Policy presence
Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main
Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main is listed as QS 2026 rank 316. Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main is listed as QS 2026 rank 316. Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 4 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/goethe-university-frankfurt-am-main.json. The entity-level confidence is 93%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Coursework
Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Exams
Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Named AI services
Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main has 3 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Goethe University Frankfurt's student-facing Lehre virtuell guidance says students who intend to use AI in an examination context must discuss what is allowed with their instructors and should assume no explicit permission is equivalent to a prohibition.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: exam_context_requires_instructor_clarification
Original evidence
Evidence 1Gerade wenn Sie vorhaben, KI im Prüfungskontext (z.B. beim Schreiben von Hausarbeiten) einzusetzen, müssen Sie unbedingt mit Ihren Dozierenden besprechen, was im Rahmen der Lehrveranstaltung und Prüfungsordnung erlaubt und verboten ist.
Localized display only
Students intending to use AI in an examination context must discuss what is allowed or forbidden with instructors.
Academic Integrity
Goethe University Frankfurt's teacher-facing assessment guidance recommends defining clear rules for AI use, making AI use transparent, and using AI detection software only as supporting evidence rather than as the sole basis for proof.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: clear_rules_transparency_detection_not_sole_proof
Original evidence
Evidence 1Transparenz ist entscheidend: Studierende müssen klar erkennen, was erlaubt und was nicht erlaubt ist. Praxisempfehlungen - Erstellung einer Liste erlaubter KI-Hilfsmittel
Localized display only
The guidance says transparency is decisive and recommends creating a list of permitted AI aids.
Privacy
Goethe University Frankfurt's general Lehre virtuell guidance tells users not to enter personal or sensitive information when using AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: do_not_enter_personal_or_sensitive_information
Original evidence
Evidence 1Geben Sie keine persönlichen oder sensiblen Informationen ein, wenn Sie KI-Tools nutzen.
Localized display only
Do not enter personal or sensitive information when using AI tools.
Teaching
Goethe University Frankfurt has an official Generative AI working group that serves as a central contact point and provides handouts, tool access information, and a Community of Practice for generative AI in study and teaching.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: central_gai_working_group_and_guidance
Original evidence
Evidence 1Ziel der AG ist es, zu dem sehr vielseitigen und umfassenden Thema, einen zentralen Anlaufpunkt zu bieten, um gemeinsam mit möglichst allen Beteiligten der Universität Antworten auf diese teilweise noch ungeklärten Fragen zu finden und in Form von konkreten Angeboten weiterzutragen.
Localized display only
The working group aims to provide a central contact point and concrete offerings on generative AI for university stakeholders.
Ai Tool Treatment
Goethe University Frankfurt's general Lehre virtuell guidance states that the university generally supports testing and applying generative AI in study and teaching, while noting ethical, legal, and didactic considerations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: generally_supports_testing_and_application_with_conditions
Original evidence
Evidence 1Aus diesem Grund befürwortet die Goethe-Universität grundsätzlich die Erprobung und Anwendung von GKI in Studium und Lehre. Bei der Nutzung von GKI sind jedoch sowohl ethische, rechtliche und natürlich auch didaktische Aspekte zu berücksichtigen
Localized display only
Goethe University generally supports testing and applying GAI in study and teaching, while noting ethical, legal, and didactic aspects.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
4 source attribution
AG: Generative KI - Die zentrale Anlaufstelle zum Thema Generative KI
gki.studiumdigitale.uni-frankfurt.de
Allgemeine Empfehlungen im Umgang mit generativer KI in Studium und Lehre
lehre-virtuell.uni-frankfurt.de
Einsatz von generativer KI im Studium - Handlungsempfehlungen fuer Studierende
lehre-virtuell.uni-frankfurt.de
Handreichung fuer Lehrende - Umgang mit generativer KI in Pruefungsleistungen
lehre-virtuell.uni-frankfurt.de
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.