Policy presence
Hanyang University has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Seoul, South Korea
Hanyang University
Hanyang University is listed as QS 2026 rank 159. Hanyang University has 4 source-backed AI policy claim records from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
Hanyang University is listed as QS 2026 rank 159. Hanyang University has 4 source-backed AI policy claim records from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Hanyang University as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 15, 2026 and last changed on May 15, 2026. The record contains 4 source-backed claims, including 4 reviewed claims, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/hanyang-university.json. The entity-level confidence is 91%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Research claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, Claude, Gemini.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Hanyang University has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
Hanyang University has 1 source-backed public claim for coursework; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Exams
Hanyang University has 2 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Privacy and data entry
Hanyang University has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
Hanyang University has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Approved tools
Hanyang University has 3 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: required.
Named AI services
Hanyang University has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
Hanyang University has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
Hanyang University has 2 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
Hanyang University's AI@Hanyang guidance advises users not to enter personal information, confidential information, or other sensitive information into AI, and to use generative AI carefully because of security limits.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: do_not_enter_sensitive_information_into_ai
Original evidence
Evidence 1보안 및 개인정보 보호 개인정보나 기밀정보 등 민감한 정보를 AI에 입력하지 않아야 합니다. 생성형 AI의 보안 한계를 인지하고 신중하게 사용해야 합니다.
Localized display only
For security and privacy protection, the guide says not to enter personal, confidential, or other sensitive information into AI and to use generative AI carefully.
Academic Integrity
Hanyang University's AI@Hanyang guidance frames generative AI as a tool to support rather than replace learning, and says learners should follow instructor-provided AI guidelines and transparently disclose whether and how they used AI.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: students_follow_instructor_guidance_and_disclose_ai_use
Original evidence
Evidence 1생성형 AI는 학습을 대체하는 도구가 아닌 학습을 보조하는 도구로 활용해야 합니다. 학습자는 교수자가 제시한 AI 활용 가이드라인을 철저히 따라야 합니다. 학습자는 교수자에게 AI 활용 여부와 범위를 투명하게 공개해야 합니다.
Localized display only
Generative AI should support rather than replace learning. Learners should follow the instructor's AI-use guidelines and transparently disclose whether and how they used AI.
Research
Hanyang University's AI@Hanyang guidance says users need to check original sources and verify facts when using AI-provided information because generative AI can create false sources, biased information, or inaccurate citations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: verify_ai_outputs_against_original_sources
Original evidence
Evidence 1생성형 AI는 기존 검색엔진과 달리 실제 존재하는 정보를 검색하여 제시하는 것이 아니라, 학습된 데이터를 바탕으로 새로운 텍스트를 생성합니다. 이 과정에서 다음과 같은 문제가 발생할 수 있습니다. 허위정보 생성: AI가 실제로 존재하지 않는 출처나 인용문을 만들어낼 수 있습니다. 편향된 정보: 학습 데이터에 포함된 편향성이 답변에 반영될 수 있습니다. 따라서 AI가 제공한 정보는 반드시 원본 출처를 확인하고 사실관계를 검증할 필요가 있습니다.
Localized display only
The guide says generative AI creates text from training data and may produce nonexistent sources or quotes or biased information, so users need to check original sources and verify facts.
Ai Tool Treatment
Hanyang University's AI@Hanyang guide describes generative AI tool categories for academic and research support and lists text-generation examples including ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, and Microsoft Copilot.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_tool_categories_and_examples_listed
Original evidence
Evidence 1학업·연구 지원 생성형 AI 도구 생성형 AI는 생성되는 콘텐츠의 유형에 따라 텍스트, 이미지, 음성, 음악, 비디오 등으로 구분할 수 있습니다. 텍스트 생성 ChatGPT Google Gemini Claude Perplexity Microsoft Copilot
Localized display only
The guide lists generative AI tools for academic and research support by content type, including text-generation examples: ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, and Microsoft Copilot.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
2 source attribution
생성형 AI란? - AI@Hanyang
aiguide.hanyang.ac.kr
활용 시 유의사항 - AI@Hanyang
aiguide.hanyang.ac.kr
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.