involved: 2 (2 added)

    Revision: public-release-20260614-001
    View revision

    What this record update means

    Structured record overview

    Records involved: 2 (2 added)

    Ai Tool Treatment

    No independently reviewed summary is available for this revision yet.

    This is a historical record summary, not confirmation of current permission or a new university rule.

    Ai Tool Treatment · Records involved: 2 (2 added)

    Record addition

    Added

    Microsoft Copilot is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

    Record addition

    Added

    dAIsy is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

    Open revision history

Historical reasons remain unclassified when the record does not specify them.

Historical evidence or classification is incomplete; see the revision history.

University pageHistory JSON