Lyon, France

École Normale Supérieure de Lyon

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage3 reviewedEvidence-backed claims3Reviewed3Candidate0Official sources3Source languagefrPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/ecole-normale-superieure-de-lyon.json

Policy profile

Coverage score85/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence66%

AI disclosure

École Normale Supérieure de Lyon has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence68%Evidence1Sources1

Privacy and data entry

No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Academic integrity

École Normale Supérieure de Lyon has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.

RequiredMachine candidateConfidence68%Evidence1Sources1

Approved tools

École Normale Supérieure de Lyon has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence61%Evidence1Sources1

Named AI services

No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Teaching

ENS Lyon's IFÉ Édurevue n°154 frames AI, especially generative AI, as an education topic involving regulatory reference points, ethical questions, and teacher training; this is an education-watch synthesis, not a binding institution-wide student AI-use policy.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence82%

Normalized value: education-watch synthesis on AI and generative AI in education

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Dans l'Édurevue 154, nous interrogeons en quoi l’IA, et en particulier l’IAG, constitue un vecteur de changements et de nouveaux enjeux en éducation. Tout d’abord, il s’agit d’en définir les repères conceptuels, techniques et règlementaires, notamment dans le domaine éducatif.

Localized display only

Édurevue 154 asks how AI, especially generative AI, creates changes and new issues in education, including conceptual, technical, and regulatory reference points.

Academic Integrity

The IFÉ Édurevue n°154 discusses generative AI in relation to plagiarism, cheating, assessment design, and academic integrity; it cites examples of other universities' AI charters but does not establish an ENS Lyon AI-use charter.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence80%

Normalized value: analysis of plagiarism, assessment, and academic integrity issues raised by generative AI

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Les IAG interrogent également la place et les modalités évaluatives ; elles soulèvent à cet égard des enjeux éthiques liés à l’intégrité et l’honnêteté. Ces systèmes font beaucoup parler d’eux sur la question du plagiat et de la triche.

Localized display only

The Édurevue states that generative AI raises ethical issues for assessment, integrity, honesty, plagiarism, and cheating.

Teaching

The ENS-hosted CultureSciences Physique site has a teaching-resource item on generative AI, teaching, and evaluation that points to external resources; the page is a resource pointer and should not be treated as ENS Lyon institutional policy.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence72%

Normalized value: ENS-hosted teaching resource pointer on generative AI and assessment

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Il met en ligne de nombreux outils sur l'IA pour l'enseignement et l'évaluation dans le contexte scolaire : Positionnement et réflexion sur les activités d'évaluation ; Corpus pédagogique sur l’IA générative et l’enseignement.

Localized display only

The page points to tools for AI in teaching and evaluation in school contexts, including evaluation-activity reflection and a pedagogical corpus on generative AI and teaching.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

3 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 15, 2026Last changedMay 15, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities