Kiel, Germany

Christian-Albrechts-University zu Kiel

Christian-Albrechts-University zu Kiel has 1 source-backed AI policy claim from 2 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 1 reviewed claim. Last checked May 17, 2026.

Christian-Albrechts-University zu Kiel AI policy short answer

v1 public contract

Christian-Albrechts-University zu Kiel has 1 source-backed AI policy claim from 2 official source attributions, including 1 reviewed claim. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 17, 2026. Discovery context: Christian-Albrechts-University zu Kiel is listed as QS 2026 rank =618.

Citation-ready summary

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Christian-Albrechts-University zu Kiel as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 17, 2026 and last changed on May 17, 2026. The record contains 1 source-backed claim, including 1 reviewed claim, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/christian-albrechts-university-zu-kiel.json. The entity-level confidence is 94%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim coverage1 reviewedSource languagede, enPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/christian-albrechts-university-zu-kiel.json

Policy signals in this record

  • Evidence includes Source status claims.
  • No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedEvidence-backed claims1Reviewed1Candidate0Official sources2

This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.

This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy profile

Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.

Coverage score15/100Coverage labelminimal public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence80%

Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.

Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.

Policy presence

Christian-Albrechts-University zu Kiel has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.

UnclearMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence1Sources1

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coursework

No source-backed public claim about coursework AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about coursework, assignments, or syllabus-level AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Exams

No source-backed public claim about exam AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about exams, tests, quizzes, or examination conditions.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Privacy and data entry

No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Academic integrity

No source-backed public claim about academic-integrity treatment of AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about AI use under academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Approved tools

No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Named AI services

No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Teaching guidance

No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.

Evidence-backed claims

1 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Source Status

CAU Kiel's official robots files disallow generic crawler access on the central www.uni-kiel.de and Digitale Lehre hosts, so this staged run records the AI guidance candidates as robots-disallowed and does not derive policy claims from those pages.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: robots_disallowed_for_user_agent_star

Original evidence

Evidence 1
# Mit dieser Datei koennen Suchmaschinen gebeten werden, gewisse Seiten nicht in den Index aufzunehmen. User-agent: * Disallow: /

Localized display only

The central CAU robots.txt says that User-agent * is disallowed from /.

Original evidence

Evidence 2
# By default we allow robots to access all areas of our site already accessible to anonymous users ... User-agent: * Disallow: /

Localized display only

The Digitale Lehre robots.txt says that User-agent * is disallowed from /.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

2 source attribution

Change log

Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.

View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.

Last checkedMay 17, 2026Last changedMay 17, 2026Open change log

Corrections and missing evidence

Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.

If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.

Back to universities