Seoul, South Korea

Dongguk University

Dongguk University has 4 source-backed AI policy claims from 3 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 4 reviewed claims. Last checked May 17, 2026.

Dongguk University AI policy short answer

v1 public contract

Dongguk University has 4 source-backed AI policy claims from 3 official source attributions, including 4 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 17, 2026. Discovery context: Dongguk University is listed as QS 2026 rank =618.

Citation-ready summary

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Dongguk University as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 17, 2026 and last changed on May 17, 2026. The record contains 4 source-backed claims, including 4 reviewed claims, from 3 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/dongguk-university.json. The entity-level confidence is 90%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim coverage4 reviewedSource languagekoPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/dongguk-university.json

Policy signals in this record

  • Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
  • Evidence includes Teaching claims.
  • Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
  • Evidence includes Security review claims.
  • Named AI services detected in public claims: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini.
  • Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
  • Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedEvidence-backed claims4Reviewed4Candidate0Official sources3

This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.

This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy profile

Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.

Coverage score85/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence73%

Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.

Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.

Privacy and data entry

No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.

Evidence-backed claims

4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

The same Dongguk notice says its ChatGPT guideline covers instructor guidance to state use principles in syllabi, inform students, and consider assessment design, and learner guidance to follow instructor-provided ChatGPT principles, analyze and verify ChatGPT answers, check similarity to existing works, cite sources, and avoid overreliance.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: college-notice-chatgpt-instructor-student-guidance

Original evidence

Evidence 1
나. 가이드라인 주요 내용 2) 교수자를 위한 가이드라인 가) 강의계획서에 활용 원칙 명시 나) 수강생 대상 활용 안내 다) 평가방법 설계 시 고려 사항 3) 학습자를 위한 가이드라인 가) 교수자가 제시한 ChatGPT 활용 원칙 준수 나) ChatGPT의 답변 분석 및 검증 다) 기존 저작물과의 유사성 검토 및 출처 명시 라) 과몰입, 과의존 경계

Localized display only

The guideline contents include instructor guidance to state use principles in syllabi, inform students, and consider assessment design, plus learner guidance to follow instructor principles, analyze and verify ChatGPT answers, check similarity to existing works, cite sources, and avoid overreliance.

Teaching

A Dongguk Advanced Convergence College notice describes ChatGPT guideline objectives that include improving members' understanding of generative AI, improving learning experience through class use of ChatGPT, presenting measures for safe and ethical use, and reducing confusion in academic operations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: college-notice-chatgpt-guideline-purpose

Original evidence

Evidence 1
가. 가이드라인 수립 목적 1) 생성형 인공지능(AI)에 대한 대학 구성원들의 이해도 증진 2) ChatGPT의 수업에의 활용을 통해 교육 수요자의 학습 경험 향상 및 학업 성취도 증대 3) ChatGPT의 안전하고 윤리적인 활용을 위한 대응책 제시 4) 학사 운영 전반의 일관성 확보 및 혼란 발생 최소화

Localized display only

Guideline objectives include improving university members' understanding of generative AI, using ChatGPT in classes to improve learning experience and achievement, presenting measures for safe and ethical use, and minimizing confusion in academic operations.

Ai Tool Treatment

Dongguk's central notice announced a paid generative AI service and linked a service guide describing an all-in-one generative AI platform with selectable model families such as GPT, Gemini, and Claude, plus custom chatbot features.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence82%

Normalized value: central-notice-paid-generative-ai-service-guide

Original evidence

Evidence 1
생성형 AI 유료 서비스 오픈(4.27(월) 13시) 및 이용 안내 등록일 2026.04.23. 첨부파일 Dongguk generative AI service user guide attachment

Localized display only

Dongguk posted a general notice for opening a paid generative AI service on April 27 at 13:00 and attached Dongguk generative AI service user guide.

Original evidence

Evidence 2
생성형AI서비스는 최신 LLM부터 이미지·동영상 특화 모델, 그리고 국가통계 데이터 분석까지 탑재된 생성형 AI 올인원 플랫폼입니다. 대시보드 상단 메뉴에서 GPT-5, Claude, Gemini 등 글로벌 최신 모델부터 우리 기관만의 커스텀 챗봇까지, 모든 AI 모델을 한눈에 비교하고 즉시 전환해 보세요.

Localized display only

The service guide describes a generative AI all-in-one platform with current LLMs, image/video-specialized models, data-analysis capabilities, and a dashboard for selecting model families such as GPT, Claude, and Gemini.

Security Review

The official Dongguk generative AI service guide says custom chatbots can be made public through store registration, but store registration requires an administrator approval process; private chatbots are usable only by their creator.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence80%

Normalized value: custom-chatbot-publication-admin-approval

Original evidence

Evidence 1
챗봇을 공개로 설정하면 스토어 등록을 통해 선택한 멤버 그룹과 카테고리 내 사용자들이 챗봇을 사용할 수 있게 됩니다. 단, 스토어 등록을 위해서는 관리자의 승인 절차가 필요합니다. 비공개 챗봇은 생성자 본인만 사용할 수 있으며, 언제든 자유롭게 수정하거나 설정을 변경할 수 있어요.

Localized display only

For custom chatbots, making a chatbot public allows selected member groups and category users to use it through store registration, but store registration requires administrator approval; private chatbots are usable only by their creator.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

3 source attribution

Change log

Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.

View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.

Last checkedMay 17, 2026Last changedMay 17, 2026Open change log

Corrections and missing evidence

Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.

If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.

Back to universities