Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage5 reviewedEvidence-backed claims5Reviewed5Candidate0Official sources4Source languagedePublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/goethe-university-frankfurt-am-main.json

Policy profile

Coverage score85/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence78%

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Privacy and data entry

Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence78%Evidence1Sources1

Approved tools

Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.

Conditionally AllowedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

Goethe University Frankfurt's student-facing Lehre virtuell guidance says students who intend to use AI in an examination context must discuss what is allowed with their instructors and should assume no explicit permission is equivalent to a prohibition.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: exam_context_requires_instructor_clarification

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Gerade wenn Sie vorhaben, KI im Prüfungskontext (z.B. beim Schreiben von Hausarbeiten) einzusetzen, müssen Sie unbedingt mit Ihren Dozierenden besprechen, was im Rahmen der Lehrveranstaltung und Prüfungsordnung erlaubt und verboten ist.

Localized display only

Students intending to use AI in an examination context must discuss what is allowed or forbidden with instructors.

Academic Integrity

Goethe University Frankfurt's teacher-facing assessment guidance recommends defining clear rules for AI use, making AI use transparent, and using AI detection software only as supporting evidence rather than as the sole basis for proof.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: clear_rules_transparency_detection_not_sole_proof

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Transparenz ist entscheidend: Studierende müssen klar erkennen, was erlaubt und was nicht erlaubt ist. Praxisempfehlungen - Erstellung einer Liste erlaubter KI-Hilfsmittel

Localized display only

The guidance says transparency is decisive and recommends creating a list of permitted AI aids.

Privacy

Goethe University Frankfurt's general Lehre virtuell guidance tells users not to enter personal or sensitive information when using AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: do_not_enter_personal_or_sensitive_information

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Geben Sie keine persönlichen oder sensiblen Informationen ein, wenn Sie KI-Tools nutzen.

Localized display only

Do not enter personal or sensitive information when using AI tools.

Teaching

Goethe University Frankfurt has an official Generative AI working group that serves as a central contact point and provides handouts, tool access information, and a Community of Practice for generative AI in study and teaching.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: central_gai_working_group_and_guidance

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Ziel der AG ist es, zu dem sehr vielseitigen und umfassenden Thema, einen zentralen Anlaufpunkt zu bieten, um gemeinsam mit möglichst allen Beteiligten der Universität Antworten auf diese teilweise noch ungeklärten Fragen zu finden und in Form von konkreten Angeboten weiterzutragen.

Localized display only

The working group aims to provide a central contact point and concrete offerings on generative AI for university stakeholders.

Ai Tool Treatment

Goethe University Frankfurt's general Lehre virtuell guidance states that the university generally supports testing and applying generative AI in study and teaching, while noting ethical, legal, and didactic considerations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: generally_supports_testing_and_application_with_conditions

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Aus diesem Grund befürwortet die Goethe-Universität grundsätzlich die Erprobung und Anwendung von GKI in Studium und Lehre. Bei der Nutzung von GKI sind jedoch sowohl ethische, rechtliche und natürlich auch didaktische Aspekte zu berücksichtigen

Localized display only

Goethe University generally supports testing and applying GAI in study and teaching, while noting ethical, legal, and didactic aspects.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

4 source attribution

AG: Generative KI - Die zentrale Anlaufstelle zum Thema Generative KI

gki.studiumdigitale.uni-frankfurt.de

Snapshot hash
a5d99022a91ed1a762742f3038da7288fca064e509c4b0228823b4763436bb31

Change log

Last checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities